Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
eliteauto wrote:and here I thought the only UWI chicks making money were those from Nat Sci that moonlight as whores in Stumblin
eliteauto wrote:and here I thought the only UWI chicks making money were those from Nat Sci that moonlight as whores in Stumblin
eliteauto wrote:and here I thought the only UWI chicks making money were those from Nat Sci that moonlight as whores in Stumblin
kaylex wrote:
John said proposals ranging from $5 million to $14 million were received and according to HDC rules—the contract must be awarded to the lowest tenderer—which was Riverside Enterprises Ltd.
Mark! wrote:eliteauto wrote:and here I thought the only UWI chicks making money were those from Nat Sci that moonlight as whores in Stumblin
whoa, whoa, whoaaaaaaaa
sharkman121 wrote:kaylex wrote:
John said proposals ranging from $5 million to $14 million were received and according to HDC rules—the contract must be awarded to the lowest tenderer—which was Riverside Enterprises Ltd.
Is this the policy by which they abide?
sharkman121 wrote:kaylex wrote:
John said proposals ranging from $5 million to $14 million were received and according to HDC rules—the contract must be awarded to the lowest tenderer—which was Riverside Enterprises Ltd.
Is this the policy by which they abide? no wonder this country so blasted corrupted. This is not how all ministries operate btw.
The HDC does not bind itself to accept the lowest or any proposal submitted.
Rory Phoulorie wrote:sharkman121 wrote:kaylex wrote:
John said proposals ranging from $5 million to $14 million were received and according to HDC rules—the contract must be awarded to the lowest tenderer—which was Riverside Enterprises Ltd.
Is this the policy by which they abide? no wonder this country so blasted corrupted. This is not how all ministries operate btw.
Quoted from an HDC tender document that I am currently submitting a response to:The HDC does not bind itself to accept the lowest or any proposal submitted.
Rory Phoulorie wrote:sharkman121 wrote:kaylex wrote:
John said proposals ranging from $5 million to $14 million were received and according to HDC rules—the contract must be awarded to the lowest tenderer—which was Riverside Enterprises Ltd.
Is this the policy by which they abide? no wonder this country so blasted corrupted. This is not how all ministries operate btw.
Quoted from an HDC tender document that I am currently submitting a response to:The HDC does not bind itself to accept the lowest or any proposal submitted.
sharkman121 wrote:kaylex wrote:
John said proposals ranging from $5 million to $14 million were received and according to HDC rules—the contract must be awarded to the lowest tenderer—which was Riverside Enterprises Ltd.
Is this the policy by which they abide? no wonder this country so blasted corrupted. This is not how all ministries operate btw.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 21 guests