Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
adnj wrote:Look at the issue in its entirety. Collisions and fatalities occur in developing nations at a higher rate. The most effective way to reduce those effects is to simply lower the speed limit.
This excerpt is worth noting:
An increase in average speed is directly related both to the likelihood of a crash occurring and to the severity of the consequences of the crash. For example, an increase of 1 km/h in mean vehicle speed results in an increase of 3% in the incidence of crashes resulting in injury and an increase of 4–5% in the incidence of fatal crashes. An adult pedestrian’s risk of dying is less than 20% if struck by a car at 50 km/h and almost 60% if hit at 80 km/h.
=====================
Road traffic injuries
Fact sheet
Updated May 2017
Key facts
About 1.25 million people die each year as a result of road traffic crashes. Road traffic injuries are the leading cause of death among people aged between 15 and 29 years. 90% of the world's fatalities on the roads occur in low- and middle-income countries, even though these countries have approximately 54% of the world's vehicles.Nearly half of those dying on the world’s roads are “vulnerable road users”: pedestrians, cyclists, and motorcyclists.Road traffic crashes cost most countries 3% of their gross domestic product.Without sustained action, road traffic crashes are predicted to become the seventh leading cause of death by 2030. The newly adopted 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development has set an ambitious target of halving the global number of deaths and injuries from road traffic crashes by 2020.
Every year the lives of approximately 1.25 million people are cut short as a result of a road traffic crash. Between 20 and 50 million more people suffer non-fatal injuries, with many incurring a disability as a result of their injury.
Road traffic injuries cause considerable economic losses to individuals, their families, and to nations as a whole. These losses arise from the cost of treatment as well as lost productivity for those killed or disabled by their injuries, and for family members who need to take time off work or school to care for the injured. Road traffic crashes cost most countries 3% of their gross domestic product.
Who is at risk?
Socioeconomic status
More than 90% of road traffic deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries. Road traffic injury death rates are highest in the African region. Even within high-income countries, people from lower socioeconomic backgrounds are more likely to be involved in road traffic crashes.
Age
People aged between 15 and 44 years account for 48% of global road traffic deaths.
Sex
From a young age, males are more likely to be involved in road traffic crashes than females. About three quarters (73%) of all road traffic deaths occur among young males under the age of 25 years who are almost 3 times as likely to be killed in a road traffic crash as young females.
Risk factors
The Safe System approach: accommodating human error
The Safe System approach to road safety aims to ensure a safe transport system for all road users. Such an approach takes into account people’s vulnerability to serious injuries in road traffic crashes and recognizes that the system should be designed to be forgiving of human error. The cornerstones of this approach are safe roads and roadsides, safe speeds, safe vehicles, and safe road users, all of which must be addressed in order to eliminate fatal crashes and reduce serious injuries.
Speeding
An increase in average speed is directly related both to the likelihood of a crash occurring and to the severity of the consequences of the crash. For example, an increase of 1 km/h in mean vehicle speed results in an increase of 3% in the incidence of crashes resulting in injury and an increase of 4–5% in the incidence of fatal crashes. An adult pedestrian’s risk of dying is less than 20% if struck by a car at 50 km/h and almost 60% if hit at 80 km/h.Driving under the influence of alcohol and other psychoactive substancesDriving under the influence of alcohol and any psychoactive substance or drug increases the risk of a crash that results in death or serious injuries.In the case of drink-driving, the risk of a road traffic crash starts at low levels of blood alcohol concentration (BAC) and increases significantly when the driver's BAC is ≥ 0.04 g/dl.In the case of drug-driving, the risk of incurring a road traffic crash is increased to differing degrees depending on the psychoactive drug used. For example, the risk of a fatal crash occurring among those who have used amphetamines is about 5 times the risk of someone who hasn't.Nonuse of motorcycle helmets, seat-belts, and child restraintsWearing a motorcycle helmet correctly can reduce the risk of death by almost 40% and the risk of severe injury by over 70%.Wearing a seat-belt reduces the risk of a fatality among front-seat passengers by 40–50% and of rear-seat passengers by between 25–75%.If correctly installed and used, child restraints reduce deaths among infants by approximately 70% and deaths among small children by between 54% and 80%.Distracted driving
There are many types of distractions that can lead to impaired driving. The distraction caused by mobile phones is a growing concern for road safety.
