Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Gasmonkey wrote:Question is Why didnt the CAL pilot Respond to the tower
This is not an issue with the checklist. His frequency would have been on the tower to give him clearance to land on his final approach, about 5miles out. Sometime between then and him leaving the runway the radio frequency was changed.maj. tom wrote:wrong frequency? pilot eh go over the checklist? he will have to answer to the man.
But you know, these machines have pretty advanced systems now; you would think that they should have linkup with the tower and safety programming to avoid this automatically.
Look at this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tenerife_airport_disaster
Habit7 wrote:CAL pilots still learning this big airport thing. They only know runway and taxiway or land on the runway, spin around and come down the opposite way.
zoom rader wrote:Habit7 wrote:CAL pilots still learning this big airport thing. They only know runway and taxiway or land on the runway, spin around and come down the opposite way.
Well blame the PNM for that, BWIA never had those issues and landed at Heathrow, JFK with no problems.
Habit7 wrote:zoom rader wrote:Habit7 wrote:CAL pilots still learning this big airport thing. They only know runway and taxiway or land on the runway, spin around and come down the opposite way.
Well blame the PNM for that, BWIA never had those issues and landed at Heathrow, JFK with no problems.
http://www.compasscayman.com/caycompass ... ear-Miami/
desifemlove wrote:Ent JFK air traffic control supposed to manage this, and report on goings on in their vicinity? what about the other airliner? didn't they have radar too?
Habit7 wrote:Pilot error is the number one cause of accidents, not a political party. You don't have to bring politics in everything ZR.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 307 guests