TriniTuner.com  |  Latest Event:  

Forums

EVO X - PCJ 110 build - UPDATE OCT 24 2010

Mitsu Lancer, Evo, GSR, MIVEC, 4G**, GDI, Galant, Outlander, L200 Sportero/Triton etc.

Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods

User avatar
White CZ4A
30 pounds of Boost
Posts: 2622
Joined: April 18th, 2003, 2:08 pm

Re: EVO X - PCJ 110 build - UPDATE OCT 24 2010

Postby White CZ4A » April 24th, 2011, 8:48 am

^nice write up!
Lol@ hit it some lash like a child

User avatar
Garrett Inside
Trinituner Peong
Posts: 455
Joined: November 22nd, 2008, 10:03 pm
Location: boostin pass u dawg!!

Re: EVO X - PCJ 110 build - UPDATE OCT 24 2010

Postby Garrett Inside » April 27th, 2011, 9:30 pm

^holy crap, after that write up, ah sure hope all dem e10's ah seeing out there read it too.
It would be a shame if they start to malfunction continuously and had to park away for good.

lol at box lancer part!

User avatar
Kronik
18 pounds of Boost
Posts: 2446
Joined: July 23rd, 2004, 9:37 pm
Location: Central
Contact:

Re: EVO X - PCJ 110 build - UPDATE OCT 24 2010

Postby Kronik » April 28th, 2011, 12:15 am

i so love having my old evo, so much less problems

User avatar
MISHI
3NE 2NR Aficionado
Posts: 5474
Joined: May 14th, 2003, 4:00 pm
Location: Location: Location!
Contact:

Re: EVO X - PCJ 110 build - UPDATE OCT 24 2010

Postby MISHI » April 28th, 2011, 10:46 am

As long as people have money and a desire to use em they'll find a way to beat the system.

User avatar
W2J
3NE 2NR Power Seller
Posts: 3102
Joined: April 17th, 2003, 12:08 pm
Location: Trinidad
Contact:

Re: EVO X - PCJ 110 build - UPDATE OCT 24 2010

Postby W2J » April 28th, 2011, 12:15 pm

CARVtech wrote:Just an update on what we have learned about this (Evo X) platform so far:

EFI:
TPS and IACV are one unit and is Throttle by wire; prone to failure and usually starts out with unstable and temperamental idle. Started with the 08 models and was eventually repaired by Mitsu with a software upgrade and also a hardware upgrade. Mitsu Trinidad is not able to support these problems.
These cars literally learn how to idle.

The OEM system is very complex in how it builds final Fuel and Ignition maps. If everything (sensors) and hardware (turbo, manifolds, recirc valve, etc) are not bone stock the system quite literally gets confused..........unless you have access to base mapping, understand the ECU logic and know how to recalibrate sensors, do not play around with these cars.
The MAF Sensor is prone to failure, larger piping, poor filtration, larger flow turbos without re-calibration of the MAF signal..........it will fail.
The MAP Sensor signal feeds a logic loop in the fuel and ignition control system, if you change the basic characteristics of the induction “system” (turbo, inlet piping, intercooler, exhaust manifold) you need to re-calibrate the system so that the logic loops do not get fed data that cannot be accurately processed.
Yes all the parts in the brackets are available for these cars, plus cams and more, yes they can be fitted with no “apparent” problems to the driver, but, it takes quite a bit more to extract the bang for the buck………efficiently.
Yes any clown can read an SAE standardised engine code if the engine light comes up. Problem is that code may be “as a result of” and not because you have a hardware problem.

Boost Control:
An after-market Boost Control Unit is a complete waste of time unless the OEM system is set up to allow it. Yes you will get more boost, but you WILL NOT have proper control of ignition and fuel mapping, as within the OEM logic and algorithms the two are interlinked. It is not a simple look-up table.

Recirculation Valve:
Simple........everybody does it, replace with a BOV, the ECU hates it and you will eventually fail the system. If you want, forget the nice sneeze between shifts and fit an upgraded recirculation valve.

Keyless Entry System (KOS):
Do NOT install an after-market Security system.
DO NOT install a Turbo Timer.
If the doors are locked and the engine is on, the key is out the car, but the ignition is in the off position, the ECU/KOS/ETACS cannot handle the hard-wiring and logic. The ETACS is likely to fail, or the system can go into a high-level security shut down......Mitsu Trinidad cannot help you on their own.
There have been at least 4 that we know of, that have or had security system / ignition key problems.

