Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
DMan7 wrote:And let's address the elephant in the room, the question everyone in here most likely gonna ask.
When is T&T gonna give their citizens a UBI?
Redman wrote:We need value creation not more dependency on the state.
It will stagnate the economy becoming like Tobago.
If all new biz has to compete with the state for labor of any quality it will stifle innovation.
Cepep is already doing this to some extent.
Dohplaydat wrote:Redman wrote:We need value creation not more dependency on the state.
It will stagnate the economy becoming like Tobago.
If all new biz has to compete with the state for labor of any quality it will stifle innovation.
Cepep is already doing this to some extent.
Ubi doesn't mean people will automatically lose incentives, infact it could be a big catalyst in encouraging entrepreneurshi, higher education and reduction in crime.
Basically Trinidad should have done this since Manning's oil boom. We'd be in a much better position today.
And yes there are negatives but once a country can afford it and I believe we could have, it greatly benefits the economy.
Them feel we are like the US and could just print money and value is created. We are a Caribbean country facing a recession, I don't care what moody ,IMF or Terrence mammy say, deficit budget after deficit budget means generations to come gonna immensely sufferRedman wrote:Dohplaydat wrote:Redman wrote:We need value creation not more dependency on the state.
It will stagnate the economy becoming like Tobago.
If all new biz has to compete with the state for labor of any quality it will stifle innovation.
Cepep is already doing this to some extent.
Ubi doesn't mean people will automatically lose incentives, infact it could be a big catalyst in encouraging entrepreneurshi, higher education and reduction in crime.
Basically Trinidad should have done this since Manning's oil boom. We'd be in a much better position today.
And yes there are negatives but once a country can afford it and I believe we could have, it greatly benefits the economy.
3000x1.3m is about 4b.
Plus admin.
Tell us how we affording another 4 b a year in social programs.
hover11 wrote:Them feel we are like the US and could just print money and value is created. We are a Caribbean country facing a recession, I don't care what moody ,IMF or Terrence mammy say, deficit budget after deficit budget means generations to come gonna immensely sufferRedman wrote:Dohplaydat wrote:Redman wrote:We need value creation not more dependency on the state.
It will stagnate the economy becoming like Tobago.
If all new biz has to compete with the state for labor of any quality it will stifle innovation.
Cepep is already doing this to some extent.
Ubi doesn't mean people will automatically lose incentives, infact it could be a big catalyst in encouraging entrepreneurshi, higher education and reduction in crime.
Basically Trinidad should have done this since Manning's oil boom. We'd be in a much better position today.
And yes there are negatives but once a country can afford it and I believe we could have, it greatly benefits the economy.
3000x1.3m is about 4b.
Plus admin.
Tell us how we affording another 4 b a year in social programs.
There is a reason why there is something called the haves and haves not,it creates equilibrium. Money in too many people hands suffers the economy.Our economy needs to focus on cutting initiatives and not adding more dependency syndrome. CEPEP, URP needs to be cut or severely minimized or we spinning top in mudDohplaydat wrote:hover11 wrote:Them feel we are like the US and could just print money and value is created. We are a Caribbean country facing a recession, I don't care what moody ,IMF or Terrence mammy say, deficit budget after deficit budget means generations to come gonna immensely sufferRedman wrote:Dohplaydat wrote:Redman wrote:We need value creation not more dependency on the state.
It will stagnate the economy becoming like Tobago.
If all new biz has to compete with the state for labor of any quality it will stifle innovation.
Cepep is already doing this to some extent.
Ubi doesn't mean people will automatically lose incentives, infact it could be a big catalyst in encouraging entrepreneurshi, higher education and reduction in crime.
Basically Trinidad should have done this since Manning's oil boom. We'd be in a much better position today.
And yes there are negatives but once a country can afford it and I believe we could have, it greatly benefits the economy.
3000x1.3m is about 4b.
Plus admin.
Tell us how we affording another 4 b a year in social programs.
It's not money wasted though and it removes funding from many other social programs.
Lots of it will be recouped in taxes via economic activity and VAT. The net benefit to society and the economy will outweigh the negatives. Lots of economic models show this.
The more money people have in hand the better the economy.
Now I'm not saying we can afford it now (thought we still might be able too).
I was initially thinking something like $1800 a month to all over 18s minus retirees who get pension and NIS. So that will cost $15B a year. That's something not out of the realm of affordability for Trinidad.
That may not seem like a lot, but in households with 2 or more adults, that adds up a lot!
Man believed in his "vision 2020"dogg wrote:If our past governments were serious about our country,
the H&S fund would have been at least 5x what it is now.
This is one of the reasons I tell people that Manning was the worst PM this country ever had.
The amount of money he squandered on foolishness makes me cringe anytime I think of it.
$B summits, empty skyscrapers, construction sprees that overheated the industry - that is still felt up to this day.
Its too much to quantify really.
Don't forget too, he once famously said that he didn't believe in saving surpluses... spend spend spend!
On that same token, Kamla was the 2nd worse.
Redman,Redman wrote:Not necessarily.
If the deficits are being run in order to develop value creating assets then run them.
If we build an enterprise that is generating more than the cost of funds ....and is sustainable..then by all means borrow
The currency we paying back is worth less every year...we should be exchanging Fiat for things that hold value.
If we run surpluses we should be allocating to a wealth fund...that will....create portfolios of value creating/income generating assets with low correlation/causal relationship to our economy...
If that SWF generating surplus....at that point we get into social support.
Trinidad did but our UBI went into the hands of 1%, red government family and friends.Dohplaydat wrote:Redman wrote:We need value creation not more dependency on the state.
It will stagnate the economy becoming like Tobago.
If all new biz has to compete with the state for labor of any quality it will stifle innovation.
Cepep is already doing this to some extent.
Ubi doesn't mean people will automatically lose incentives, infact it could be a big catalyst in encouraging entrepreneurshi, higher education and reduction in crime.
Basically Trinidad should have done this since Manning's oil boom. We'd be in a much better position today.
And yes there are negatives but once a country can afford it and I believe we could have, it greatly benefits the economy.