Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
zoom rader wrote:one eye wrote:Sad thing is a number of people will still vote that dutty thieving UNC.
Can you explain who stole in the UNC and when is their court date?
Redman wrote:zoom rader wrote:one eye wrote:Sad thing is a number of people will still vote that dutty thieving UNC.
Can you explain who stole in the UNC and when is their court date?
Ask Anil
rofl
zoom rader wrote:Redman wrote:zoom rader wrote:one eye wrote:Sad thing is a number of people will still vote that dutty thieving UNC.
Can you explain who stole in the UNC and when is their court date?
Ask Anil
rofl
Like you licking one eye arse?
When is Anil Court Date?
Redman wrote:zoom rader wrote:Redman wrote:zoom rader wrote:one eye wrote:Sad thing is a number of people will still vote that dutty thieving UNC.
Can you explain who stole in the UNC and when is their court date?
Ask Anil
rofl
Like you licking one eye arse?
When is Anil Court Date?
But is YOU who excited by Anil form.
Anil eh need a court to prove he is waste of time.
Again-form over substance-you in the right camp.
Redman wrote:To go down your insipid pointless line of thought.
If its only Panday that make a jail.....who in the PNM make a jail??
Your Hypocrisy is evident-you condemn because its PNM but clearly of applying an even yardstick- hoist yourself on your own petard much?
A man is innocence until proven guilty as far as I know in TT
Redman wrote:aha so we change the goalpost-so when ZR says:A man is innocence until proven guilty as far as I know in TT
Its true until it doesnt support your bigoted POV
Like I said you and Anil are a good pair.
Rovin wrote:so jr rodello damn lie bout he son being employed by d govt , dise small ting , if was a unc person d public wuda be like resign now ....
Rovin wrote:d story in todays guardian , he admitted it when somebody showed evidence of d cheque with he son name on it
peenmites go say well kamla dem billions so dise small ting .....
Redman wrote:So lets see the pots sitting on their own bottom now.
Thats some Nickel and Dime sheeit
Rovin wrote:so jr rodello damn lie bout he son being employed by d govt , dise small ting , if was a unc person d public wuda be like resign now ....
De Dragon wrote:Red Plastic Bag like he fall down? All of a sudden he stop replying, when Regrello thievery and nepotism got shown.
Well root cause was the injun contractor did a bad paving job.shake d livin wake d dead wrote:We getting it done
Ahh boi...thor's political hammer.shake d livin wake d dead wrote:We getting it done
Settlement ‘flawed’
Dr Sheila Rampersad
THE Ministry of Sport and Youth Affairs’ (MSYA) $150,000 settlement of a wrongful dismissal claim made by sexual harassment accuser Carrie-Ann Moreau was “irregular and fundamentally flawed”.
And the people identified by the three-member investigating committee as “principally responsible for the manner in which the allegations of sexual misconduct were handled, and the manner in which Ms Moreau’s trade dispute was conducted and settled by the MSYA (including the payment to Ms Moreau of the sum of $150,000) are the former minister (Darryl Smith), permanent secretary (Joan) Mendez, permanent secretary (Ian) Ramdahin, deputy permanent secretary (Denise) Arneaud, PS (Natasha) Barrow, and (MSYA Legal Officer II) Ms (Judith) Joseph.”
The investigating committee’s final report has been obtained by the Sunday Express.
‘Deliberate failure’
The 47-page report on the circumstances surrounding allegations of sexual harassment made against former sport minister Darryl Smith by his former personal secretary Carrie-Ann Moreau, committee chairman Jacqueline Wilson and members Folade Mutota and Elaine Green concluded:
“There was a deliberate failure to provide the PD (Personnel Department of the Chief Personnel Officer) with the necessary instructions in the matter. We find that this was done to ensure that the matter could be contained within the MSYA and any potential damage to the former Minister could be minimised. The cost of the damage control was agreed by those concerned to be $150,000 of public funds. While we accept that it was Ms (Judith) Joseph who communicated the instructions to Mr (Michael) Quamina to settle at $150,000, we find that PS Ramdahin agreed to this amount when he was Ag Permanent Secretary in the MSYA and that DPS Arneaud was also likely aware of this matter.”
The investigating committee painstakingly tracked meetings and correspondence related to Moreau’s sexual harassment complaint through the public service bureaucracy from sometime before February 2016—when Moreau took her complaints to permanent secretary Joan Mendez—to January 27, 2017—when the Industrial Court issued its order after the $150,000 cheque was signed and handed over to Moreau.
In its investigations, the committee was assisted by a former director of legal services at the Personnel Department (PD) and a former chief personnel officer (CPO).
CPO Office excluded
Observing that the PD “appeared to have been deliberately excluded from any involvement in negotiating the settlement reached with Ms Moreau and/or the ATU (Advocate Trade Union) on her behalf”, the committee found that the PD should and must have been engaged, and have conduct of the process, whether the matter was settled or proceeded to trial.
In arriving at this finding, the Committee noted that the CPO is deemed, by law, to be Moreau’s employer.
The committee further compared the ministry’s handling of the Moreau dispute to two current trade disputes in the Industrial Court brought by former MSYA contract employees, Shabaka Kambon and Gina Granado.
Both of those cases, the committee’s report noted, are being handled by lawyers from the Solicitor General’s Office and PD, unlike the Moreau matter.
“We were also specifically advised by Ms (Judith) Joseph that trade disputes fall within the delegated responsibility of the relevant Ministry and the PD,” said the report. “The PD was not, however, involved in any fashion with negotiating the settlement with Ms Moreau.”
The committee did not accept that “a trade dispute by political staff, whether or not it involves allegations of sexual harassment as in this case, can be handled transparently within the Ministry in which they (the allegation) arise.”
Cabinet approval
In addition, the committee found that Cabinet approval was required for the settlement but was not sought.
The report noted that “...since the allegations in this case involved the personal conduct of a Cabinet Minister, it was for the Cabinet to determine if they were prepared to accept collective responsibility for the allegations concerning the former Minister’s conduct, which involved not improper ministerial conduct but improper personal conduct by the former Minister.”
The committee noted it was advised by the former director, Legal Services at the PD and the former CPO, that the PD would have sought and obtained the approval of Cabinet before finalising any settlement and making any payment to Moreau.
This is one of the problems I have with PNM ppl and the rest of tuner PNM kunts on here.shake d livin wake d dead wrote:Going for another 500+ murder count....only under a pee on dem govt this happens
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: foreignused and 226 guests