ETACS:
This is the "main server" in the Mitsubishi hard wiring between all of the Electronic Control Units. All of the logic and request / approval is handled on multiple CAN Bus pairs. If you start playing with hard wiring, taking power from "just anywhere" under the dashboard or in the engine bay, you run the risk of "overloading" circuits and compromising logic loops.............you run the risk of ETACS failure.
DO NOT play around with the hard wiring in these cars. Adding systems into the electronics is a recipe for problems and if not done correctly, ETACS failure. You cannot “simulate” CAN signals, so you would not be able to “by-pass” failed systems or get around logic built into the systems, if you have partial or full ETACS failure.

CAN Protocol Networks:
This was developed by BOSCH years ago and in short it is a multiplex control system that has in-built very high level redundancy on a twisted pair hard line. Most of the OEMs are using it now and it is great, reliable and cost effective. Problem is that there is no back door for someone to get in and change things. Think of the LAN network in your office, back when people used to have a main server. All the computers were running Windows so anyone with the understanding and access rights could manipulate the system, from any terminal. Now remove Windows, throw away all the IP addresses on record, switch off all the monitors and try to print a test page on the shared printer……….yes it’s possible, but it takes someone with very special skills and understanding. To the aftermarket, this is the situation with CAN Protocol. It can be learned, it can be interfaced, it can be manipulated…………..but there are very few people that know it or have hardware interface capability.

Clutch Master Cylinder:
A big piece of plastic crap. Upgrade your pressure plate / clutch and it’s only time before the Clutch Cylinder housing separates along the stuck together bonding line. Remove the heat shielding between the turbo and the Clutch Cylinder and you will be lucky to make a down shift at the end of the highway……..especially if you were running hard through the gears on the way. Yes there are a few options for fitting a re-enforcement ring, but if you can, replace the whole thing with a more conventional cylinder assembly.

IN GENERAL:
We live in Trinidad and do not have access to Dealership Services of any reliable technical level. We are Trinidadian, so we can F*** with anything that everybody else thinks is impossible. Because of this, when you get your dream list for your X, your mechanic is not going to tell you NO.
Mitsu Trinidad cannot help you very much with these cars, there are not enough of them routinely in for service, they do not have all the interface tools required, they have to learn on your car if there is an attempt to assist you. Trinidad is not a designated support location for the X platform.
The fact with these cars is that they are so electronically complex, especially the security systems, that if you do have a problem……..yuh panda might be able to hard wire it, but I guarantee you will damage something else.
My advise: unless you want to go to the extreme with COMPLETE purpose built power modifications from proven suppliers………….do not mess about with these cars. You will spend loads of money, you will keep running into problems that you will be told are as a result of “having to do, because”, you will spend more money, you will get frustrated and then you will sell what started out to be a quirky but damned good car.
I would almost take a bet that the EVO-X’s in Trinidad are going to be locked in garages over the years, not like the previous models that you can see still driving around with no real problems. How this would affect their re-sale, I suspect very very negatively.

NONE of the aftermarket stand-alone systems are catered toward the street. They are intended for competition vehicles. The very few that offer a streetable system offer it to the USDM and are not interested (even if you are willing to pay) in testing or developing something for the JDM. If you want to keep your X on the street with “big power” you are on your own. If you do go to the likes of the “re-flash” market then you are OK, but a box Lancer with an SR going to embarrass you………bad!

This sounds all very negative, it is!
BUT, if you know what you want, know how to go about it, have the resources to do it and have support that is competent, then these cars can be great and very satisfying to the owner.

PCJ-110:
What we are doing with this car is exactly what this note warns you not to do. We are on our own and so far NOBODY has been able to offer us assistance or knowledge. This car is and continues to be a rolling test bed on the OEM control systems. The goal is not to make the most horse-power, but it is to make enough to be scary, reliably and safely, and without the loss of OEM functionality (and keep the box Lancer in the rear view). As far as we are aware some of the things we have done, and plan to do, have not been done by anyone. Some of the hardware has been custom made as will be some of the planned electronics.
Big thanks to Mitsubishi Trinidad for all the help so far (yes you in particular if you read this :wink: )
The owner is probably the most steadfast customer that I have had. This car is a huge personal pride and has been like raising a child…….it takes time to develop from scratch.
Is a pity you cannot hit it a lash an make it learn!


nice write up Mark, "Darin Dichiara" I'm sure you know the name in the tuning world who was able to leave the stock evo X ECU for the gremlins and use the Motec M400 to do his stuff with no cels. Let me know if you need a number for him.

