Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
bluefete wrote: So Paul described his experiences in the only way that he had at hand. His point was not to tell us how many levels of heaven there might really be. His point was to tell us that he had powerfully encountered the presence of God, in fact that he had physically seen the risen Christ.
megadoc1 wrote:that's your problem right there,you were brief because you ignore lots of stuff right where you grab the very stuff that puzzles you .the issue comes from your Muslim worldview and what they teach ,concerning what puzzles you,there is nothing that can be said to help you understand, unless you abandon the corrupt information you gathered from those who spoke on what puzzles you nowHSA wrote:this puzzles me....please clarify briefly as i did
HSA wrote:megadoc1 wrote:that's your problem right there,you were brief because you ignore lots of stuff right where you grab the very stuff that puzzles you .the issue comes from your Muslim worldview and what they teach ,concerning what puzzles you,there is nothing that can be said to help you understand, unless you abandon the corrupt information you gathered from those who spoke on what puzzles you nowHSA wrote:this puzzles me....please clarify briefly as i did
All that said and still u didnt clarify anything....i am asking for info..not opposing any1..
Yes the views i have make me think a particular way but that doesnt mean i am not open to new concepts..
So again...can som1 clarify this??
bluefete wrote:matr1x wrote:I love when the religious try to adopt science to fit into their delusional fantasy.
They call it metaphor, I call it bs
That is because you do not understand that people of ancient times did not use the terms we use today.
It is not a question of religion adopting science but science proving religion.
For example, it is said that the theory of gravity was not 'discovered' until the 1600's by Isaac Newton.
But long before that, the Bible mentioned the earth being hung out in space. No science, per se, but very accurate, nonetheless.
HSA wrote:jesus was sent by the father right??
why worship the son when you can worship the father?
then the father, son and holy ghost are one??
if the father sent jesus and he does miracles by him, then did jesus send himself to die for your sins??
if he did send himself then who was watching heaven, managing death/life etc. while he was on earth??
this puzzles me....please clarify briefly as i did
or is it you think you have to go through jesus to reach the father??
if so then muslims have a higher level of spirituality than christians...they worship the lord directly...
timelapse wrote:Christianity- A retold story about Mithra.Plagiarism at its best IMO
sMASH wrote:Platonic philosophy: 1+1+1=1
meccalli wrote:HSA wrote:jesus was sent by the father right??
why worship the son when you can worship the father?
then the father, son and holy ghost are one??
if the father sent jesus and he does miracles by him, then did jesus send himself to die for your sins??
if he did send himself then who was watching heaven, managing death/life etc. while he was on earth??
this puzzles me....please clarify briefly as i did
or is it you think you have to go through jesus to reach the father??
if so then muslims have a higher level of spirituality than christians...they worship the lord directly...
And it came to pass, that, as he was praying in a certain place, when he ceased, one of his disciples said unto him, Lord, teach us to pray, as John also taught his disciples.
Yeshua said to them, “When you pray, you shall say thus: 'Our Father, who are in Heaven' Luke 11
Jesus taught his disciples to pray to God. Jesus receives worship in the same way that the king who is God's messiah on earth does, moreso with Christ who has been given all authority by God for his work.
And David said to all the congregation, Now bless the LORD your God. And all the congregation blessed the LORD God of their fathers, and bowed down their heads, and worshipped the LORD, and the king. 1 Chronicles 29:20
We can however come to a holy God in our sins because of the intermediary that Jesus now is which is how the tradition of praying in his name developed. It's asking Christ to take our requests to his father as his own, so that through his righteousness, that our prayer might be known.
My little children, I am writing these things to you so that you will not sin. But if anyone does sin, we have an advocate before the Father--Jesus Christ, the Righteous One. 1 John 2:1timelapse wrote:Christianity- A retold story about Mithra.Plagiarism at its best IMO
Peter Joseph lied so much in zeitgeist, he couldn't even respond to criticism by actual historians who actually knew what they were talking about, of course the herd mentality and ignorant atheists were gladly swallowing it down with their eyes closed, and evidently still are.sMASH wrote:Platonic philosophy: 1+1+1=1
This revelation has made it certain that two and one make three, and that one is not three nor can three be one. We can never be so certain of any prophecy, or the fulfillment of any prophecy, or of any miracle, or the design of any miracle, as we are from the revelation of nature, i. e., Nature’s God, that two and two are equal to four. Miracles or prophecies might frighten us out of our wits; might scare us to death; might induce us to lie, to say that we believe that two and two make five. But we should not believe it. We should know the contrary.
