Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
stev wrote:I can't help but wonder....was the scene with the baby (Craster's son) all for nothing?
way back in whatever season...
Dizzy28 wrote:Bran had so much potential that he wasted
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:I watched it on Amazon Prime on a plasma tv with the lights off and the picture was mostly fine. There was some banding but it wasn’t too dark to see.
tr1ad wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:I watched it on Amazon Prime on a plasma tv with the lights off and the picture was mostly fine. There was some banding but it wasn’t too dark to see.
always ranking ting with you eh
tr1ad wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:I watched it on Amazon Prime on a plasma tv with the lights off and the picture was mostly fine. There was some banding but it wasn’t too dark to see.
always ranking ting with you eh
hong kong phooey wrote:tr1ad wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:I watched it on Amazon Prime on a plasma tv with the lights off and the picture was mostly fine. There was some banding but it wasn’t too dark to see.
always ranking ting with you eh
yeah pictures of your amazon account and passwords or you lie
hydroep wrote:So...apparently you can get away with less detail/substandard CGI quality by darkening an entire scene.
Speculation is they cheapened out on the effects in this episode so they would have a greater budget for the upcoming 'daylight' battle at King's Landing.
The 'darkening for effect' reason was just an excuse...
hydroep wrote:So...apparently you can get away with less detail/substandard CGI quality by darkening an entire scene.
Speculation is they cheapened out on the effects in this episode so they would have a greater budget for the upcoming 'daylight' battle at King's Landing.
The 'darkening for effect' reason was just an excuse...
hydroep wrote:So...apparently you can get away with less detail/substandard CGI quality by darkening an entire scene.
Speculation is they cheapened out on the effects in this episode so they would have a greater budget for the upcoming 'daylight' battle at King's Landing.
The 'darkening for effect' reason was just an excuse...
hydroep wrote:^You can't tell from that.
Don't confuse the SFX budget with the CGI budget. The latter is a subset of the former.
Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:hydroep wrote:^You can't tell from that.
Don't confuse the SFX budget with the CGI budget. The latter is a subset of the former.
But you can tell cuz it’s dark for some?
imagine talking like this irlhydroep wrote:^You can't tell from that.
Don't confuse the SFX budget with the CGI budget. The latter is a subset of the former.
hydroep wrote:Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:hydroep wrote:^You can't tell from that.
Don't confuse the SFX budget with the CGI budget. The latter is a subset of the former.
But you can tell cuz it’s dark for some?
Eh?...
I think people were expecting more from the episode and are looking for reasons to not like it. I think the problem was making it a one episode fight. It is impossible to satisfy 8 years of buildup with one event. I agree it was dark and they had some Christopher Nolan close up shaky fight scenes that are just plain horrible, but for the most part, other than those two ponts, I don't think they could have done much more for the episode. The special effects and action in this episode was already on par with some of the biggest hollywood movies like Pirates of the Caribbean and a lot of the Marvel movies. I don't think cheapening out was the issue. Remember this is still just one episode for one season of one show on one TV station. Kinda crazy that they took it this far! I think the task they were faced with was impossible to begin with.Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:hydroep wrote:So...apparently you can get away with less detail/substandard CGI quality by darkening an entire scene.
Speculation is they cheapened out on the effects in this episode so they would have a greater budget for the upcoming 'daylight' battle at King's Landing.
The 'darkening for effect' reason was just an excuse...
This doesnt look like they cheapened out
Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:hydroep wrote:Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:hydroep wrote:^You can't tell from that.
Don't confuse the SFX budget with the CGI budget. The latter is a subset of the former.
But you can tell cuz it’s dark for some?
Eh?...
You saying one can’t tell from the behind the scenes video showing the great lengths they went to but you believe they made it dark to cut corners on cgi because *some* people found it was too dark?
Take it easy there Benioffst7 wrote:what a disappointing episode.
Poor army tactics... would have kept most of everyone inside the wall, have the melee men by the trenches while it's on fire and have archers fire flaming arrows at the wights, have the dragons circle about Winterfell and bun up the wights.
keep bran inside the walls, have him warg into the crows and do scouting. let Night King come to them...
What should have happened was that NK retreat cause he eh really winning and losing wights. head south, attack more villages/towns and build up his army as he make his way to King's Landing. Big battle with ensues with Golden Company, and the Northern army decide to attack the undead from behind, basically sandwiching them.
Then Cersei and them use Wildfire which ends up killing the NK (who knows if that would have actually worked considering...)
So now there are both armies, celebrating that victory for a few mins before Cersei break the truce and the war continues... it would have kept up momentum.
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:CNET offers some tips for adjusting your TV properly so movies and shows with dark scenes look better
https://www.pscp.tv/w/1lDxLrbAlymGm?t=2m37s
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google Feedfetcher, Kritical01 and 146 guests