Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Strugglerzinc wrote:Whatever this sheit is, it ain't Star Trek.
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:Strugglerzinc wrote:Whatever this sheit is, it ain't Star Trek.
People probably said the same thing of Star Trek: The Next Generation when it started in 1987 before it became wildly popular. I don't think Discovery will top TNG in ratings tho.
MG Man wrote:brickman wrote:MG Man wrote:watched ep3 last night...interesting show, but still not feeling that Roddenberry vibe....
Feels too jj trek still.
yup
I know they reaching for a big arc-style story and maybe the kids nowadays like that kinda deal, but I feel like 3 eps in, it's gonna be too much about conspiracies and plot twists than the whole 'humanity reaching the stars' vibe
Kirk had it
Picard had it
Sisko had it
Janeway had it...damn she's one touch woman
Archer really embodied it, the way he and Tucker personified humanity's stumbling first steps....heck even the Browncoats make more sense
SSSavage wrote:I personally think this new start trek is crap.
Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:Spore drives must be inherently flawed. Only way it doesn’t perpetuate into TNG, Voyager timelines.
Also how does one explain the drastic looks of the Klingons?
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 87 guests