Had you and I been forty days with Moses on Mount Sinai, and been admitted to behold the divine Shekinah, and there told that one was three and three one, we might not have had courage to deny it, but we could not have believed it.
John Adams to Thomas Jefferson
QUINCY, September 14, 1813
It is too late in the day for men of sincerity to pretend they believe in the Platonic mysticisms that three are one, and one is three; and yet that the one is not three, and the three are not one…
Jefferson to John Adams.
Monticello, August 22, 1813.
timelapse wrote:You want to talk about herd mentality?
actually its multiple books ,atleast make an attempt to educate your self on the matter nahtimelapse wrote:
Compared to a belief where its one and only book corroborates itself?
sMASH wrote:correct. except, he was a historical figure, being engaged in business, politics, and war, there were some details of various undertakings remaining till today.
there were two notable foretelling of his coming in the the bible and the hindu texts.
i can remember that the bible foretold that one is to come after jesus, like unto moses. many of the life details of both prophets were similar. i cant remember if that contained the detail that the one to come is the 'comforter' or if its another verse which has it, but the 'comforter' or the one to come was assumed to be the holy ghost. but the holy ghost was already there, so it technically cannot be yet to come... if u here already that would mean u would be coming again, not yet to come.
the english word 'comforter' wasnt the best translation from the greek. the orginal greek word that they got 'comforter' from, more represents muhammed (pbuh)
the hindu texts spoke of a man from the lands with sands, being called the praiseworthy.. muhammad means the praise worthy.
or is it ahmad.. but both names were used for him... as he fulfilled both qualities any way.
matr1x wrote:bluefete wrote:matr1x wrote:I love when the religious try to adopt science to fit into their delusional fantasy.
They call it metaphor, I call it bs
That is because you do not understand that people of ancient times did not use the terms we use today.
It is not a question of religion adopting science but science proving religion.
For example, it is said that the theory of gravity was not 'discovered' until the 1600's by Isaac Newton.
But long before that, the Bible mentioned the earth being hung out in space. No science, per se, but very accurate, nonetheless.
While that's a bit of a stretch, I get what you are trying to say. But please know you are wrong. Cherry picking and saying "ah ha! They might of had an observation about one thing therefore the whole book is true" is utter nonsense.
Not saying that ancient people would not have made observation that could one day form the fundamental of gravity, but a flaky mention of an object hung (which is wrong to begin with) doesn't mean the whole thing is legitimate.
bluesclues wrote:sMASH wrote:correct. except, he was a historical figure, being engaged in business, politics, and war, there were some details of various undertakings remaining till today.
there were two notable foretelling of his coming in the the bible and the hindu texts.
i can remember that the bible foretold that one is to come after jesus, like unto moses. many of the life details of both prophets were similar. i cant remember if that contained the detail that the one to come is the 'comforter' or if its another verse which has it, but the 'comforter' or the one to come was assumed to be the holy ghost. but the holy ghost was already there, so it technically cannot be yet to come... if u here already that would mean u would be coming again, not yet to come.
the english word 'comforter' wasnt the best translation from the greek. the orginal greek word that they got 'comforter' from, more represents muhammed (pbuh)
the hindu texts spoke of a man from the lands with sands, being called the praiseworthy.. muhammad means the praise worthy.
or is it ahmad.. but both names were used for him... as he fulfilled both qualities any way.
Hardly
The comforter in John 14 is the Holy Spirit. Here is what he said.
If you wish to consider yourself a true follwer and believer you will follow his advice on the way to achieve the kingdom of God. And that while you are on that path and showing dilligence, the father will send a 'helper'/comforter. The Spirit of Truth(Holy Spirit). The world cannot accept him because it neither sees him nor knows him. But you will know him for he lives with you and IN YOU.
