4G92 vs 6A12

[fras]

4G92 Mivec vs 6A12 Mivec... Pros & cons?

[fras]

On paper the 6A12 makes more power and has a wider power band...

4G92 Mivec
Total Displacement — 1,597 cc
Engine type — 4-cylinder DOHC 16-valve MIVEC
Compression Ratio — 11:1
Maximum Output — 128 kW (174 PS; 172 bhp) at 7,500 rpm
Maximum Torque — 167 N·m (123 ft·lbf) at 7,000 rpm

6A12 Mivec
Total Displacement - 1,998 cc
Engine type — 6-cylinder DOHC 24-valve MIVEC
Compression ratio — 10.0:1
Peak power — 147 kW (200 PS; 197 hp) at 7500 rpm
Peak torque — 200 N·m (148 lb·ft) at 6500 rpm

[rollingstock]

I'm guessing a lancer?

The 4g92 would be an easier swap, lighter, at an 11:1 compression ratio it may knock with super????

6A12, heavier, 10:1 ratio so super normal, more top end, heavier (suspension upgrade), more fabrication to instal?
Then axles etc

Then you have to look at brake upgrades for both.

Was looking at a 6a12 non mivec swap for the galant, almost direct swap and no need to upgrade brakes, just in case the gdi acts up (knocks on wood) It hasn't though.

6A12 DOHC
Displacement — 1998 cc
Bore — 78.4 mm
Stroke — 69.0 mm
Engine type — V type 6-cylinder DOHC 24-valve (Mivec)
Compression ratio — 9.5:1, 10.0:1, 10.4:1
Fuel system — ECI multi
Peak power — 107–110 kW (145–150 PS; 143–148 hp) at 6000–6750
Peak torque — 179–181 N·m (132–133 lb·ft) at 4000–4500


4G93 DOHC 16 Valve GDI

Gasoline Direct Injection (GDI)
Total Displacement - 1834cc
Bore - 81.0mm
Stroke - 89.0mm
Compression Ratio - 12.0:1
Maximum Output -

Japan: 96 kW (131 PS; 129 bhp) @ 5,500 rpm / 96 kW (131 PS; 129 bhp) @ 6,000 rpm / 110 kW (150 PS; 148 bhp) @ 6,500 rpm
Maximum Torque -
Japan: 181 N·m (133 ft·lbf) @ 3,500 rpm / 177 N·m (131 ft·lbf) @ 3,750 rpm / 178 N·m (131 ft·lbf) @ 5,000 rpm