Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
rollingstock wrote:So forkin fake it's too funny.
rspann wrote:Scariest part of this whole debacle is that we see the intelligence of our PM being exposed for the world to see.
If the emails were not real ,why try to prove that they are? The AG and Nat Sec ministers also agree they are real.
If however by some stretch of reality they are real, then why did you appoint someone who was deeply involved in it to head the Police Service?
If there are those here who believe Growlers, just answer my question and help me to see the rationale.
rspann wrote:I agree, but the only explanation I would venture is that they wanted to protect their private calls and messages( we don't know what they might have on the phone that needed to be hidden/removed other than what pertained to the investigation) or was scared of the police and reporters making their business public. This is a real threat in TT where we see the police leaking pics and info all the time. You could imagine if they handed up their phones and then we find out about Horner man/ Goat/woman , money , bribes etc? The irrelevant data was filtered by the FBI from what they revealed and then the rest was analyzed for the investigation.
Redman wrote:Is it beyond normal expectations to think that the Pres has the ability to move fast?
Idunno...but given the politics now and at the time...I would have come straight to parliament.
Let the chips fall...
Apparently it worked faster than the Pres..
sMASH wrote:Redman wrote:Is it beyond normal expectations to think that the Pres has the ability to move fast?
Idunno...but given the politics now and at the time...I would have come straight to parliament.
Let the chips fall...
Apparently it worked faster than the Pres..
how de arse reading a murder plot under parliamentary privilege ( so no body could sue u for defamation) gonna save the guardian reporter?
... 6 months after the disclosure??
The_Honourable wrote:Unless Growlers was waiting for the murder to pop off so the emailgate case would have been a slam dunk in the court of public opinion to call an early election back then (2013) while he can easily say that he got some info and did take it to the President to act but they stick and not he?
rspann wrote:Growlers saying he took it to the parliament and raised a motion for an investigation. I saw the vid of the parliamentary session last night. The joker raised a motion of no confidence. He like to lie or is it memory loss?
Redman wrote:rspann wrote:Scariest part of this whole debacle is that we see the intelligence of our PM being exposed for the world to see.
If the emails were not real ,why try to prove that they are? The AG and Nat Sec ministers also agree they are real.
If however by some stretch of reality they are real, then why did you appoint someone who was deeply involved in it to head the Police Service?
If there are those here who believe Growlers, just answer my question and help me to see the rationale.
One can infer so much from everybody's actions.
Some where earlier on here I said they both full of chit.
If KPB was innocent why the fight to hand over evidence and the refusal to do so when she and crew met with the TTPS ?
We confronted with a PM that may have created or been duped.
We have an ex PM who went to great lengths to avoid being investigated but" has nothing to hide" ....alongside Israel and the foreign data expert.
We have a CoP who sent in his gadgets early on now leading the charge. Plea bargain.
And we have that chithong Volney saying it true.....
The only inescapable conclusion one can draw is that we in a frisking mess when it comes to the political directorate.
rspann wrote:Everybody avoiding answering why did he put Gary as COP if he thinks there is any merit in the allegations.
K_J_R wrote:rspann wrote:Everybody avoiding answering why did he put Gary as COP if he thinks there is any merit in the allegations.
very true. strange to see not much comments on this
if gary was alleged to be in the plot and if rowley still says it is real, then is he saying that he put somone who was implicated in a plot to murder, to the position of COP?
that alone is proof that he knows it is false.
De Dragon wrote:K_J_R wrote:rspann wrote:Everybody avoiding answering why did he put Gary as COP if he thinks there is any merit in the allegations.
very true. strange to see not much comments on this
if gary was alleged to be in the plot and if rowley still says it is real, then is he saying that he put somone who was implicated in a plot to murder, to the position of COP?
that alone is proof that he knows it is false.
Not really, if it is one thing that JUHN Scarfy excels at, it is putting friends/financiers/family in the position they are worst at.
Malcolm Jones to Petrotrin.
Ken Julien to UTT.
Roundabout Rohan to MoW.
Weavy to Planning
Arse-Wari to AG.
Two Plate to Public Admin.
Impsy to MoF
Rainbow Archie to CJ.
Squeeze bamsee to MoS.
War on Salt to MoH
Goebbels Young to anything.
rspann wrote:De Dragon wrote:K_J_R wrote:rspann wrote:Everybody avoiding answering why did he put Gary as COP if he thinks there is any merit in the allegations.
very true. strange to see not much comments on this
if gary was alleged to be in the plot and if rowley still says it is real, then is he saying that he put somone who was implicated in a plot to murder, to the position of COP?
that alone is proof that he knows it is false.
Not really, if it is one thing that JUHN Scarfy excels at, it is putting friends/financiers/family in the position they are worst at.
Malcolm Jones to Petrotrin.
Ken Julien to UTT.
Roundabout Rohan to MoW.
Weavy to Planning
Arse-Wari to AG.
Two Plate to Public Admin.
Impsy to MoF
Rainbow Archie to CJ.
Squeeze bamsee to MoS.
War on Salt to MoH
Goebbels Young to anything.
Well tell we wey you woulda put them nah?
That is a losing hand no matter where you put them. Growlers making me seriously think about voting for kamla and she bunch next time.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 225 guests