If you want Muhammad to live in you that is your choice. But this spirit is meant as a guide to all who are following the path.
I can speak from personal experience. His spirit comes and teaches you things day in day out, guides your life choices, builds faith and trust and obedience. Holding your hand through life and spiritual tests in life. and when you have done it all as required and reached the pinnacle, God fills you with that spirit. When you gain the Holy spirit it stays with you all day every day and night and never leaves. You feel it in you 24/7. It is like water, flowing through the body. And that is what it feels like. Like your whole body all the flesh is just a container for some kind of water that can pass through matter. But you feel it passing.. pressure, force and currents within currents.
That is what he talking about.
Most important thing to note though is that man cant name prophets. Man doesnt get to choose that. Could be billion ppl VOTE that someone should be a prophet and they may not be by God. Allah has to name Muhammad as a prophet. Nobody else.
Neither the church. All the men they name saints may not be named saints by God. And many men who are never named and were never named by the church or the pope, were saints by God.
sMASH wrote:u take so much of the bible words to be literal,when the source of the bible spake in so much parables...
sMASH wrote:i accusing u of talking out ur arse.
HSA ,check this out if you really want to learn what Christians believe so you can have a better understanding of it.HSA wrote:megadoc1 wrote:that's your problem right there,you were brief because you ignore lots of stuff right where you grab the very stuff that puzzles you .the issue comes from your Muslim worldview and what they teach ,concerning what puzzles you,there is nothing that can be said to help you understand, unless you abandon the corrupt information you gathered from those who spoke on what puzzles you nowHSA wrote:this puzzles me....please clarify briefly as i did
All that said and still u didnt clarify anything....i am asking for info..not opposing any1..
Yes the views i have make me think a particular way but that doesnt mean i am not open to new concepts..
So again...can som1 clarify this??
I guess you are that important huh?matr1x wrote:Some speak in parables, I say they speak parrot bottom
sMASH wrote:correct. except, he was a historical figure, being engaged in business, politics, and war, there were some details of various undertakings remaining till today.
there were two notable foretelling of his coming in the the bible and the hindu texts.
i can remember that the bible foretold that one is to come after jesus, like unto moses. many of the life details of both prophets were similar. i cant remember if that contained the detail that the one to come is the 'comforter' or if its another verse which has it, but the 'comforter' or the one to come was assumed to be the holy ghost. but the holy ghost was already there, so it technically cannot be yet to come... if u here already that would mean u would be coming again, not yet to come.
the english word 'comforter' wasnt the best translation from the greek. the orginal greek word that they got 'comforter' from, more represents muhammed (pbuh)
the hindu texts spoke of a man from the lands with sands, being called the praiseworthy.. muhammad means the praise worthy.
or is it ahmad.. but both names were used for him... as he fulfilled both qualities any way.
York wrote:The name of Muhammad in the Bible was Ahmad which they "erased". The "Comforter" in John 14:16 ...well it's actually "another" comforter. The word was translated Paraclete but another close translation arranging the vowels would be Ahmad, the praised one!
So how many are there? and if it is the Holy Spirit which is part of GOD then the Trinity is mathematically incorrect. It should be at least four instead of three.
There are narrations dating back 1400+ yrs ago when the Jews were reading their scripture and they placed their finger on the word "Ahmad" that was written.
No one here can doubt that the Bible has been tampered with...
timelapse wrote:Shall I go on?
York wrote:The name of Muhammad in the Bible was Ahmad which they "erased". The "Comforter" in John 14:16 ...well it's actually "another" comforter. The word was translated Paraclete but another close translation arranging the vowels would be Ahmad, the praised one!
So how many are there? and if it is the Holy Spirit which is part of GOD then the Trinity is mathematically incorrect. It should be at least four instead of three.
There are narrations dating back 1400+ yrs ago when the Jews were reading their scripture and they placed their finger on the word "Ahmad" that was written.
No one here can doubt that the Bible has been tampered with...
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 146 guests