Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Redman you fill ah chit.Redman wrote:Rambarran discloses and identifies specific information on users of forex.
He is fired.
What is the persecution there?
When a reference is requested from a former employee...I say what I know.
JR did crap as head of the CBTT in the disclosure....he refused to meet with the Min of Finance despite being called to meet after the disclosure.
and he does not want that to influence his next job.
If the Minister of Finance spoke the truth then it isnt persecution-its the reasons he was fired.
rspann wrote:The difference is ,when pnm ministers do crap or crime, they are not fired and when they are fired they are re-hired. A la Marlene , Lester , Dillon ,Darryl and the list goes on
Trinis are not going to demand chit.88sins wrote:I doh unnastan y allyuh beatin up so much for.
impinbutt eh want ppl kno he stink and badmind and malicious and does do real kaka on purpose. when yuh get ketch in folly d last thing yuh want is for that folly to be exposed and documented and broadcast for the world to see. it only natural to want to avoid embarrassment.
What I want to kno is when we as a ppl going to start demanding and making sure that these flatulent sphincters some of us call a govt pay for their follies out of their own pockets and suffer the consequences of their actions at their own personal expense. Ppl fed up of their tax dollars having to pay for all kinda nonsense caused by these asses, particularly since there are so many other things those resources could be used for that would be of benefit to the people and the nation on the whole.
because as long as the taxpayer keeps footing the bills for their bs, it eh go stop or even discourage any of them from their habit of thinking and acting like jackasses and making stupid choices that affect every single Trini while they in their positions.
Noting wrong with herbs and hoes, that's every man dream. Two pull showed us the way.88sins wrote:rspann wrote:The difference is ,when pnm ministers do crap or crime, they are not fired and when they are fired they are re-hired. A la Marlene , Lester , Dillon ,Darryl and the list goes on
same can be said for unc,
let's not forget the 2 pull man in a room smoking ganja with hoes, and his life sport debacle, and kamlas constant shuffling of ministers like a old deck of cards.
Whether an employee is fired or not an employer does hamper an ex employee furture employment.
It is not the norm to ever give a bad reference. Same as an employee speaking negative about his former employer.
He was fired cause PNM see him as a UNC. PNM fires all UNC appointments which is the norm to seek their best interest or follows 1% orders. But it is tacky to hamper someone career because of their biases.Redman wrote:Whether an employee is fired or not an employer does hamper an ex employee furture employment.
Well if the truth is that he was a bad employee...it supposed too.It is not the norm to ever give a bad reference. Same as an employee speaking negative about his former employer.
may be in your head....so I fired him cuz he was a model employee.
When those calls come I tell the truth.
Fkin deal with it.
He called names to expose the rape or Forex and 99% of people who did not get vex.Redman wrote:Every government that comes in replaces every position that they can.
Thats the reality.
He was fired because he called names
But ZR you know it was Rambarran that called this recession that you so vehemently and repeatedly deny ?
And again-Any employer that calls for a reference -gets the truth.
Its up to the employee to decide what that truth is.
Imps bert will look like a fool as always after he looses.Redman wrote:Whatever the reason you feel.....its a gross breach to disclose customer identity.
And he was fired.
Being a political appointee he bitching about the same system that got him the job ahead of others....thanks to uncle Winston.
hover11 wrote:If it wasn't for Jwala the public would have never known who using the majority of forex in this country and to what extent. Which deserved to be public knowledge in the first place
Dizzy28 wrote:"State to pay" should never be used. They should always use - Taxpayers to fund
VexXx Dogg wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:"State to pay" should never be used. They should always use - Taxpayers to fund
Litigation is very lucrative.
Lawyers pulling in the paper. It too late to do law?
Ent they just give away 1 billion dollars. They vote for thatLes Bain wrote:"They eh riot yet" is not far off from "Is not my money Jawala getting."
Taxpayers continuing to collect L's with this bunch of career imbeciles.
Les Bain wrote:Might have had more non indians in court if certain people children treated school as a place to beat book instead of meow and each other.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Duane 3NE 2NR and 175 guests