Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Woes on Sister Isle Sisters speak up for Tobago
THE grim newspaper headlines about Tobago don’t begin to describe the extent to which many Tobagonians are suffering. To understand how the collapse of the sea bridge and the resulting economic woes are affecting Tobagonians, one would have to look to proprietors of guesthouses and hotels who’ve seen their profits dwindle; business people who’ve had to close up shop; workers in the hotel and tourism sectors who’ve been sent home; and healthcare providers who have lost their jobs and have had to leave Tobago with their families in tow to find employment in Trinidad’s public health system.
One would need to speak with the average man on the street, including many unemployed single mothers who have been served with eviction notices for defaulting on their rent payments...
I love how fan boys from both political parties suddenly get 20/20 vision and foresight when their respective political party is in opposition. Cause Clearly their political leader never BS the population at anytime whatsoever.shake d livin wake d dead wrote:Shitkickers have sheit in he eye
boxy wrote:I love how fan boys from both political parties suddenly get 20/20 vision and foresight when their respective political party is in opposition. Cause Clearly their political leader never BS the population at anytime whatsoever.shake d livin wake d dead wrote:Shitkickers have sheit in he eye
why would I prove u wrong they are currently doing sheit as well but not as much if u remember clearly EVERY WEEK it was a bachannal that outshine the previous one. kinda like how Trump have his country media dazed. but this ferry fiasco is being made political for traction by the opposition and their bloggers/supporters.shake d livin wake d dead wrote:boxy wrote:I love how fan boys from both political parties suddenly get 20/20 vision and foresight when their respective political party is in opposition. Cause Clearly their political leader never BS the population at anytime whatsoever.shake d livin wake d dead wrote:Shitkickers have sheit in he eye
Easy...when kams had she time...they did the nonsense...not defending it...when Uml used to say what they did for toco/grande I totally disagree...because unc a do one mc for grande...hence the reason I will maintain I have not voted or will never vote...that being said...unc did nonsense
Face the facts...shitkickers et al worse...prove me wrong nah...post something in the achievement ched
boxy wrote:why would I prove u wrong they are currently doing sheit as well but not as much if u remember clearly EVERY WEEK it was a bachannal that outshine the previous one. kinda like how Trump have his country media dazed. but this ferry fiasco is being made political for traction by the opposition and their bloggers/supporters.shake d livin wake d dead wrote:boxy wrote:I love how fan boys from both political parties suddenly get 20/20 vision and foresight when their respective political party is in opposition. Cause Clearly their political leader never BS the population at anytime whatsoever.shake d livin wake d dead wrote:Shitkickers have sheit in he eye
Easy...when kams had she time...they did the nonsense...not defending it...when Uml used to say what they did for toco/grande I totally disagree...because unc a do one mc for grande...hence the reason I will maintain I have not voted or will never vote...that being said...unc did nonsense
Face the facts...shitkickers et al worse...prove me wrong nah...post something in the achievement ched
When CAL planes were having issues a year or two ago nobody said anything about government or line minister why? because people were more concerned with safety and no ending up with any accidents in the air. Same should be done about the seabridge this is too much of a coincidence.
And I can actually think of one achievement if u want to call it that. Telling the IMF to go wine on a pineapple. Notice they havnt poked their nose in the country affairs since they last said to remove all subsidies and Sheitkicker declined. well except for gas. Man everytime I her gas subsidy I remember that smug look on that fools face when he say the country in riot yet. he is Such a complete tool.
I want to believe that was a trick/troll question but if it's not the fact that u could ask something like that simply means u get your news current affairs and other important news from Facebook and tuner. #continuetostaywokemahbrotherDaran wrote:boxy wrote:why would I prove u wrong they are currently doing sheit as well but not as much if u remember clearly EVERY WEEK it was a bachannal that outshine the previous one. kinda like how Trump have his country media dazed. but this ferry fiasco is being made political for traction by the opposition and their bloggers/supporters.shake d livin wake d dead wrote:boxy wrote:I love how fan boys from both political parties suddenly get 20/20 vision and foresight when their respective political party is in opposition. Cause Clearly their political leader never BS the population at anytime whatsoever.shake d livin wake d dead wrote:Shitkickers have sheit in he eye
Easy...when kams had she time...they did the nonsense...not defending it...when Uml used to say what they did for toco/grande I totally disagree...because unc a do one mc for grande...hence the reason I will maintain I have not voted or will never vote...that being said...unc did nonsense
Face the facts...shitkickers et al worse...prove me wrong nah...post something in the achievement ched
When CAL planes were having issues a year or two ago nobody said anything about government or line minister why? because people were more concerned with safety and no ending up with any accidents in the air. Same should be done about the seabridge this is too much of a coincidence.
And I can actually think of one achievement if u want to call it that. Telling the IMF to go wine on a pineapple. Notice they havnt poked their nose in the country affairs since they last said to remove all subsidies and Sheitkicker declined. well except for gas. Man everytime I her gas subsidy I remember that smug look on that fools face when he say the country in riot yet. he is Such a complete tool.
How that achievement benefit we?
yeah that won't change if u notice Watson Duke has the same boisterous and stubborn attitude same as with Ashworth Jack seems common with Tobagonians. Hell even Robinson even though soft spoken with a bullet in he leg and a gun to his head tell the regiment Attack with full force. I find it unbecoming especially in his press conferences.shake d livin wake d dead wrote:Apart from doing sheit...shitkickers need to learn how to speak to ppl...that ole ni$$a attitude is very embarassing
it's pretty interesting how that word keeps getting used as a scapegoat though. didn't they say some douche stuff the toilets in Brian Lara stadium with cloth the first day it was used?sMASH wrote:sabotage me once, shame on you.
sabotage me twice, shame on you.
sabotage me three times, shame on you.
sabotage me again, shame on you.
sabotage me 5 years straight, PNM 2015-2020
agreed. but I remember there being more to it than the 5 year contract there was alot of unscrupulous tactics used by the local shipping agents acting on behalf of the galacia.hydroep wrote:...reading this morning that CAL is to pay LIAT US$ 800,000 for services to supplement the Sea Bridge:
http://newsday.co.tt/2018/04/07/5m-for-liat-flights-to-tobago/
Serious question: In light of the continually mounting costs associated with this fiasco (wet leases to additional Air Carriers, payments for the "cargo barge" and other short term arrangements, wear and tear on the Water Taxis, loss of business to truckers, hoteliers and other small businesses, long term damage to the Tobago brand etc...etc...etc...) wouldn't it have made sense for the Prime Minister to swallow his pride and accept the supposed 5-year contract offered for the retention of the Super Fast Galicia
the agent was pushing for a multi year contract or nothing at all. So in essence they were on a short term contract indefinitely while the tenders were going out for a new provider. Also the galacia had cargo carrying facilities but the port did not have infrastructure to have the galacia utilize that feature. I remember they would have had to spent a few million to dredge near the Hyatt just for the galacia. which made no sense. Unless the new ferry requires the same thing in which case we back to square one and the board should resign with immediate effect...wait isn't there a new board after that whole thing occurred.. damn this is a sheit pretzelsMASH wrote:They SAID it had stuff had gone on in the procurement practise, and the ferry service didn't have a stellar performance. So, no problem if they wanted to weed out corruption... To right ahead, get evidence of the wrong doings and prosecute accordingly.
But all the credibility of righting the wrongs to have fidelity in the service went out the window when it was made public that the galacia people was bidding, winning, then having the criteria changed and having to resubmit.
I can understand the desire for a 5 year contract, in order to lock in a definite earnings for an asset.
Even self if they wanted a new service provider, they could have just retained the galacia for a year again while they get the next provider on line. Instead of demonstrating their management capabilities
Boxy, ah know you tryin to justify this present shiet by nit picking the past shiet eh bro.....but we in real sheit now!!!boxy wrote:the agent was pushing for a multi year contract or nothing at all. So in essence they were on a short term contract indefinitely while the tenders were going out for a new provider. Also the galacia had cargo carrying facilities but the port did not have infrastructure to have the galacia utilize that feature. I remember they would have had to spent a few million to dredge near the Hyatt just for the galacia. which made no sense. Unless the new ferry requires the same thing in which case we back to square one and the board should resign with immediate effect...wait isn't there a new board after that whole thing occurred.. damn this is a sheit pretzelsMASH wrote:They SAID it had stuff had gone on in the procurement practise, and the ferry service didn't have a stellar performance. So, no problem if they wanted to weed out corruption... To right ahead, get evidence of the wrong doings and prosecute accordingly.
But all the credibility of righting the wrongs to have fidelity in the service went out the window when it was made public that the galacia people was bidding, winning, then having the criteria changed and having to resubmit.
I can understand the desire for a 5 year contract, in order to lock in a definite earnings for an asset.
Even self if they wanted a new service provider, they could have just retained the galacia for a year again while they get the next provider on line. Instead of demonstrating their management capabilities
u seriously saw me nit picking? or clearly stating how we got to this point? why every discussion has to lead to then person who u don't agree with hadda be a PNM UNC or COP? it's such a desperate go to move. what did I say that was biased? I literally agreed that things may have been better if the galacia stayed what more yuh want? oh right leave out the facts so your ego is insatiably stroked? f**k outta here with that.rebound wrote:Boxy, ah know you tryin to justify this present shiet by nit picking the past shiet eh bro.....but we in real sheit now!!!boxy wrote:the agent was pushing for a multi year contract or nothing at all. So in essence they were on a short term contract indefinitely while the tenders were going out for a new provider. Also the galacia had cargo carrying facilities but the port did not have infrastructure to have the galacia utilize that feature. I remember they would have had to spent a few million to dredge near the Hyatt just for the galacia. which made no sense. Unless the new ferry requires the same thing in which case we back to square one and the board should resign with immediate effect...wait isn't there a new board after that whole thing occurred.. damn this is a sheit pretzelsMASH wrote:They SAID it had stuff had gone on in the procurement practise, and the ferry service didn't have a stellar performance. So, no problem if they wanted to weed out corruption... To right ahead, get evidence of the wrong doings and prosecute accordingly.
