Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
hustla_ambition101 wrote:I don't know who worse, natio or effectic
Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:hustla_ambition101 wrote:I don't know who worse, natio or effectic
How dare you insult natio like that.
janfar wrote:Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:hustla_ambition101 wrote:I don't know who worse, natio or effectic
How dare you insult natio like that.
Ahahahhahahahahhaha... Effectic should take his account, stretch it thin and long like rope and end himself with it...
UML wrote:The Calcutta ship landed at Macoya on Saturday
#noshame
sliderz1 wrote:that neither/abstain group number is concerning
Habit7 wrote:T&T is not running out of gas soon. The prospects just lie further into deeper water meaning less return on investment. But with the US flooding the market with natural gas the prices will be low and not justify deepwater production.
Plus concurrent maintenance downtime at our refinery not helping us either.
Nevertheless, the Gov't has fail to be an early stage adjuster to mitigate against this and we are in no better situation than prior to aluminium smelter plans which would have consumed our excess natural gas.
De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:T&T is not running out of gas soon. The prospects just lie further into deeper water meaning less return on investment. But with the US flooding the market with natural gas the prices will be low and not justify deepwater production.
Plus concurrent maintenance downtime at our refinery not helping us either.
Nevertheless, the Gov't has fail to be an early stage adjuster to mitigate against this and we are in no better situation than prior to aluminium smelter plans which would have consumed our excess natural gas.
The multinationals decided in the wake of the Deepwater Horizon incident to undertake major maintenance work on all offshore installations. This leads to gas curtailments on the Point Lisas Industrial Estate. These curtailments did not occur prior to this due to the liberation of reserves that were held by BP/BG etc in empty reservoirs to make up for shortfalls. These reserves cost money to maintain, and BP/BG etc, are no longer prepared to bear these costs alone, (they actually want the Government to fund it), and so unless someone, or PLEA steps in, we will have curtailments.
The Government has no real leverage on this, save for agreeing to foot part of the bill, which they have so far been disinclined to do,so your comments are misplaced and erroneous.
hustla_ambition101 wrote:Im part of the neither crew
j.o.e wrote:I have said before that the undecided/on the fence voter is the key to this election and its a very large group. The PP has to manage its affairs perfectly from now until elections, any major mishaps or blunders will be the thing that will sway people when they start to think in that booth. Thats the reason PP is trying to get more government airtime to drown out anything with 'good news'
Habit7 wrote:De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:T&T is not running out of gas soon. The prospects just lie further into deeper water meaning less return on investment. But with the US flooding the market with natural gas the prices will be low and not justify deepwater production.
Plus concurrent maintenance downtime at our refinery not helping us either.
Nevertheless, the Gov't has fail to be an early stage adjuster to mitigate against this and we are in no better situation than prior to aluminium smelter plans which would have consumed our excess natural gas.
The multinationals decided in the wake of the Deepwater Horizon incident to undertake major maintenance work on all offshore installations. This leads to gas curtailments on the Point Lisas Industrial Estate. These curtailments did not occur prior to this due to the liberation of reserves that were held by BP/BG etc in empty reservoirs to make up for shortfalls. These reserves cost money to maintain, and BP/BG etc, are no longer prepared to bear these costs alone, (they actually want the Government to fund it), and so unless someone, or PLEA steps in, we will have curtailments.
The Government has no real leverage on this, save for agreeing to foot part of the bill, which they have so far been disinclined to do,so your comments are misplaced and erroneous.
What I said there has not much to do with Point Lisas. I am talking about the next big revenue earner for T&T. The sound realiable industrial investments made by past govts have surpassed their crest and it is incumbent on this govt to propose something viable.
After 4 years, we are left no better than 2009.
Habit7 wrote:I think you are missing my point. In the early 90's T&T started to position itself for the windfalls from natural gas and other downstream activities. That blossomed with our last boom in early 2000's.
Now that shale gas is flooding the market, and our advantageous position is lost, what are we positioning ourselves for to earn in the next 10-20 years? We closed the door on aluminum smelting and the downstream manufacturing revenue, since then what has been proposed to earn revenue when we are sitting on cheap gas and low demand for its already established downstream industries?
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], SMc and 144 guests