Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
she knows its a waste of time, is the donkeys pushing for it she trying to protect.redmanjp wrote:so pelosi send d articles yet?
Sanders Field Organizer: "If You Can't Handle Me At My Most Communist, You Don't Deserve Me At My Most Anarchist"
Posted By Tim Hains
On Date January 15, 2020
James O'Keefe
@JamesOKeefeIII
BREAKING: Bernie Staffer Kyle Jurek “I’m an Anarcho-communist…I'm as far left as you can possibly get...There’s a lot of me’s in the @BernieSanders campaign...”
"He's(Kyle Jurek) fabulous" - Holly Hallman, Bernie Iowa Field Organizer
In a follow-up to their video of a campaign organizer for Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders endorsing gulags, James O'Keefe's Project Veritas released this clip of the same staffer politically identifying himself as "an Anarcho-communist."
"I'm as far to left as you can possibly get," he said during a conversation secretly filmed by Project Veritas. "In fact, there are, that I know of, one, two, three, four of the organizers in this office are leftists, Justin me, Derek, Daniele, Jessica are all definitely further left than the Democratic socialists."
"If you can't handle me at my most communist, you don't deserve me at my most anarchist," he joked.
"There’s a lot of me's in the Sanders campaign," he also said.
The_Honourable wrote:Impeachment has been a dud for Democrats
Is there a law against boring people to death? There should be, and Adam Schiff should be the first indicted.
As the California representative has tried to convince Americans…again… that Donald Trump should be impeached and removed from office, he has stultified not only TV audiences across the nation, but also the senators who by law have to pay attention to him. Talk about cruel and unusual punishment.
It is hard to imagine that such a profound undertaking – the overturning of an American election – could emerge as such a dramatic dud. But it has, and the reason is simple. Schiff orchestrated the impeachment inquiry in the House of Representatives in such a way as to render the partisan outcome predictable, and undermined his own effectiveness by leaking every interesting snippet that was damaging to the president.
Schiff presided over secret committee hearings in rooms closed off to the press and the country, only popping his head up from time to time like a Jack-in-the-Box to rip the president for trying to find out what the heck Hunter Biden was doing in Ukraine.
And, trying to determine whether the corrupt country had intervened in our elections. That possibility is roundly rejected by the left-wing chorus as “widely discredited”; in fact, that aggressive dismissal makes me wonder. When Democrats read in unison from a script, there’s usually a reason.
By the time the full House and the country got to hear the charges against the president, during endless hours of debate, most Americans had already heard the flimsy facts of the case, and were becoming less impressed by the day.
More: https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house ... -democrats
maj. tom wrote:what i can't understand, and someone who keeps updated on the USA clown circus explain to me, is why....why the ass would Trump, would any POTUS, ask another country to investigate the former vice-president? Why would he just go up to Ukraine and say "investigate Joe Biden for me." Why ????
Doesn't the US President have meetings with the Heads of the CIA, FBI and NSA? Couldn't he just ask one of them to compile a report for his eyes only? Why would he ask Ukraine or China for these things? Someone explain please.
sMASH wrote:impeachment should persist because to me, its like a 'right to recall', in that if they do something that police cant directly arrest for, its a mechanism for citizens to get a person out of office for not acting in line with what they want. no appointment should be for better or for worse, all should have a way out, to put someone better if its not being done.
y i think this impeachment is wrong is that i do think that a president should ahve the right and the ability to investigate wrong doing using the tools available to him. asking a foreign government to do something might be irregular, but not illegal or incorrect. its like two states agreeing to pursue a matter.
but, even tho i think this impeachment is a silly matter, its because of the reason. ut, there are other things that are better things to impeach him for. things like tpp, nafta, the non creation of jobs, that he promised, the use of the strike to assissinate the foreign military man(it was within his power to do, just an abuse of that power). but dems probably acting on this cause they have actual provable evidence to use in a hearing. so...
this is why i admire american politics. the people at the top, tend to be the best at their game. u can disagree with their decision, but hardly ever accuse them of being incompetent . as opposed to trinidad, the only merit they have is the position that they have, u can see hear feel experience that they dont know they ass from they elbow, and only there as yes men.
american politics, they are yes men, but chosen from the top 1% of the top 1%.
like comey, i disagreed with him for the clinton trials, but the man gave sound reasons for is actions. trey gowdey during that same situation. republican, came up with great challenges to comey, and great approaches.
EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:De Dragon to be fair, impeachment is largely just the opposition refusing to accept a democratic election results. You can disagree all you want but that is how the general public is going to view this and the dems will be hated even more.
Unless tulsi or Bernie is going up against trump the dems are dead in 2020
maj. tom wrote:what i can't understand, and someone who keeps updated on the USA clown circus explain to me, is why....why the ass would Trump, would any POTUS, ask another country to investigate the former vice-president? Why would he just go up to Ukraine and say "investigate Joe Biden for me." Why ????
Doesn't the US President have meetings with the Heads of the CIA, FBI and NSA? Couldn't he just ask one of them to compile a report for his eyes only? Why would he ask Ukraine or China for these things? Someone explain please.
redmanjp wrote::agrue:EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:De Dragon to be fair, impeachment is largely just the opposition refusing to accept a democratic election results. You can disagree all you want but that is how the general public is going to view this and the dems will be hated even more.
Unless tulsi or Bernie is going up against trump the dems are dead in 2020
It's that plus a way of blocking him from looking into possible Ukraine linked corruption of not just Biden but other Dems (according to Giuliani).
All the time they were just talking impeachment, as soon as he looked into Ukraine they actually did it.
My question is should a President not have the right to look into corruption assuming there is a suspicion of it? Should he be required to look the other way just because it happens to be a political opponent? So that person just gets away with it?
Only time will tell if these allegations pan out
EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:De Dragon to be fair, impeachment is largely just the opposition refusing to accept a democratic election results. You can disagree all you want but that is how the general public is going to view this and the dems will be hated even more.
Unless tulsi or Bernie is going up against trump the dems are dead in 2020
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: alfa and 157 guests