Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
nos_specialist wrote:Well. 1 LAWYERS..
I did my purchase via a so called reputable lawyer in sanfernando..
Other transactions were done by d guy and other ppl by other lawyers and stuff..
And well everybody has some kinda stake in it. So I paused everything until this sorts out.
U did any search before purchasing itnos_specialist wrote:Well. 1 LAWYERS..
I did my purchase via a so called reputable lawyer in sanfernando..
Other transactions were done by d guy and other ppl by other lawyers and stuff..
And well everybody has some kinda stake in it. So I paused everything until this sorts out.
Sorry to hear that man...Hope u get solved out in your situationnos_specialist wrote:Thats the thing, I hired a..reputable.. lawyer
To do the correct things for me to purchase. He indicated the search was done, everything good. So I went with the Purchase.
Crazy shiet, yes. I have learnt though. So for now i jus holding on to see what would happen
nos_specialist wrote:Thats the thing, I hired a..reputable.. lawyer
To do the correct things for me to purchase. He indicated the search was done, everything good. So I went with the Purchase.
Crazy shiet, yes. I have learnt though. So for now i jus holding on to see what would happen
Well true that my land ain't that old..the lease only out about the date the vecep and shut downing of caroni 1975Phone Surgeon wrote:nos_specialist wrote:Thats the thing, I hired a..reputable.. lawyer
To do the correct things for me to purchase. He indicated the search was done, everything good. So I went with the Purchase.
Crazy shiet, yes. I have learnt though. So for now i jus holding on to see what would happen
many lawyers only search back a certain amount of years. 20 or 30 i think
so if a issue crop up 21 or 31 or 50 years ago....they not going to see it
You can carry him before the disciplinary committeenos_specialist wrote:The land was also purchased by another person 2 years prior to me. When I asked the lawyer about it, he just brushed it off and say People can make all kinda agreements..
But the thing is.. it was a registered agreement...
I learned a lot about deeds, searching, registration and stuff after...
And well trying to take a lawyer to court...yea cant do that
urbandilema wrote:U did any search before purchasing itnos_specialist wrote:Well. 1 LAWYERS..
I did my purchase via a so called reputable lawyer in sanfernando..
Other transactions were done by d guy and other ppl by other lawyers and stuff..
And well everybody has some kinda stake in it. So I paused everything until this sorts out.
Me u asking?pm meMADMAN1 wrote:urbandilema wrote:U did any search before purchasing itnos_specialist wrote:Well. 1 LAWYERS..
I did my purchase via a so called reputable lawyer in sanfernando..
Other transactions were done by d guy and other ppl by other lawyers and stuff..
And well everybody has some kinda stake in it. So I paused everything until this sorts out.
May i ask the location of this Piece of Land..
urbandilema wrote:Me u asking?pm meMADMAN1 wrote:urbandilema wrote:U did any search before purchasing itnos_specialist wrote:Well. 1 LAWYERS..
I did my purchase via a so called reputable lawyer in sanfernando..
Other transactions were done by d guy and other ppl by other lawyers and stuff..
And well everybody has some kinda stake in it. So I paused everything until this sorts out.
May i ask the location of this Piece of Land..
nos_specialist wrote:The land was also purchased by another person 2 years prior to me. When I asked the lawyer about it, he just brushed it off and say People can make all kinda agreements..
But the thing is.. it was a registered agreement...
I learned a lot about deeds, searching, registration and stuff after...
And well trying to take a lawyer to court...yea cant do that
But he says it was sold/registered two years ago, which means the attorney would have known if a search was done, providing it was registered as stated above.rspann wrote:Can't really blame the lawyer. If when he did the search and it was clear he made the agreement and then the owner went and did other transactions (by other lawyers as you said) there was nothing he could have done. It's plain fraud on the owners part if these transactions were done during the time the deed was being registered . If you were the first one to pay and you completed the transaction before the others, then yours would have been the only valid transaction. The others would have to take him to court for redress.
I bought a property in the west and the owner did the same thing ,sold( well really took downpayments) about ten other people. My deed was registered and the others were left empty handed. He went to Barbados and lived until he died a few years ago, and nobody ever got back their money.
*KRONIK* wrote:nos_specialist wrote:The land was also purchased by another person 2 years prior to me. When I asked the lawyer about it, he just brushed it off and say People can make all kinda agreements..
But the thing is.. it was a registered agreement...
I learned a lot about deeds, searching, registration and stuff after...
And well trying to take a lawyer to court...yea cant do thatBut he says it was sold/registered two years ago, which means the attorney would have known if a search was done, providing it was registered as stated above.rspann wrote:Can't really blame the lawyer. If when he did the search and it was clear he made the agreement and then the owner went and did other transactions (by other lawyers as you said) there was nothing he could have done. It's plain fraud on the owners part if these transactions were done during the time the deed was being registered . If you were the first one to pay and you completed the transaction before the others, then yours would have been the only valid transaction. The others would have to take him to court for redress.
I bought a property in the west and the owner did the same thing ,sold( well really took downpayments) about ten other people. My deed was registered and the others were left empty handed. He went to Barbados and lived until he died a few years ago, and nobody ever got back their money.
It possible the attorney took his money and never did the search and went ahead to prepare the deed.
And it also goes to show the kinda ppl it have out there...selling land to more than 1 person.
The seller is definitley most at fault as he would have done this intentionally to rob 2 parties of their money.
Somebody should deal with he @$$.
Yeah I feel it going own still as ppl advertising and deeds not even out yet for itPhone Surgeon wrote:*KRONIK* wrote:nos_specialist wrote:The land was also purchased by another person 2 years prior to me. When I asked the lawyer about it, he just brushed it off and say People can make all kinda agreements..
But the thing is.. it was a registered agreement...
I learned a lot about deeds, searching, registration and stuff after...
And well trying to take a lawyer to court...yea cant do thatBut he says it was sold/registered two years ago, which means the attorney would have known if a search was done, providing it was registered as stated above.rspann wrote:Can't really blame the lawyer. If when he did the search and it was clear he made the agreement and then the owner went and did other transactions (by other lawyers as you said) there was nothing he could have done. It's plain fraud on the owners part if these transactions were done during the time the deed was being registered . If you were the first one to pay and you completed the transaction before the others, then yours would have been the only valid transaction. The others would have to take him to court for redress.
I bought a property in the west and the owner did the same thing ,sold( well really took downpayments) about ten other people. My deed was registered and the others were left empty handed. He went to Barbados and lived until he died a few years ago, and nobody ever got back their money.
It possible the attorney took his money and never did the search and went ahead to prepare the deed.
And it also goes to show the kinda ppl it have out there...selling land to more than 1 person.
The seller is definitley most at fault as he would have done this intentionally to rob 2 parties of their money.
Somebody should deal with he @$$.
lol that real slight
when i was working EMBD we had numerous complaints of men selling the same piece of land 10-15 times, land that they didnt even own
that timing (and still probably) no one was getting deed for their land, so people were selling it with an agreement that when the deed was actually available, it would go straight to the buyers name
there was never any proper boundaries either
so the scheme behind it was, you just drive and show the potential buyer a piece of land, tell him its yours, sign an agreement saying that when the deed come through it will go straight on his name and repeat x10 or x15
it had a pundit down princes town who team up with a lawyer from same area and was REAL running racket with that
them fawkers was buying men 2 acre agricultural land (not worth much) and making them unknowingly sign for their 1 lot house lots (worth a good bit)
Execute them via stoning or hanging yes...to rob a man he money eh easypugboy wrote:them sellers smart
they know there is demand for land and given the deed issues
with conversion and subdividing of agricultural land etc
they will take advantage of the opportunity to do that nonsense
there should be a law for a person trying to sell a deed more than once
pugboy wrote:there should be a law for a person trying to sell a deed more than once
nos_specialist wrote:2. I am using Extra Concrete from trucks that would of been dumped..and that save some money.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: [X]~Outlaw, shake d livin wake d dead and 124 guests