Drivers using mobile phones are approximately 4 times more likely to be involved in a crash than drivers not using a mobile phone. Using a phone while driving slows reaction times (notably braking reaction time, but also reaction to traffic signals), and makes it difficult to keep in the correct lane, and to keep the correct following distances.Hands-free phones are not much safer than hand-held phone sets, and texting considerably increases the risk of a crash.Unsafe road infrastructure
The design of roads can have a considerable impact on their safety. Ideally, roads should be designed keeping in mind the safety of all road users. This would mean making sure that there are adequate facilities for pedestrians, cyclists, and motorcyclists. Measures such as footpaths, cycling lanes, safe crossing points, and other traffic calming measures can be critical to reducing the risk of injury among these road users.
Unsafe vehicles
Safe vehicles play a critical role in averting crashes and reducing the likelihood of serious injury. There are a number of UN regulations on vehicle safety that, if applied to countries’ manufacturing and production standards, would potentially save many lives. These include requiring vehicle manufacturers to meet front and side impact regulations, to include electronic stability control (to prevent over-steering) and to ensure airbags and seat-belts are fitted in all vehicles. Without these basic standards the risk of traffic injuries – both to those in the vehicle and those out of it – is considerably increased.
Inadequate post-crash care
Delays in detecting and providing care for those involved in a road traffic crash increase the severity of injuries. Care of injuries after a crash has occurred is extremely time-sensitive: delays of minutes can make the difference between life and death.
Inadequate law enforcement of traffic laws
If traffic laws on drink-driving, seat-belt wearing, speed limits, helmets, and child restraints are not enforced, they cannot bring about the expected reduction in road traffic fatalities and injuries related to specific behaviours. Thus, if traffic laws are not enforced or are perceived as not being enforced it is likely they will not be complied with and therefore will have very little chance of influencing behaviour.
Effective enforcement includes establishing, regularly updating, and enforcing laws at the national, municipal, and local levels that address the above mentioned risk factors. It includes also the definition of appropriate penalties.drchaos wrote:adnj wrote:drchaos wrote:
Speeding is hardly even a factor in causing RTA. The bulk of accidents are caused by distracted and undisciplined drivers.
Cracking down on the real cause of accidents would actually put a bigger dent in the "innocent" road casualties.
You are wrong. Speeding is a key risk factor in traffic accidents and fatalities. It has been tied to global lowered life expectancy by the World Health Organization.
Use and the ability to understand the English language is very important here.
If you do not understand the fundamental difference between a risk factor vs a causative factor. Then I am truly concerned
drchaos wrote:redmanjp wrote:drchaos wrote:redmanjp wrote:drchaos wrote:Ben_spanna wrote:Just fed up of seeing so many innocent people getting killed as a direct result of idiots speeding and losing control or not taking into consideration that they cannot stop in time.
Speeding is not the only reason for people losing their lives on the roadways I know, but its one of the factors that contribute that we can try to control.
Speeding is hardly even a factor in causing RTA. The bulk of accidents are caused by distracted and undisciplined drivers.
Cracking down on the real cause of accidents would actually put a bigger dent in the "innocent" road casualties.
Instead they cracking down on speeding as a money making venture and chaining you up into thinking they trying to prevent road carnage. They really don't care about road deaths ... they concerned with balancing their budget.
it IS a factor- especially 100km in excess of the limit. yes there are other factors. but even if u distracted- being distracted at 80km could still allow u to have time to stop/take control of a situation, whereas at 180 u doh have time to do so- how much more 10s of metres every second u travelling? even if u hit at 80 the impact not going to be nearly as damaging as 180. u could break traffic laws but not d laws of physics.
btw accidents have reduced since they introduced the speed guns
The reductions in road deaths have been less than 10% .... somewhere around 7% which could be attributed to other factors as well. So not statistically significant.
So what you saying is the speed limit should be under 180 km/h? Like 170 KM/h cause that is less than 100 km over the speed limit. I like your thinking Friend!
where I said 170 is safe? all i meant was 180 is much more dangerous than 80.
check out the stats from Arrive Alive:DATE 30th March 17
YEAR 2016 2017
# FATAL RTA’S 33 16 52% Decrease
# OF DEATHS 39 18 54% Decrease
According to TTPS the number is 11% reduction .... Like allu fellars forget to read and comprehend. 7-10% is somewhere around 11%.
http://www.trinidadexpress.com/20170111 ... -accidents
Arrive alive continues to lie, they initially lied about speed being the cause of around 60% of RTA in T&T.
adnj wrote:You are wrong again (and remember that we are discussing statistics and not language).
Let's pick apart the original post:
"Speeding is hardly even a factor. " REALLY wrong on this one. Also remember that speeding is going above the mean speed or faster than equipment or conditions indicate as safe. Not the same as "going fast".
