Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
rollingstock wrote:Google "case law"
Thank me after.
Fackery. If the law has been shown to be inadequate, it can be amended and rolled back out via Parliament
Redman wrote:Fackery. If the law has been shown to be inadequate, it can be amended and rolled back out via Parliament
Maybe.
But doesn’t a PC decision settle interpretation ?
Redman wrote:Fackery. If the law has been shown to be inadequate, it can be amended and rolled back out via Parliament
Maybe.
But doesn’t a PC decision settle interpretation ?
De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:Fackery. If the law has been shown to be inadequate, it can be amended and rolled back out via Parliament
Maybe.
But doesn’t a PC decision settle interpretation ?
It still doesn't change the law If Arse-Wari is waiting for the PC to point out that the legislation is flawed, or inadequate, or vague, by his own admission btw, then why go to the PC? Is it to frustrate and victimize citizens in the interim of an election year?
So you blindly follow sometime cause a person say so?Redman wrote:De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:Fackery. If the law has been shown to be inadequate, it can be amended and rolled back out via Parliament
Maybe.
But doesn’t a PC decision settle interpretation ?
It still doesn't change the law If Arse-Wari is waiting for the PC to point out that the legislation is flawed, or inadequate, or vague, by his own admission btw, then why go to the PC? Is it to frustrate and victimize citizens in the interim of an election year?
Interpretation of statute law is what influences how the law is applied on a case by case level.
That is what the AG stated.
zoom rader wrote:So you blindly follow sometime cause a person say so?Redman wrote:De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:Fackery. If the law has been shown to be inadequate, it can be amended and rolled back out via Parliament
Maybe.
But doesn’t a PC decision settle interpretation ?
It still doesn't change the law If Arse-Wari is waiting for the PC to point out that the legislation is flawed, or inadequate, or vague, by his own admission btw, then why go to the PC? Is it to frustrate and victimize citizens in the interim of an election year?
Interpretation of statute law is what influences how the law is applied on a case by case level.
That is what the AG stated.
I know hes wrong .Redman wrote:zoom rader wrote:So you blindly follow sometime cause a person say so?Redman wrote:De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:Fackery. If the law has been shown to be inadequate, it can be amended and rolled back out via Parliament
Maybe.
But doesn’t a PC decision settle interpretation ?
It still doesn't change the law If Arse-Wari is waiting for the PC to point out that the legislation is flawed, or inadequate, or vague, by his own admission btw, then why go to the PC? Is it to frustrate and victimize citizens in the interim of an election year?
Interpretation of statute law is what influences how the law is applied on a case by case level.
That is what the AG stated.
If you think he is wrong...say so, say why.
The people that see no issue with the AG are all PNM stooges and are only toting the line.Redman wrote:Well yes his rational is logical....and having chatted about it when the AG made the statement with people that in the business, they see no issue.
So getting a PC decision on an area of law that the Jason Jones case....will settle how that and other laws that are derivative of that law....are applied.
So now you state why he is wrong.
That's how dictators operate .rspann wrote:I pass the stage of deciphering fairys intentions. It could be really to get a definitive decision on the sedition law so that he would know how to apply it for future cases or it could be ( which I rather suspect) just plain maliciousness and bad mind against any opposition to the edicts of his adored leader the mighty baldheaded vulgar one. What is the importance of pushing this ? He really believe sat and the rapper\ singer the mighty Duke has any seditious intents? What threat are they to anybody far less the govt( Duke is not even a formidable threat in any elections right now and sat is just a ole miserable injun who like to bump his gum. ) ?
Why he don't go after the ones who posing a real threat to the country? The is supporters, the men who putting their ARs on Facebook and who shooting up town? A man who was actually shoot up parliament and take over the country, they couldn't do anything, why the sudden interest in sedition.Monkey really know which branch to climb.
I feel u is eliterspann wrote:Before I get my party card they make me swear that no matter what I am not to bad talk the party and I can never leave. So no matter how bad it get, I voting PNM. Is Shitkickers and his gang I against.
rspann wrote:A man who was actually shoot up parliament and take over the country, they couldn't do anything
Yeahredmanjp wrote:rspann wrote:A man who was actually shoot up parliament and take over the country, they couldn't do anything
Didn't Bakr have a Sedition case against him as well?
zoom rader wrote:I feel u is eliterspann wrote:Before I get my party card they make me swear that no matter what I am not to bad talk the party and I can never leave. So no matter how bad it get, I voting PNM. Is Shitkickers and his gang I against.
Dat nutting new , I get ban for dat alreadyrspann wrote:zoom rader wrote:I feel u is eliterspann wrote:Before I get my party card they make me swear that no matter what I am not to bad talk the party and I can never leave. So no matter how bad it get, I voting PNM. Is Shitkickers and his gang I against.
If I was a mod, I ban your arse every time you say PNM.
rspann wrote:Before I get my party card they make me swear that no matter what I am not to bad talk the party and I can never leave. So no matter how bad it get, I voting PNM. Is Shitkickers and his gang I against.
I here longer than most like PNM , bantanamao is small change.rspann wrote:I admire yuh belly though. As you come out of bantanamo ,you start again. Like you ain't fraid.
zoom rader wrote:I here longer than most like PNM , bantanamao is small change.rspann wrote:I admire yuh belly though. As you come out of bantanamo ,you start again. Like you ain't fraid.
Doh jugde me on my past illegal convictions
zoom rader wrote:The people that see no issue with the AG are all PNM stooges and are only toting the line.Redman wrote:Well yes his rational is logical....and having chatted about it when the AG made the statement with people that in the business, they see no issue.
So getting a PC decision on an area of law that the Jason Jones case....will settle how that and other laws that are derivative of that law....are applied.
So now you state why he is wrong.
Redman wrote:zoom rader wrote:The people that see no issue with the AG are all PNM stooges and are only toting the line.Redman wrote:Well yes his rational is logical....and having chatted about it when the AG made the statement with people that in the business, they see no issue.
So getting a PC decision on an area of law that the Jason Jones case....will settle how that and other laws that are derivative of that law....are applied.
So now you state why he is wrong.
Can you now state why you think he is wrong?
What d hell yuh go post in that?zoom rader wrote:We need to start an arse wari and young achievement chead
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 148 guests