Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
[X]~Outlaw wrote:Duane you really have patience!!
Under the SOE Our military takes their directives from our elected CIVILIAN government.
Under Martial Law, the Military would have installed itself as the government and take their directives from military leaders.
We are not under martial law.
Greypatch wrote:So from a ................
Limited State of emergency to a full one.
Curfew in hot spots to everywhere...
looks like the pm...ag...cop...and sandy...ARE ALL LOOKING FOR THEIR ARSE HOLE BY THEIR ELBOW
AbstractPoetic wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:YES our constitutional rights have been curtailed by the SOE, but we are NOT under martial law!!!
Is it really that difficult to understand?
Not me and you today, nah.
So if your constitutional rights have been curtailed what's the new order of the day?
I have already stated there is some aspects of martial law in effect, what I earlier coined as quasi-martial law. YES, in the strictest sense, martial law exists only when the military takes over total law enforcement of the country. That's the pure definition.
However, in T&T, the military, police & other government protective services are working together. The military hasn't superseded the authority of the other arms of the protective services. Therefore, T&T is under a type of quasi- Martial Law but your constitutional rights have been placed on hold, most definitely.
Dizzy28 wrote:Vinegar in freedom tastes better than honey in slavery.
I would rather have some constitutional rights placed temporarily on hold if it means a permanent solution to the bondage we are placed under by criminals and the lawless in society. Nothing good ever comes without sacrifice.
AbstractPoetic wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:Vinegar in freedom tastes better than honey in slavery.
I would rather have some constitutional rights placed temporarily on hold if it means a permanent solution to the bondage we are placed under by criminals and the lawless in society. Nothing good ever comes without sacrifice.
Assuming this solely has to do with a war on crime, you should be more concerned that you have a government that cannot control its crime rates without encroaching on your civil liberties.
bluefete wrote:
You yourself know that those many of those boys on the block are simply agents for the big fish. They cannot even begin to finance $1 million in imported cocaine.
Country_Bookie wrote:The Express seems to be dedicated to creating bachannal and controversy at every opportunity. Remember the property tax is back story from 2 weeks ago that turned out to be a lie? Whatever it takes to sell papers eh. Maybe they should have handed the order that was signed by the Acting Commish, to clear up his misconception, as it clearly states the areas under curfew.
crossdrilled wrote:With all the beat up about crime, I still think this is all to do with curtailing the unions promise of anarchy. Seems nobody wants to discuss this?
mars wrote:bluefete wrote:
You yourself know that those many of those boys on the block are simply agents for the big fish. They cannot even begin to finance $1 million in imported cocaine.
True to some extent, but don't be fooled: some of those same "sufferers" on the block ARE the big fish. I know of one "community leader" (and URP kingpin), who when he was gunned down at age 27 left about $20 MILLION in cash along with 7 houses and numerous cars. Also, there are guys pulling down 6 figures a month from DVD "vending". Guess what they're doing with all that money? De "small man" my a@#!!!!!
Habit7 wrote:Country_Bookie wrote:The Express seems to be dedicated to creating bachannal and controversy at every opportunity. Remember the property tax is back story from 2 weeks ago that turned out to be a lie? Whatever it takes to sell papers eh. Maybe they should have handed the order that was signed by the Acting Commish, to clear up his misconception, as it clearly states the areas under curfew.
Express not sensationalising anything they have direct quotes from the man, not only did he saying curfew everywhere, he refute anything otherwise.
If not it, it is $100,000 misspeak
dougla_boy wrote:i think to call an SOE to fight crime is a waste of power....what is the purpose of putting the gang laws? this just sets a precedent for upcoming gov'ts to call a SOE for a pack of SΉΙΤ.....
cinco wrote:dougla_boy wrote:i think to call an SOE to fight crime is a waste of power....what is the purpose of putting the gang laws? this just sets a precedent for upcoming gov'ts to call a SOE for a pack of SΉΙΤ.....
you prefer calling a SoE to get rid of the speaker of the house?
7day memory FTL
Bezman wrote:short of doing exactly what they are doing now, what else would they have done? you have heard from soldiers themselves state that the raids etc couldnt have been done without the aid of the army
you couldnt make all those arrests and raid all those houses etc without warrants.
you couldnt ensure that all these gang members etc will be home without a curfew (even if they are not home they hiding somewhere indoors and not galavanting the street committing crime)
i realizing the ppl complaining either living away and have no real idea how 90% of the ppl you talk to support the LSOE or they are anti PP/UNC etc and just complaining for complaining sake..
NONE of allya would be complaining if they did nothing and Monday morning we all awoke to town being looted and people being kill in the street becuase some riot/strike got out of control because nelson street and lavantille/betham youths see it as a escuse to loot etc (watching riots in london/syria/lybia)
this has more to do with stopping social unrest and using the power given by LSOE (or full SOE) to try to clean up certain areas with one swoop..
If the polls were saying different i would say you are right, but with the majority of ppl in support, maybe you should start thinking about why the people are ready for this and want it.. if they didnt the entire country would eb getting on like those warahoons on nelson street..
Habit7 wrote:Bezman wrote:short of doing exactly what they are doing now, what else would they have done? you have heard from soldiers themselves state that the raids etc couldnt have been done without the aid of the army
you couldnt make all those arrests and raid all those houses etc without warrants.
you couldnt ensure that all these gang members etc will be home without a curfew (even if they are not home they hiding somewhere indoors and not galavanting the street committing crime)
i realizing the ppl complaining either living away and have no real idea how 90% of the ppl you talk to support the LSOE or they are anti PP/UNC etc and just complaining for complaining sake..
NONE of allya would be complaining if they did nothing and Monday morning we all awoke to town being looted and people being kill in the street becuase some riot/strike got out of control because nelson street and lavantille/betham youths see it as a escuse to loot etc (watching riots in london/syria/lybia)
this has more to do with stopping social unrest and using the power given by LSOE (or full SOE) to try to clean up certain areas with one swoop..
If the polls were saying different i would say you are right, but with the majority of ppl in support, maybe you should start thinking about why the people are ready for this and want it.. if they didnt the entire country would eb getting on like those warahoons on nelson street..
Many trinis support the SOE, what we dont like is how they are going about it, even the opposition initially supported it but comdemned the detention of gang members which could have been done outside of the SOE and the lack of gun and drug finds because of ample time to stash them.
dougla_boy wrote:cinco wrote:dougla_boy wrote:i think to call an SOE to fight crime is a waste of power....what is the purpose of putting the gang laws? this just sets a precedent for upcoming gov'ts to call a SOE for a pack of SΉΙΤ.....
you prefer calling a SoE to get rid of the speaker of the house?
7day memory FTL
i wasnt around for that time....cant really say much about that....
cinco wrote:dougla_boy wrote:cinco wrote:dougla_boy wrote:i think to call an SOE to fight crime is a waste of power....what is the purpose of putting the gang laws? this just sets a precedent for upcoming gov'ts to call a SOE for a pack of SΉΙΤ.....
you prefer calling a SoE to get rid of the speaker of the house?
7day memory FTL
i wasnt around for that time....cant really say much about that....
u werent around in 92???
go n pee and go in yuh bed yes
smell wrote:Men only talking bout getting the root cause and getting the "big fish" and i totally agree, but how do you expect the police to kno who is the big fish?!
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], ttphilip and 191 guests