The cause of most road traffic accidents is driver error. You say that drivers are distracted and undisciplined - that is simply not a cause. By definition, causality requires an event.
Decreased speed is the most effective method of reducing all traffic fatalities. Not cracking down - whatever you meant by that.
It seems as if you are trying to argue that human error is the cause and can be eliminated. It cannot.
I would like to see the speed limit raised, too. Vehicle safety was a professional concern of mine and I believe that popular opinion is sometimes just not aligned with the facts. But it seems like you're just talking out loud and want to prove that you're pissed off. Okay, I get that and I apologize if I have said something in this thread in such a way that implies that you are less intelligent or less interesting or whatever. If you want to further discuss any of these points, feel free to pm. I promise that I will respond politely.
redmanjp wrote:drchaos wrote:redmanjp wrote:drchaos wrote:redmanjp wrote:drchaos wrote:Ben_spanna wrote:Just fed up of seeing so many innocent people getting killed as a direct result of idiots speeding and losing control or not taking into consideration that they cannot stop in time.
Speeding is not the only reason for people losing their lives on the roadways I know, but its one of the factors that contribute that we can try to control.
Speeding is hardly even a factor in causing RTA. The bulk of accidents are caused by distracted and undisciplined drivers.
Cracking down on the real cause of accidents would actually put a bigger dent in the "innocent" road casualties.
Instead they cracking down on speeding as a money making venture and chaining you up into thinking they trying to prevent road carnage. They really don't care about road deaths ... they concerned with balancing their budget.
it IS a factor- especially 100km in excess of the limit. yes there are other factors. but even if u distracted- being distracted at 80km could still allow u to have time to stop/take control of a situation, whereas at 180 u doh have time to do so- how much more 10s of metres every second u travelling? even if u hit at 80 the impact not going to be nearly as damaging as 180. u could break traffic laws but not d laws of physics.
btw accidents have reduced since they introduced the speed guns
The reductions in road deaths have been less than 10% .... somewhere around 7% which could be attributed to other factors as well. So not statistically significant.
So what you saying is the speed limit should be under 180 km/h? Like 170 KM/h cause that is less than 100 km over the speed limit. I like your thinking Friend!
where I said 170 is safe? all i meant was 180 is much more dangerous than 80.
check out the stats from Arrive Alive:DATE 30th March 17
YEAR 2016 2017
# FATAL RTA’S 33 16 52% Decrease
# OF DEATHS 39 18 54% Decrease
According to TTPS the number is 11% reduction .... Like allu fellars forget to read and comprehend. 7-10% is somewhere around 11%.
http://www.trinidadexpress.com/20170111 ... -accidents
Arrive alive continues to lie, they initially lied about speed being the cause of around 60% of RTA in T&T.
that stat is comparing 2015 to 2016. speed guns were introduced May 2016 almost halfway through the year so it will not fully reflect the effect of introducing the speed guns- no enforcement before may 2016 would have skewed the stats. my stat compared 1st 3 months of 2016 before the speed guns to 1st 3 months after they were introduced.
mad wrote:Speeding does not cause accidents. It will however determine the severity of the damage and thus injuries, if any.
95% of accidents are caused by human behavior and disregard of simple defensive driving tactics. The other 5% is the freak accidents.
Let me give three common examples, and is entirely human behavior:
1) Driving on the SH highway, I am on the left lane doing about ah 90. I am behind a lady in a corolla doing about same speed like me. On the rear view mirror saw a benz bolting coming on the right lane. Ms lady eh even bother to watch and just pull on the right lane. Man in d benz hadda mash brakes like crazy. I pull on the shoulder to give him room.
2) Gulf City Traffic Light, going across to KFC. I behind a taxi man in a crown. Waiting for the light to turn green. Eventually turned green, man in the taxi eh bother to watch both sides even though he get green. 3 ton truck nearly clear him away.
3) Rain now start to fall, road wet and slippery and men speeding.
This is just a few of the many examples of how people in general drives in Trinidad. People now only think about themselves and lack simple defensive driving tactics. People have to learn to drive for themselves and for others. When that happens the accidents will stop.
drchaos wrote:mad wrote:Speeding does not cause accidents. It will however determine the severity of the damage and thus injuries, if any.
95% of accidents are caused by human behavior and disregard of simple defensive driving tactics. The other 5% is the freak accidents.
Let me give three common examples, and is entirely human behavior:
1) Driving on the SH highway, I am on the left lane doing about ah 90. I am behind a lady in a corolla doing about same speed like me. On the rear view mirror saw a benz bolting coming on the right lane. Ms lady eh even bother to watch and just pull on the right lane. Man in d benz hadda mash brakes like crazy. I pull on the shoulder to give him room.