Gerrard

User avatar
CARVtech
Street 2NR
Posts: 80
Joined: April 6th, 2010, 2:53 am
Location: Trinidad
Contact:

Re: EVO X - PCJ 110 build - UPDATE OCT 24 2010

Postby CARVtech » April 28th, 2011, 2:18 pm

W2J there are no problems with CEL codes once you know how the OEM ECU thinks. If you try manipulating the fuel tables without understanding some of the other integrated systems (like the torque monitoring) then you would end up with issues. No problem with that on this project.
The M400 is a very dated system. Should we need to I will be integrating one of my Autronic SM3 or 4 units. But, there is no need for that as the OEM ECU is quite capable if no additional functionality is required.

User avatar
W2J
3NE 2NR Power Seller
Posts: 3102
Joined: April 17th, 2003, 12:08 pm
Location: Trinidad
Contact:

Re: EVO X - PCJ 110 build - UPDATE OCT 24 2010

Postby W2J » April 28th, 2011, 7:04 pm

^ did not know you was still tuning via the stock ecu, based on the NOS and ignition system purchased I assumed you went across to the a standalone for fuel and igniton mapping with additional channels for controlling such. Tephra has alot of additional tables discovered on these ecu if you need.

User avatar
CARVtech
Street 2NR
Posts: 80
Joined: April 6th, 2010, 2:53 am
Location: Trinidad
Contact:

Re: EVO X - PCJ 110 build - UPDATE OCT 24 2010

Postby CARVtech » April 29th, 2011, 4:13 am

The nitrous system and the CDI ignition are being used solely for "out-put function". All of the controls will be off of the Mitsubishi ECU.
There is allot that can be done with the OEM ECU, especially if someone was willing to get deep into the coding and standardisations used amongst the OEMs. Quite frankly I have no time for that and will default to one of my ECU systems should the need arise (hope not to be honest).
Thanks for your help. But, like was said earlier, for what we are doing and the boundaries that are defined by the owner, we are on our own here...........just the way I like it.
It's always interesting to read about how others go about their problems and find their solutions, great way to learn for some.
When this car is done, it will still be 100% under the control of the OEM ECU systems and communication network. It would be serviceable at Mitsubishi and any of it's components would be OEM replaceable. It would also be 100% functional as was delivered by Mitsubishi to the JDM.

Again, thanks for the information you have offered.

User avatar
Porn Star
3NE 2NR Moderator
Posts: 3581
Joined: April 29th, 2003, 9:03 am
Location: suffering :-(
Contact:

Re: EVO X - PCJ 110 build - UPDATE OCT 24 2010

Postby Porn Star » August 12th, 2011, 10:29 pm

What's going on with this? Any progress?

User avatar
noobie
Street 2NR
Posts: 58
Joined: November 2nd, 2005, 3:59 pm

Re: EVO X - PCJ 110 build - UPDATE OCT 24 2010

Postby noobie » August 14th, 2011, 1:52 pm

What if you would be happy with the "stock" Evo X? Say the FQ 300 SST?

Is it still not recommended to purchase from the dealer?
Is it that they are unable to do basic repairs and servicing on the normal vehicle and parts?

User avatar
JoeBama
Riding on 17's
Posts: 1435
Joined: July 28th, 2009, 12:59 pm
Location: lurkin outside..
Contact:

Re: EVO X - PCJ 110 build - UPDATE OCT 24 2010

Postby JoeBama » September 19th, 2011, 12:02 pm

This is a great thread!

User avatar
Kronik
18 pounds of Boost
Posts: 2446
Joined: July 23rd, 2004, 9:37 pm
Location: Central
Contact:

Re: EVO X - PCJ 110 build - UPDATE OCT 24 2010

Postby Kronik » September 19th, 2011, 12:48 pm

project dead or what???

User avatar
Ragoo
Street 2NR
Posts: 43
Joined: January 13th, 2010, 10:18 am

Re: EVO X - PCJ 110 build - UPDATE OCT 24 2010

Postby Ragoo » October 24th, 2011, 2:43 pm

whats the latest with this project? any more upgrades?

User avatar
QG
punchin NOS
Posts: 3545
Joined: July 18th, 2006, 9:56 pm
Location: South

Re: EVO X - PCJ 110 build - UPDATE OCT 24 2010

Postby QG » October 24th, 2011, 5:38 pm

........

User avatar
Sanctifier
punchin NOS
Posts: 3768
Joined: June 9th, 2004, 8:09 am
Location: Good question!

Re: EVO X - PCJ 110 build - UPDATE OCT 24 2010

Postby Sanctifier » December 4th, 2011, 12:23 pm

Kronik wrote:i so love having my old evo, so much less problems
And so much easier to upgrade too! My sympathy goes out to all E10 owners... with & without LARGE wallets.
So much more to do... so much more $$$$ to spend... just to get the same level of performance, sometimes less, than
Image, RalliArt and so many others achieved nearly 13 years ago.

Not knocking anyone's opinion, especially the OP. IMHO kudos to him for a VERY brave move and a great "build"... but the "heads-up" from CARVtech... and now PROZAC's opinion as a new E10 owner himself... Edit: Evo X - really how bad ? Moving from Silvia to Evo8:... confirms my doubts and continued dislike of the E10 (upgrade $$$, excessive weight & intrusive electronic control - engine & handling)... and strengthens my continued obsession with my E6 RS2. Link--> ~ Readers' Rides ~

My $0.02¢

16 cycles
3ne2nr Toppa Toppa
Posts: 5547
Joined: May 10th, 2003, 9:25 am

Re: EVO X - PCJ 110 build - UPDATE OCT 24 2010

Postby 16 cycles » April 25th, 2012, 10:34 am

saw this on the cover of an issue of 6th speed magazine....not sure if latest...only picked it up after a long day yesterday....for those who still interested in the build...

User avatar
Sanctifier
punchin NOS
Posts: 3768
Joined: June 9th, 2004, 8:09 am
Location: Good question!

Re: EVO X - PCJ 110 build - UPDATE OCT 24 2010

Postby Sanctifier » April 25th, 2012, 5:43 pm

^ ^ ^ ... Link?

16 cycles
3ne2nr Toppa Toppa
Posts: 5547
Joined: May 10th, 2003, 9:25 am

Re: EVO X - PCJ 110 build - UPDATE OCT 24 2010

Postby 16 cycles » April 26th, 2012, 9:52 am

^ i looked for one online but 6th speed hasn't put it up as yet....

got my copy at the privilegio (sp) @ movietowne for ~25TT

Messi
3NE 2NR for life
Posts: 148
Joined: October 20th, 2006, 1:23 pm

Re: EVO X - PCJ 110 build - UPDATE OCT 24 2010

Postby Messi » April 28th, 2012, 2:33 pm

Idk why all the hate against the evo x I had a FTP red cosworth camped FBO water meth tuned reliably 400whp and had zero issues. I know it still ain't big power but some posters here knock the x as if it's the worst evo when in fact it has the best technology. Some of the posters here have been knocking the car since the day it came out. Personally I always feel you should drive one long term and stop reading reviews and then make ur own conclusions. Look at BMW. They are doing the forced induction route. Same thing here. All thensoncalled purists are aghast! Get with the new trends!

User avatar
Sanctifier
punchin NOS
Posts: 3768
Joined: June 9th, 2004, 8:09 am
Location: Good question!

Re: EVO X - PCJ 110 build - UPDATE OCT 24 2010

Postby Sanctifier » April 28th, 2012, 5:29 pm

Kronik wrote:i so love having my old evo, so much less problems
Sanctifier wrote:Not knocking anyone's opinion, especially the OP. IMHO kudos to him for a VERY brave move and a great "build"...

