Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
It's a backpeddle by the DPPboxy wrote:Lol that's what u interpret by that article
pugboy wrote:them Sealots boys might take a page out of sat book every time they get searched and nothing found
Dizzy28 wrote:pugboy wrote:them Sealots boys might take a page out of sat book every time they get searched and nothing found
Are they going to get RLM and Jagdeo Singh to represent them each time though??
randolphinshan wrote:zoom rader wrote:PNM should learn by now not to mess with Sat.
He may just win his upcoming cases against PNM[/quote
He just might, but who cares ? The most important thing is Keith will be our next PM to continue the progress while Satee boy will most likely continue to get arrested and charged for his idiotic and you will get banned from Tuner for yours
Slartibartfast wrote:
Talking to Sat about child marraige. Thoughts?
Rovin wrote:why all of randol posts always seem to be so bitter about everything
d feller like he does be in such an uptight mood when he posting on tuner , relax urself nuh ....
Hes an Eleit bloggermaj. tom wrote:he's a paid "blogger." Dunno why people even reply to him, knowing that. Same with the recent one-eyed prig who just happened to join tuner the day after McDonald got arrested to do PNM damage control. Social media presence and propaganda is very much a job today that did not exist 10 years ago.
I really just wanted to know under what context could that have possibly made sense. People seem to forget that he grew up in an extremely different time. Instead of trying to prove him wrong I'm more fascinated by what used to make sense to us less than a lifetime ago.l33t2 wrote:Slartibartfast wrote:
Talking to Sat about child marraige. Thoughts?
You have rel patience, I get you're trying to get his side out, but on this issue he's extremely backward and it must have been hard not to call him out.
Slartibartfast wrote:I really just wanted to know under what context could that have possibly made sense. People seem to forget that he grew up in an extremely different time. Instead of trying to prove him wrong I'm more fascinated by what used to make sense to us less than a lifetime ago.l33t2 wrote:Slartibartfast wrote:
Talking to Sat about child marraige. Thoughts?
You have rel patience, I get you're trying to get his side out, but on this issue he's extremely backward and it must have been hard not to call him out.
I'm 100% against child marraige but just think about how crazy it is that the practice was not just acceptable, but actually the norm just a couple decades ago. Imagine what would be the norm 100 years from now.
But Sat was left alone, where his organisation built schools that brought his people from being illiterate to highly educate especially his women folk in a span of 60 years. . The man pulled his people out of the dumps. If anything he broke down caste system where education is concern within his group.88sins wrote:allyuh eh observe something.
Most Hindus that are under the age of about 40 don't take Sat seriously. They see him as a jokey ancient relic of a time long gone. Those few that do follow his train of thought only do so because they can benefit from doing so.
I actually believe that if you leave it to Sat, he'd reinstitute the caste system and other aspects of the Hindu culture that the majority of people that practice Hinduism do not want, such as the bride's parents having to pay the groom's parents a dowry for their daughter to marry, among other things.
Sat is a old bad joke.
zoom rader wrote:But Sat was left alone, where his organisation built schools that brought his people from being illiterate to highly educate especially his women folk in a span of 60 years. . The man pulled his people out of the dumps. If anything he broke down caste system where education is concern within his group.88sins wrote:allyuh eh observe something.
Most Hindus that are under the age of about 40 don't take Sat seriously. They see him as a jokey ancient relic of a time long gone. Those few that do follow his train of thought only do so because they can benefit from doing so.
I actually believe that if you leave it to Sat, he'd reinstitute the caste system and other aspects of the Hindu culture that the majority of people that practice Hinduism do not want, such as the bride's parents having to pay the groom's parents a dowry for their daughter to marry, among other things.
Sat is a old bad joke.
People say trini hindus have caste, just look around at the non hindu and you will observe a larger local caste system in place.
Eg 1% is greater than everyone else, they don't allow their folk to mix and marry outside their community.
Beetham and Laventille people are the untouchables , no one wants to deal with them.
Slartibartfast wrote:I really just wanted to know under what context could that have possibly made sense. People seem to forget that he grew up in an extremely different time. Instead of trying to prove him wrong I'm more fascinated by what used to make sense to us less than a lifetime ago.l33t2 wrote:Slartibartfast wrote:
Talking to Sat about child marraige. Thoughts?
You have rel patience, I get you're trying to get his side out, but on this issue he's extremely backward and it must have been hard not to call him out.
I'm 100% against child marraige but just think about how crazy it is that the practice was not just acceptable, but actually the norm just a couple decades ago. Imagine what would be the norm 100 years from now.
l33t2 wrote:That's fine, and always good to get that perspective as you can learn quite a bit. But I get the feeling he doesn't think his archaic view is wrong, I know people from that generation who got married at 14 but would never recommend or think it ok if their grandchildren did the same.
Little to none Dalits was recuited for indenturedship. Cause they knew nothing about agriculture and was of no use.88sins wrote:zoom rader wrote:But Sat was left alone, where his organisation built schools that brought his people from being illiterate to highly educate especially his women folk in a span of 60 years. . The man pulled his people out of the dumps. If anything he broke down caste system where education is concern within his group.88sins wrote:allyuh eh observe something.
Most Hindus that are under the age of about 40 don't take Sat seriously. They see him as a jokey ancient relic of a time long gone. Those few that do follow his train of thought only do so because they can benefit from doing so.
I actually believe that if you leave it to Sat, he'd reinstitute the caste system and other aspects of the Hindu culture that the majority of people that practice Hinduism do not want, such as the bride's parents having to pay the groom's parents a dowry for their daughter to marry, among other things.
Sat is a old bad joke.
People say trini hindus have caste, just look around at the non hindu and you will observe a larger local caste system in place.
Eg 1% is greater than everyone else, they don't allow their folk to mix and marry outside their community.
Beetham and Laventille people are the untouchables , no one wants to deal with them.
believe what you will, but Sat didn't do that, & I honestly doubt that educating females was high on his list of priorities back then. The laws of T&Tis what made that possible, since it was made mandatory that all children, regardless of gender or religion MUST attend primary school at the very least. Thus the development of our free education system, open and available to all chidren.
I sure if you left it to him, the only education girls back then & now would receive is how to make a proper roti, how to keep house & to make children.
There is a sort of informal caste system in T&T, and there is also an informal tiered elitist sytem in place as well, & ppl don't genrally like to think about either of them much. But save for their few similarities(degrees of separatism, etc), they are two entirely different things. One is based on who you are or what family you were born into, while the other is primarily based on what you have & who you know & who knows you. So as a result getting into the elite in society is easy enough (make enough $$ & big wig pals & you basically in the upper echelons of society), while the getting out of the caste system is rather dificult since you are supposedly born into it & the only way to escape it is through alteration of your lineage, which is impossible, or the lineage of future generations, which can be done, but is not easy since a Brahmin beta would never be allowed by his parents to marry a Dalit beti.
Both systems are kaka in my book, but whoever want to live their life like that I glad for them, feel free, me eh business
But I eh entertaining nobody bringing either one around me cus I don't prescribe to either.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 129 guests