Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
First evidence that the universe is not as we know it has emerged from the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), the giant atom-smashing machine built to recreate conditions at the dawn of time.
Confirmation of the results, showing minute deviations in the behaviour of a sub-atomic particle, would indicate the existence of a 'new physics' model of the universe.
Evidence For 'New Physics' Means Universe Is Not As We Know It
PA | Posted: 31/07/2013 21:12 BST | Updated: 02/08/2013 10:03 BST PA
Share on Google+
2,032
205
45
188
Get UK Tech Newsletters:
Subscribe
Follow:
CMS Detector, European Physics Society, Atom-Smashing Machine, B Quark And a d Antiquark, Large Hadron Collider, New Physics, Standard Model, Universe, UK Tech News
First evidence that the universe is not as we know it has emerged from the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), the giant atom-smashing machine built to recreate conditions at the dawn of time.
Confirmation of the results, showing minute deviations in the behaviour of a sub-atomic particle, would indicate the existence of a 'new physics' model of the universe.
milky way
Our view and place in the universe may have to be revised
Until now scientists have relied on the 'Standard Model', a description of the nuts and bolts mechanics of the universe - its particles and forces - that has worked well but contains serious gaps.
For instance, the Standard Model cannot explain phenomena such as dark matter, invisible material that shrouds galaxies and holds them together, or gravity.
The term 'new physics' was coined to describe more fundamental theories that go beyond the Standard Model, some of which involve strange concepts such as tiny vibrating "strings" and extra dimensions.
A Spanish and French team has now announced results that could be the first indication of a New Physics reality.
They involve data from the LHCb, one of the giant detectors that form part of the LHC on the French-Swiss border.
Scientists were measuring the decay of a fundamental particle called the B meson. They revealed deviations from what was predicted by the Standard Model that show a coherent pattern, and are consistent with New Physics.
The findings amount to a significant 'proof' level of 4.5 sigmas - just under the level of five sigmas which is regarded as a bona fide discovery.
If confirmed by other teams, it amounts to a 'major event' pointing to a realm beyond the Standard Model, say the physicists.
sMASH wrote:Nearly every time there is a new discovery, things point away from the standard model. Get used to science , this is how it werks
rocknrolla wrote:sMASH wrote:Nearly every time there is a new discovery, things point away from the standard model. Get used to science , this is how it werks
all well and good. but dont forget what the standard model is. a ruleset devised on TOTALLY LOGICAL principles. deviations from the standard model is science being forced toward spirituality and away from hardcore logical fundamentalism.
maybe if ur lucky ull be alive when science claims it is now able to peer into another dimension. i do it all the time ,)
SMc wrote:before you go ...any links to those other sites?
I am interested as I am a member of Skeptics in the Pub and would like to ask them about your thoughts on... actually doh bother
ABA Trading LTD wrote:SMc wrote:before you go ...any links to those other sites?
I am interested as I am a member of Skeptics in the Pub and would like to ask them about your thoughts on... actually doh bother
here's the ONE other forum he posted it on
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread962991/pg1
First evidence that the universe is not as we know it has emerged from the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), the giant atom-smashing machine built to recreate conditions at the dawn of time.
highly inaccurate description of the purpose and results of the LHC......in fact its just plain wrong. lol
Confirmation of the results, showing minute deviations in the behaviour of a sub-atomic particle, would indicate the existence of a 'new physics' model of the universe.
'new physics' would get the average person to think that whatever they knew before is wrong. 'new physics' in the case is just an addition to what is already known.
rocknrolla wrote:ABA Trading LTD wrote:SMc wrote:before you go ...any links to those other sites?
I am interested as I am a member of Skeptics in the Pub and would like to ask them about your thoughts on... actually doh bother
here's the ONE other forum he posted it on
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread962991/pg1
ahh look. one is able to follow breadcrumbs left for them to follow before the birds eat up the crumbs on the path.
good luck to all. i have suffered myself to enough torment and ridicule by the hands of my own fellow citizens on this website. i have said all that needs to be said. who still cannot hear will probably not ever hear.
my duty is done. if u want to find the light, do ur own homework
namaste
"every one who is seriously involved in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that a spirit is manifest in the laws of the Universe—a spirit vastly superior to that of man and one in the face of which we with our modest powers must feel humble."
— Albert Einstein. Letter (24 Jan 1936). Quoted in Helen Dukas and Banesh Hoffman Albert Einstein: The Human Side (1981) 33. Science quotes
Einstein considered himself to be agnostic, not believing or disbeliving in God.EXODUS wrote:"every one who is seriously involved in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that a spirit is manifest in the laws of the Universe—a spirit vastly superior to that of man and one in the face of which we with our modest powers must feel humble."
— Albert Einstein. Letter (24 Jan 1936). Quoted in Helen Dukas and Banesh Hoffman Albert Einstein: The Human Side (1981) 33. Science quotes
so 2000+ years scientists still doubting GOD himself with the human race monkey evolution and universe formation hullabuloo.
whats so great & baffling is that 90% or more of the things Einstein said/did made sense, is true, practical and logical...and all that was b4 the modern tech and scientists of the 20th century...hmmm
j.o.e wrote:So Penny still on the show right?
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:Einstein considered himself to be agnostic, not believing or disbeliving in God.EXODUS wrote:"every one who is seriously involved in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that a spirit is manifest in the laws of the Universe—a spirit vastly superior to that of man and one in the face of which we with our modest powers must feel humble."
— Albert Einstein. Letter (24 Jan 1936). Quoted in Helen Dukas and Banesh Hoffman Albert Einstein: The Human Side (1981) 33. Science quotes
so 2000+ years scientists still doubting GOD himself with the human race monkey evolution and universe formation hullabuloo.
whats so great & baffling is that 90% or more of the things Einstein said/did made sense, is true, practical and logical...and all that was b4 the modern tech and scientists of the 20th century...hmmm
"Einstein expressed his skepticism regarding an anthropomorphic deity, often describing it as "naïve" and "childlike". He stated, "It seems to me that the idea of a personal God is an anthropological concept which I cannot take seriously."
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Duane 3NE 2NR, Google [Bot] and 55 guests