Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
slimshiney wrote:Doh fret......The full shot coming......when TTSPCA start turning them down.........WATCH OUT IN THE STREETS....ALREADY,THERE IS ONE ROAMING BETWEEN FOOD GIANT AND TOYOTA!!
nemisis wrote:i haven't seen anywhere in the bill that said you have to kill your dog, it just said you need to have it registered, spayed or neutered and insured. What exactly is the problem?
RIPEBREDFRUIT wrote:a Collar and a CHAIN does NOT count as a SEcure Place to keep a dog, too many people are too damn Cheap or LAZY to Spend the money and time to secure their pets.
I Certainly HOPE that all of these dog owners who are protesting that they are allowed to keep their dogs will bring them out at their protest, imagine if one of these TAME lovable creatures was to get away from their owner and BITE or kill some other INNOCENT pet owner- Oh the irony.
slimshiney wrote::( .........even in here people don't get the point......THAT THIS ACT WILL ONLY CAUSE MORE MAULINGS.......
YOU HAVE DOGS THAT WILL BE UNFED AND STARVING & THAT WILL BE WALKING THE STREETS............every gunta and harry have pitbull..............
RIPEBREDFRUIT wrote:a Collar and a CHAIN does NOT count as a SEcure Place to keep a dog, too many people are too damn Cheap or LAZY to Spend the money and time to secure their pets.
RIPEBREDFRUIT wrote:it ALL boils down to RESPONSIBILITY of the OWNERS.
If someone is not Financially Capable of owning a dog then they should not be allowed BY LAW to have one or face Charges.
All the bickering about -omg how much it costing to Own one of these dogs now, if YOU truly LOve and care about your animal then SHUT yuh damn mouth, pay what youre supposed to, provide a SECURE and safe home for it and you should be alright.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 90 guests