TriniTuner.com  |  Latest Event:  

Forums

wtk: 4g92 sohc -> 4g92 mivec conversion. worth it?

Mitsu Lancer, Evo, GSR, MIVEC, 4G**, GDI, Galant, Outlander, L200 Sportero/Triton etc.

Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods

User avatar
illumin@ti
Chronic TriniTuner
Posts: 502
Joined: September 12th, 2006, 2:10 pm
Location: Letting them hate, so long as they fear

wtk: 4g92 sohc -> 4g92 mivec conversion. worth it?

Postby illumin@ti » February 27th, 2007, 12:30 am

thinkin bout it ,, but i need to know if it would be easier to get the head, pistons and electricals,, or woulod i need the whole engine.. Since they sit on the same 4g block, i would think that the important stuff here would be the head, pistons etc.... please advise and if possible, point a brother in the right direction.

Advertisement
MIVEC95
Sweet on this forum
Posts: 287
Joined: June 16th, 2005, 8:14 pm

Postby MIVEC95 » February 27th, 2007, 8:48 am

i would keep the 4g92sohc and modify it

User avatar
MISHI
3NE 2NR Aficionado
Posts: 5436
Joined: May 14th, 2003, 4:00 pm
Location: Location: Location!
Contact:

Postby MISHI » February 27th, 2007, 9:14 am

If you're going MIVEC, get the entire engine. May cost you more in the long run with just adding parts

lowlife

Postby lowlife » February 27th, 2007, 12:00 pm

^^^^^^^^
DITTO
I would get the entire engine and change the whole head and block

MYVEC
Ricer
Posts: 15
Joined: October 14th, 2006, 2:14 pm

Postby MYVEC » February 28th, 2007, 6:39 am

I GOT A MIVEC HEAD AND ECU AND EXTRACTOR. THE MIVEC HEAD IS MISSING THE VTEC UNIT, ONE VALVE AND VALVE SPRING. CALL 724-3591 IF INTRESTED

User avatar
iamjack
3NE 2NR for life
Posts: 143
Joined: August 10th, 2006, 7:13 am
Location: central

Postby iamjack » March 11th, 2007, 11:15 am

modify the 4g92 SOHC? in the end would it have more pep than if i got the 1.6 mivec engine instead? or would it be more cost effective to modify the SOHC engine?

im in the same boat
wondering what to do with my 4g92 SOHC engine
ive got a stock local ck4 lancer

User avatar
SCHOLARS
Trinituner Peong
Posts: 435
Joined: December 29th, 2003, 1:15 pm
Contact:

Postby SCHOLARS » March 11th, 2007, 5:10 pm

I got an original ck4 mivec lancer and mivec does run but is sheit best u go 4g93t and box or 4g63t when u modify and stuff how long will it work for. i considering selling my mivec and putting in ah 4g93t or 63t. mivec does reallly burn gas

User avatar
iamjack
3NE 2NR for life
Posts: 143
Joined: August 10th, 2006, 7:13 am
Location: central

Postby iamjack » March 11th, 2007, 7:32 pm

mivec burns gas but you're going for a turbo? i thought mivec was supposed to be somehwta fuel economical until the extra cam kicks in?

User avatar
SCHOLARS
Trinituner Peong
Posts: 435
Joined: December 29th, 2003, 1:15 pm
Contact:

Postby SCHOLARS » March 12th, 2007, 6:02 pm

MIVEC is not fuel economical well mine that is but i compairing it to ah qg15 in ah adwagon and ah 4g92 non mivec and box in ah ck2 lancer

User avatar
iamjack
3NE 2NR for life
Posts: 143
Joined: August 10th, 2006, 7:13 am
Location: central

Postby iamjack » March 12th, 2007, 7:35 pm

hmmm
thats sucky since im considering getting a mivec engine for my lancer

User avatar
cinco
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 18228
Joined: January 6th, 2006, 3:21 pm
Location: Does this rag smell like chloroform to you?
Contact:

Postby cinco » March 12th, 2007, 11:29 pm

there are two diff mivec technologies
the mivec mr is the fuel saver version

Advertisement

Return to “MITSUBISHI”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests