Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Miktay wrote:How iz offering the lowest wages exploitative?
skylinechild wrote:Miktay wrote:How iz offering the lowest wages exploitative?
you seriously asking that question ???
skylinechild wrote:Miktay wrote:How iz offering the lowest wages exploitative?
you seriously asking that question ???
That's why the employment laws industrial court are in the hands of big bussiness. The odds are stacked against the worker. Unions are paid by bussiness and are a sell out.Redman wrote:skylinechild wrote:Miktay wrote:How iz offering the lowest wages exploitative?
you seriously asking that question ???
Its a real question.
If Im getting some one to work for $1 then the reality is they cant get a better rate...they would be looking.
I hate to break it to you....but any one that works for some one else is working for the MINIMUM that their employer can get them to work for.
And generally we all will go where we can get a better package.
Every business works on an ongoing effort to get more for less.
Culpability for the entire situation however lies with many employers....they are too lazy to treat workers with dignity and respect.
That more than wages is causal to the employees behaviour and performance.
The industrial court is paid off by big bussiness. You may think that your lawyer is on you side but that is not so. Most often they get a kick back to loose your case.Redman wrote:Well I disagree.
A friend who does alot of these cases says its a balancing act now....cuz on both sides you have more fundamentally dishonest people.
So the Ind Court has to sift through info and decide on the balance of the evidence.
That said-if a good employer isnt very very careful and scrupulous with the paperwork-they WILL be exploited by a crooked employee and the ever present bush lawyers.
If an employer can not disprove the employee they will end up settling with cash for an imaginary wrong...
HAPPENS EVERY DAY.
Nah dem PNM ppl don't want white man ruleruffneck_12 wrote:
Oil spoil we. We have easy money coming in so we don't feel the need to work as hard.
Barbados wasn't blessed with oil like us, it's 439 square km. Trinidad is 5,131 square km.
How come they're up to our level when they have less resources than us?
Trinidadians cannot run Trinidad. Bring back the British. God bless the Queen.
skylinechild wrote:Miktay wrote:How iz offering the lowest wages exploitative?
you seriously asking that question ???
It's a pain and time consuming doing any government transaction.Ben_spanna wrote:#1 example of this terrible work Ethic is the Public Service of Trinidad and Tobago, lead by an even worse example.(pity he had a jetski there that day)
I spoke about this years ago. But as usual I got told I am anti trin, bussines ectMiktay wrote:Allyuh ever went Min of Legal Affairs?
that place so disorganized iz no joke...nobody know what going on...
After spending 3 hours trying to figure out how it does wuk...they carry mih in the back office where while perusing silver fish invested ledgers from the 1960s there was an ongoing display of who cud wine bess 4 carnival by some of the female staff...
I was entertained and disgusted at the same time...
zoom rader wrote:Nah dem PNM ppl don't want white man ruleruffneck_12 wrote:
Oil spoil we. We have easy money coming in so we don't feel the need to work as hard.
Barbados wasn't blessed with oil like us, it's 439 square km. Trinidad is 5,131 square km.
How come they're up to our level when they have less resources than us?
Trinidadians cannot run Trinidad. Bring back the British. God bless the Queen.
Miktay wrote:skylinechild wrote:Miktay wrote:How iz offering the lowest wages exploitative?
you seriously asking that question ???
If I offering $50 a day for light labor wuk employees could say no.
Nobody holding a gun to their head.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], VII and 237 guests