Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
You and others like you will never understand. Carry on bromero wrote:Zoom accept yuh talking sheit sometimes nahzoom rader wrote:Yes true which is a precursor for Capital punishment. It starts from there.Dizzy28 wrote:That's corporal punishment brahzoom rader wrote:You prefer your kids in school to get a good cut arse from a bully teacher?Dizzy28 wrote:Necks may actually pop!!!
The Privy Council will always be anti capital punishment.
Capital punishment is death penalty by whatever means
express wrote:‘I will sue PM myself’
by anna ramdass
THE case against Chief Justice Ivor Archie is not closed. Senior Counsel Israel Khan said yesterday if the Law Association of Trinidad and Tobago (LATT) takes no action, then he will take the Prime Minister to court over his decision not to invoke Section 137 of the Constitution.
This section of the Constitution would have caused President Paula-Mae Weekes to appoint an independent tribunal to investigate allegations against the Chief Justice. Prime Minister Dr Keith Rowley sought legal advice from British Queen’s Counsel Howard Stevens and from that April 25 opinion, Rowley decided to not take action against Archie.
kstt wrote:(In addition to HDC house and security services)
Homosexuality is against the law.
He is the CJ.
He is breaking the law.
JUSTICE LUCKY, IS IT YOU?
CJ affair on UNC Facebook page
A voice recording purporting to be that of High Court judge Gillian Lucky disclosing that she facilitated requests for Chief Justice Ivor Archie to assist his fraudster friend Kern Romero with money has gone viral.
The recording was posted on social media site Facebook around 9.34 a.m. yesterday, on what is considered an Opposition United National Congress (UNC) page “From Mason Hall to Hell”, under the caption, “Defination (sic) of misbehaviour in public office”. The post, which has composite images of both Archie and Justice Lucky dressed in their court robes, as well as convicted fraudster Dillian Johnson, was shared over 100 times.
zoom rader wrote:You and others like you will never understand. Carry on bromero wrote:Zoom accept yuh talking sheit sometimes nahzoom rader wrote:Yes true which is a precursor for Capital punishment. It starts from there.Dizzy28 wrote:That's corporal punishment brahzoom rader wrote:You prefer your kids in school to get a good cut arse from a bully teacher?Dizzy28 wrote:Necks may actually pop!!!
The Privy Council will always be anti capital punishment.
Capital punishment is death penalty by whatever means
You can't explain these things to mero, he is hard core PNM.Numb3r4 wrote:zoom rader wrote:You and others like you will never understand. Carry on bromero wrote:Zoom accept yuh talking sheit sometimes nahzoom rader wrote:Yes true which is a precursor for Capital punishment. It starts from there.Dizzy28 wrote:That's corporal punishment brahzoom rader wrote:You prefer your kids in school to get a good cut arse from a bully teacher?Dizzy28 wrote:Necks may actually pop!!!
The Privy Council will always be anti capital punishment.
Capital punishment is death penalty by whatever means
Corporal punishment uses physical means of punishing the person, thus inflicting physical harm.
Capital punishment results in the death of the person.
Thus by those 2 definitions we can see the capital punishment is a sub-set of corporal punishment, albeit an extreme one. Capital could be considered a drastic form of Corporal.
If you think it doesn't make sense then consider the naming of the forms of punishment after the rank or chain of command of a military or uniformed (fighting) force. Both belong to same group but one is "greater" than the other.
hydroep wrote:One of the articles suggesting this is all a homophobic attack on prominent personalities of that persuasion...
hydroep wrote:One of the articles suggesting this is all a homophobic attack on prominent personalities of that persuasion...
Remember when PNM Darrell Smith poked fun at the MP for Princess town. The express was the first to run with it to embarrass the MPRedman wrote:hydroep wrote:One of the articles suggesting this is all a homophobic attack on prominent personalities of that persuasion...
Whike I agree with the Express Editorial...I cant help but think that this is a possibility.
We reaching a point where no one would be willing to serve in public offices-and Im not defending anyone- but the politics is so nasty its hard to decipher what is for the good of the country etc vs what is action taken secular interest
Redman wrote:Well I agree with the express that Lucky's silence is an incorrect position.
Given the situation she needs to say something
De Dragon wrote:You see what SC money gets you? They attack the source of the information, threaten legal action, all while not responding to the allegations. If you've nothing to hide, you don't need all that shielding. It also seems like when you're from Tobago ( or PNM apologist Redman) and inhale enough goat hair like JUHN Scarfy and Winford James, you claim without evidence that "Homophobia" and "UNC collusion" is at play here. Why homophobia? Which of the named parties is homosexual?
The_Honourable wrote:Well you know the talk...
"dey want to hound him out! God will protect him"
blah blah blah
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 158 guests