...confirms my doubts and continued dislike of the E10 (upgrade $$$, excessive weight & intrusive electronic control - engine & handling)...
No hate there, my friend... just dislike... Feel free to disagree with me at any time... It's only my newbie opinion...
Sanctifier wrote:My dislike is for the unnecessary EXTRA 800 lbs. of an Evo X MR compared to Evo 6 RS...
My dislike is for the unnecessary EXTRA electronic complexity that prevents 2nrs from easily doing engine & drivetrain upgrades...
My dislike is for the unnecessary EXTRA COST of those upgrades... compared to older Evo models, even today.
...(Evo X) has the best technology... Okay, if you want to pay so much more, no problem my friend.
I prefer to stick with older models...for the same level of performance @ lower prices.
As I said, it's only my opinion... that's only worth $0.02¢ anyhow. No biggie.
Sanctifier wrote:Because of the extra complexity and cost involved, this Evo X build interests me even more than usual.

My $0.02¢ 8-)

Messi
3NE 2NR for life
Posts: 148
Joined: October 20th, 2006, 1:23 pm

Re: EVO X - PCJ 110 build - UPDATE OCT 24 2010

Postby Messi » April 28th, 2012, 11:25 pm

Don't wanna clutter op,S thread with this clutter. I have read ur posts numerous times. No comment.

User avatar
Rooki3
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 7219
Joined: December 18th, 2008, 10:52 pm

Re: EVO X - PCJ 110 build - UPDATE OCT 24 2010

Postby Rooki3 » April 28th, 2012, 11:37 pm

:lol:

User avatar
Porn Star
3NE 2NR Moderator
Posts: 3581
Joined: April 29th, 2003, 9:03 am
Location: suffering :-(
Contact:

Re: EVO X - PCJ 110 build - UPDATE OCT 24 2010

Postby Porn Star » May 2nd, 2012, 4:45 pm

I love my Evo X.
No problems, comfortable, and 95% of most evo owners on here cant catch me on the way to maracas.

User avatar
MISHI
3NE 2NR Aficionado
Posts: 5474
Joined: May 14th, 2003, 4:00 pm
Location: Location: Location!
Contact:

Re: EVO X - PCJ 110 build - UPDATE OCT 24 2010

Postby MISHI » May 2nd, 2012, 4:53 pm

I don't know the way to maracas... does that make it 96%?

meterboy
Riding on 13's
Posts: 3
Joined: May 2nd, 2012, 8:34 am

Re: EVO X - PCJ 110 build - UPDATE OCT 24 2010

Postby meterboy » May 2nd, 2012, 9:30 pm

what's the latest on the car? :D

User avatar
Morpheus
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 10729
Joined: July 22nd, 2004, 2:24 am

Re: EVO X - PCJ 110 build - UPDATE OCT 24 2010

Postby Morpheus » May 2nd, 2012, 10:14 pm

Says the man with the FQ..... :| . :lol:

BTW when you see 2 ppl gaping at your car park up on evenings is just me and a "friend" ok :oops:

EDIT: Well "cars" now........

User avatar
DVSTT
Trying to catch PATCH AND VEGA
Posts: 6759
Joined: November 28th, 2011, 9:11 pm

Re: EVO X - PCJ 110 build - UPDATE OCT 24 2010

Postby DVSTT » November 4th, 2012, 10:24 pm

See this car regular in a house before Jenny's Wok! Looks awesome!

User avatar
wagonrunner
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 13496
Joined: May 18th, 2004, 9:38 am
Location: Distancing myself from those who want to raid the barn but eh want to plant the corn.
Contact:

Re: EVO X - PCJ 110 build - UPDATE OCT 24 2010

Postby wagonrunner » November 4th, 2012, 10:32 pm

Car was on the highway tonight.
Some erratic driving. Wondered if it was detuned.

User avatar
White CZ4A
30 pounds of Boost
Posts: 2622
Joined: April 18th, 2003, 2:08 pm

Re: EVO X - PCJ 110 build - UPDATE OCT 24 2010

Postby White CZ4A » November 5th, 2012, 7:12 am

this car was sold by the OP about 6 months ag0.
Now has a new owner.

User avatar
venum
3NE2NR Diesel Boyz
Posts: 5996
Joined: May 7th, 2004, 3:19 pm
Location: San Fernando

Re: EVO X - PCJ 110 build - UPDATE OCT 24 2010

Postby venum » November 8th, 2012, 9:56 pm

^^^ ditto

Advertisement

Return to “MITSUBISHI”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests