Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
maj. tom wrote:Both should resign.
matr1x wrote:Both were bad....but Rowley determined to be worse
matr1x wrote:Nahhh...they prove you can fit an obese heffer through a door. ...twice! That is a performance!
10-01 wrote:matr1x wrote:Nahhh...they prove you can fit an obese heffer through a door. ...twice! That is a performance!
pics ?
matr1x wrote:10-01 wrote:matr1x wrote:Nahhh...they prove you can fit an obese heffer through a door. ...twice! That is a performance!
pics ?
Most pics of Marlene are composites. Nasa working on a 2 million megapixl camera to capture her all at once.
hydroep wrote:Both started off with a lot of goodwill but it all went downhill after that. Right now Dr. Rowley appears to be less popular than KPB was 2+ years into her tenure probably because he came into power riding a wave of anti-corruption rhetoric but seems to be casually dismissive of comparable goings on under his administration. Given the harsh economic realities facing citizens that's a little hard to take.
That he appears to be living it up (rubbing up he bamsie in a Benz, always playing golf/on vacation etc.) while remaining indifferent to the plight of the middle and lower classes undoubtedly contributes his unpopularity as well.
As for elections, the snakes in the balisier would probably still win if called tomorrow because of the electoral distribution of their grassroots support. There's absolutely nothing on offer by the opposition to entice a sufficient amount of swing voters to upset the status quo.
The_Honourable wrote:
Kamla really has no moral authority to criticize the BS rowley is doing since the same was going on under her tenure but people are wondering who is the better evil.
10-01 wrote:
performance at its best ...
this is the only government i have seen get so muc FB memes in 2 years
nismoid wrote:Allyuh believe Rowley is Prime Minister?
Redress10 wrote:Kamla never managed nothing. She allowed herself to be nothing more than a "distracting" bubblehead. She literally managed nothing and tried to bamboozle us with nothing more than PR.
Had she actually tried to run the country, I would have given her a second chance. She can go to hell for all I care. Rowley too old...Personally I don't think that prime ministers/leaders today should be more than 55 years old upon gaining office. What you really going to bring to the table by being a Prime Minister for the first time at 60+?
60+ is when people does retired from professional life. Dafuq.
Sad to say our problem is not a leadership deficit. We have "leaders". What we seriously lack is creation and innovation. Our biggest failure is carnival. We honestly believe that is some sort of innovation and creativity.
A society that is determined to promote the lie that bikini and beads is creation and innovation would always fail. Had we truly understood life and innovation etc then mas/carnival would be nothing more than a seasonal distraction and not a year round fusion of our dna.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: pugboy and 208 guests