2) Gulf City Traffic Light, going across to KFC. I behind a taxi man in a crown. Waiting for the light to turn green. Eventually turned green, man in the taxi eh bother to watch both sides even though he get green. 3 ton truck nearly clear him away.
3) Rain now start to fall, road wet and slippery and men speeding.
This is just a few of the many examples of how people in general drives in Trinidad. People now only think about themselves and lack simple defensive driving tactics. People have to learn to drive for themselves and for others. When that happens the accidents will stop.
Dude stop talking so much sense ... They will tell you you wrong then blurt out some off topic crap like risk factors.
desifemlove wrote:who the firetruck are these groups who call for these speed limits? what's their road qualifications? are they trained in road safety? or they just look on google to see what the US or UK or Germany do, and think we can do it too? tell me which US freeway or UK motorway has big potholes? not many. UK motorways have fully noted roadworks, does Trini? they even place ads in papers for this, Trini don't. germany has no speed limits, but then would there be smoke from fires in fields going on the road? no.
Increasing the speed limit is a disaster in the making, and they can cite these dopey points of "but cars have improved!" they have, but then it not that simple.
desifemlove wrote:who the firetruck are these groups who call for these speed limits? what's their road qualifications? are they trained in road safety? or they just look on google to see what the US or UK or Germany do, and think we can do it too? tell me which US freeway or UK motorway has big potholes? not many. UK motorways have fully noted roadworks, does Trini? they even place ads in papers for this, Trini don't. germany has no speed limits, but then would there be smoke from fires in fields going on the road? no.
Increasing the speed limit is a disaster in the making, and they can cite these dopey points of "but cars have improved!" they have, but then it not that simple.
Monkey Man wrote:dan wais all d beet up about. it not that hard to get away from speed gun.
i never change my driving style since the gun dem come out. and i never get ketch. no petty law like that will even matter to me. they can rise the limit to 140 i still wouldnt stick to that.
once i have some money in the bank i jiving normelll
adnj wrote:SINCE the use of speed guns began in May 2016, police officers have issued no less than 11,294 tickets. This year alone, 7,445 tickets have been issued which amounts to $7,445,000 that will go to the Treasury.
The information was disclosed in a statement issued by the police on Wednesday.
http://www.trinidadexpress.com/20170517/news/11294-drivers-ticketed-for-speeding
adnj wrote:desifemlove wrote:who the firetruck are these groups who call for these speed limits? what's their road qualifications? are they trained in road safety? or they just look on google to see what the US or UK or Germany do, and think we can do it too? tell me which US freeway or UK motorway has big potholes? not many. UK motorways have fully noted roadworks, does Trini? they even place ads in papers for this, Trini don't. germany has no speed limits, but then would there be smoke from fires in fields going on the road? no.
Increasing the speed limit is a disaster in the making, and they can cite these dopey points of "but cars have improved!" they have, but then it not that simple.
German roads do have a speed limit. The Bundesautobahnen has no speed limits in most places but not all.
There are many roads in the US that have been identified as in "poor conditon".
"America’s roads are often crowded, frequently in poor condition, chronically underfunded, and are becoming more dangerous. More than two out of every five miles of America’s urban interstates are congested and traffic delays cost the country $160 billion in wasted time and fuel in 2014. One out of every five miles of highway pavement is in poor condition and our roads have a significant and increasing backlog of rehabilitation needs. After years of decline, traffic fatalities increased by 7% from 2014 to 2015, with 35,092 people dying on America’s roads."
vct17inch wrote:Questions on the fixed speeding cameras:
1- Two cars driving past the camera. One driving at 50kph. And the car beind which is travelling at 110kph. Let's say the one travelling at 110kph triggers the camera at the same moment when he meets the person driving at 50kph so they are both in the image right next to each other. Can it identify correctly the speeding vehicle?
2- If the camera is set to trigger at 80kph then what about the 65kph speed limit for heavy-t vehicles?
TriP wrote:So the list of fixed cameras/ speed trap locations are:
Northbound -
1) Corinth flyover
2) Gasparillo flyover
3) Munroe Road flyover
4) Caroni flyover
5) Grand Bazaar
Southbound -
1) Grand Bazaar
2) Caroni Flyover
3) Munroe Road Flyover
4) Seereeram Brothers
5) After Sando Tech turnoff/ before Gasparillo
6) Golconda Flyover
7) Just after Penal Flyover
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: alfa, Kritical01, ttphilip and 188 guests