Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
rollingstock wrote:toyota2nr wrote:rollingstock wrote:Google the definition of discretion.
The conditions at the time and other factors would affect discretion not so?
You were there?
No?
Then stfu.
Neither were you there sir so you're just doing like the judges and makes excuses for your fellow officers. The point is the man had tint and was rightfully ticketed however the officer was an idiot for issuing such a high amount of tickets.
Where did I make an excuse for the officer?
In top of being an ass are you also blind and illiterate?
The law states a ticket per each glass, how is the officer wrong for following what is prescribed by law?
You all need to stop playing the victim card and blaming the police for your own idiocy. You all know the tint law is vague and open to an individual officer's view so why take a chance, in fact it's not even taking a chance you want to use 5% all around and also tint the entire front windscreen but blame the police when you get ticketed.
Same as any other offence, no child seat, police have no heart etc.
That's why I will always and will continue treating the public with the utmost respect while shafting them to the hilt as far as the laws allow.
I have that in a vehicle.cost was like 2500 a few years ago. Ronnie who use to be in a tent in front wheel wizard did it for me. Not sure where he is nownervewrecker wrote:Phone Surgeon wrote:i did a 80% full front windscreen with UV protection the other day
wont be lying to say ALL the glare gone and most of the heat that you would usually get from parking in the sun all day is also gone
makes a big big big difference
$450 well worth it
and you really cant notice the whole front windscreen tinted
especially as i put back a dark strip ontop as well
Some vehicles have a set of black dots bordering the black border on the glass. Tint dont sit flat on that. Police know to look for it.
On another note, there was a guy selling bullet proof tint, UV cut bizness. Can anyone remind me who he is? Looking to call down a new ride.
hong kong phooey wrote:WHY cant the simply get a simple candle light meter or lux meter and determine the light intensity difference inside and outside the car .
the law is sheit and they should get the police to go check his eyesight
hong kong phooey wrote:WHY cant the simply get a simple candle light meter or lux meter and determine the light intensity difference inside and outside the car .
the law is sheit and they should get the police to go check his eyesight
hong kong phooey wrote:WHY cant the simply get a simple candle light meter or lux meter and determine the light intensity difference inside and outside the car .
the law is sheit and they should get the police to go check his eyesight
Mercenary wrote:curtains yes
Thats the man self. Real cool dude.Phone Surgeon wrote:I have that in a vehicle.cost was like 2500 a few years ago. Ronnie who use to be in a tent in front wheel wizard did it for me. Not sure where he is nownervewrecker wrote:Phone Surgeon wrote:i did a 80% full front windscreen with UV protection the other day
wont be lying to say ALL the glare gone and most of the heat that you would usually get from parking in the sun all day is also gone
makes a big big big difference
$450 well worth it
and you really cant notice the whole front windscreen tinted
especially as i put back a dark strip ontop as well
Some vehicles have a set of black dots bordering the black border on the glass. Tint dont sit flat on that. Police know to look for it.
On another note, there was a guy selling bullet proof tint, UV cut bizness. Can anyone remind me who he is? Looking to call down a new ride.
Yup that's what I have in my van + 35% ceramic tint. Zero issues with law enforcementMercenary wrote:curtains yes
j.o.e wrote:Trinis just spoil. If Police had a meter to read it they will argue that it not calibrated or some crap. I’m sure 99% of people who get ticketed/ting removes overdid it with the darkness. Men out here crying like they 35% always getting them in problems
So the Transport Commissioner decide to take it upon himself to interpret the law as he sees fit. Of course "any" means each. Last I checked the new fine structure doesn't say each either. This reminds me of when the PoS mayor took it upon himself to charge a higher wrecking fee that what the law stated.rollingstock wrote:According to the Transport Commissioner.
I don't agree with it, but they are the authority on the subject.
Maybe someone will contest it, and let the judiciary have their input via case law, as is it stands.
Soon they might start charging people with black or blue vehicles as regiment uses black sometimes and coast guard uses blue......pete wrote:Does "any" mean each?
hong kong phooey wrote:the next thing is what about people with wagons anr they going to get tickets for those windows because they cannot see inside car trunks without asking the driver to open it
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 276 guests