But all the credibility of righting the wrongs to have fidelity in the service went out the window when it was made public that the galacia people was bidding, winning, then having the criteria changed and having to resubmit.
I can understand the desire for a 5 year contract, in order to lock in a definite earnings for an asset.
Even self if they wanted a new service provider, they could have just retained the galacia for a year again while they get the next provider on line. Instead of demonstrating their management capabilities
Wow...ok then..boxy wrote:u seriously saw me nit picking? or clearly stating how we got to this point? why every discussion has to lead to then person who u don't agree with hadda be a PNM UNC or COP? it's such a desperate go to move. what did I say that was biased? I literally agreed that things may have been better if the galacia stayed what more yuh want? oh right leave out the facts so your ego is insatiably stroked? f**k outta here with that.rebound wrote:Boxy, ah know you tryin to justify this present shiet by nit picking the past shiet eh bro.....but we in real sheit now!!!boxy wrote:the agent was pushing for a multi year contract or nothing at all. So in essence they were on a short term contract indefinitely while the tenders were going out for a new provider. Also the galacia had cargo carrying facilities but the port did not have infrastructure to have the galacia utilize that feature. I remember they would have had to spent a few million to dredge near the Hyatt just for the galacia. which made no sense. Unless the new ferry requires the same thing in which case we back to square one and the board should resign with immediate effect...wait isn't there a new board after that whole thing occurred.. damn this is a sheit pretzelsMASH wrote:They SAID it had stuff had gone on in the procurement practise, and the ferry service didn't have a stellar performance. So, no problem if they wanted to weed out corruption... To right ahead, get evidence of the wrong doings and prosecute accordingly.
But all the credibility of righting the wrongs to have fidelity in the service went out the window when it was made public that the galacia people was bidding, winning, then having the criteria changed and having to resubmit.
I can understand the desire for a 5 year contract, in order to lock in a definite earnings for an asset.
Even self if they wanted a new service provider, they could have just retained the galacia for a year again while they get the next provider on line. Instead of demonstrating their management capabilities
my apologies bro I just realised I reacted like De Dragon and Desi. I however take offense to u not seeing that I brought out both sides of the argument . Claiming I nit picking is deceptive at best. again sorry for reacting like a dickrebound wrote:Wow...ok then..boxy wrote:u seriously saw me nit picking? or clearly stating how we got to this point? why every discussion has to lead to then person who u don't agree with hadda be a PNM UNC or COP? it's such a desperate go to move. what did I say that was biased? I literally agreed that things may have been better if the galacia stayed what more yuh want? oh right leave out the facts so your ego is insatiably stroked? f**k outta here with that.rebound wrote:Boxy, ah know you tryin to justify this present shiet by nit picking the past shiet eh bro.....but we in real sheit now!!!boxy wrote:the agent was pushing for a multi year contract or nothing at all. So in essence they were on a short term contract indefinitely while the tenders were going out for a new provider. Also the galacia had cargo carrying facilities but the port did not have infrastructure to have the galacia utilize that feature. I remember they would have had to spent a few million to dredge near the Hyatt just for the galacia. which made no sense. Unless the new ferry requires the same thing in which case we back to square one and the board should resign with immediate effect...wait isn't there a new board after that whole thing occurred.. damn this is a sheit pretzelsMASH wrote:They SAID it had stuff had gone on in the procurement practise, and the ferry service didn't have a stellar performance. So, no problem if they wanted to weed out corruption... To right ahead, get evidence of the wrong doings and prosecute accordingly.
But all the credibility of righting the wrongs to have fidelity in the service went out the window when it was made public that the galacia people was bidding, winning, then having the criteria changed and having to resubmit.
I can understand the desire for a 5 year contract, in order to lock in a definite earnings for an asset.
Even self if they wanted a new service provider, they could have just retained the galacia for a year again while they get the next provider on line. Instead of demonstrating their management capabilities
sMASH wrote:They SAID it had stuff had gone on in the procurement practise, and the ferry service didn't have a stellar performance. So, no problem if they wanted to weed out corruption... To right ahead, get evidence of the wrong doings and prosecute accordingly.
But all the credibility of righting the wrongs to have fidelity in the service went out the window when it was made public that the galacia people was bidding, winning, then having the criteria changed and having to resubmit.
I can understand the desire for a 5 year contract, in order to lock in a definite earnings for an asset.
Even self if they wanted a new service provider, they could have just retained the galacia for a year again while they get the next provider on line. Instead of demonstrating their management capabilities
matr1x wrote:If you hear the callers on i95.5 yesterday. Pnm till dey dead. And honestly, what value they bring to the republic?
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: daring dragoon, Google [Bot] and 79 guests