again ironic.chris1388 wrote:Karl I Fedup tell you just say my name when you throwing those lil boy comments, I urge you to go back in time and prove where I ever raced outside of the current rules or past rules to win and hence make what I am speaking of now ironic or "karma".
On what basis are you SLANDERING another competitor, saying his car went from AWD to RWD for the dyno and back to AWD?chris1388 wrote: I have told you all this car was 2wd when it was on the dyno and is now 4wd.
allyuh would determine then why it was even said here.ng357 wrote:With all that said a competitor wanted to have the car checked properly and is willing to pay to contest it.
chris1388 wrote:That fair as per the rules?
wagonrunner wrote:from viewtopic.php?f=28&t=530243&p=7480383&hilit=graph#p7480383wagonrunner wrote:Lets say two vehicles of same model, so weight / suspension etc same, even same horsepower.
So by W/P rules they're in the same class, but this is the merged dyno graph.
The two cars in the graph would perform the same ent? Same weight and HP after all.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests