Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
jjacelon1 wrote:the thing is, although the Constable Stupidees and dem can't legally make u remove the tint, unfortunately they know that are in their right to detain you until License officers arrive to do it themselves.
And on top of that, the tickets they give us is not for the tint itself but rather for "dis-obeying the instruction of an officer of the law"... raaated, blood-clat, fassie hole dem. Den dey wonder y d country doh trust Police.
AbstractPoetic wrote:Oh, but looky here:
"Seetahal said the Act gave the Licensing Authority power over motorists' tints and not the police."
She references the "current law" to support her above opinion.
Way to go, Seetahal!
So according to the Act, and not Seetahal, you are still subjected to removal by the Licensing Authority.
AbstractPoetic wrote::rofl:
So because there is no clear tint law (no clear measuring stick for what is considered legal and what is not), you are ready to claim victory? To say you have been wronged and should sue?
If you read carefully, Seetahal is talking out of her bum bum. She does not reference any legislation to support her argument.
According to Seetahal, it is an "abuse of power" because:
- "Current laws also do not give Trinidad and Tobago police officers the authority to make drivers physically remove tints from their car windows or windshields"
- "There is no power in law for police to make drivers remove their tints"
Any attorney would know that they would need supporting evidence to validate those statements.
As of today, Seetahal is only making a statement. A claim. An opinion. She has not used anything in the "current law" to support her rant.
But because she is a "reputable attorney" she must be right?
Excuse me while I roll over my floor, laughing.
RBphoto wrote:I think reflective tints should be legal on all surfaces except the front windshield, which should not have the same 6" strip stipulation I believe. We live in the tropics and it makes sense to have a highly reflective tint.
eliteauto wrote:RBphoto wrote:I think reflective tints should be legal on all surfaces except the front windshield, which should not have the same 6" strip stipulation I believe. We live in the tropics and it makes sense to have a highly reflective tint.
reflective tint is not necessarily the most effective tint when dealing with UV/heat
similarly to ppl who think the darker the better, I sometimes wonder if it's stupidity or a sense of self-importance that makes a person tint a vehicle G5 or lower
RBphoto wrote:
What is the most effective then?
stev wrote:do we have anything in trinidad to determine the tint transparency? or do we just rely on the officers with sunglasses to tell us if its dark or not?
RBphoto wrote:All right then.. what shops have the ceramic and what is the cost to tint a tiida
Kronik wrote:I think tint nation has it. They on the forum, located in chasevillage
suntek website wrote: CXP™ - Non-Metal, Nano-Hybrid, Carbon Construction
Carbon™ - Non-Metal, Non-Fading, Carbon Construction
InfinityOP™ - Sputtered, All-Metal Construction
High Performance - Dyed-Metal, Hybrid Construction
Standard - Dyed Construction
TINT NATION wrote:
These films are:
Standard 35%, 20% and 5% ( single ply)
High Performance 20% & 35% (Double Ply)
Titanium 35% (Double Ply)
Carbon XP 18% & 35% (Double Ply)