Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
maj. tom wrote:A possible legal work around for this. Keep the guns keep the 2nd Amendment. Just make ammo impossible to obtain except by military. Make it illegal for non civilians to possess ammunition of calibers over. 22 or not used for hunting, must have a hunting permit. Some people can make their own but the quality won't be as good and it's time consuming. They may have to legally redefine what ammunition is compared to arms.
But again, America loves these mass shooting affairs, so change will never happen.
De Dragon wrote:^^^ Yes, that's a legitimate solution, more guns. Who are to be the holder of these guns? Teachers? Safety Officers? Yes, according to Orange Cancer. Imagine acknowledging a problem so serious as to advocate arming teachers, but nothing on proactively limiting access to AR-15 type weapons for kids. What the actual fack!
Redman wrote:De Dragon wrote:^^^ Yes, that's a legitimate solution, more guns. Who are to be the holder of these guns? Teachers? Safety Officers? Yes, according to Orange Cancer. Imagine acknowledging a problem so serious as to advocate arming teachers, but nothing on proactively limiting access to AR-15 type weapons for kids. What the actual fack!
You clearly don't understand the word proactive.
Continue the fight on policy.
By all means try to ban the guns.
The ban on guns will work ...just like the ban on drugs.
Except that you have constitutional challenges to face at every level.
So right or wrong it will take years.
At best.
What until then?
What do you suggest to prevent a shooting next month.?
If your kids in a school that is targeted...would you prefer a defense using a legislative agenda?
Or a weapon capable of stopping the threat in order to save the kids.?
Your hypocrisy is what you need to acknowledge.
Redman wrote:To be fair...a case of guns would not make a difference if a person is not willing to use them.
I'm waiting on a solid alternative to protecting the schools today.
Redman wrote:Well sure....but existing law enables them to appoint others that are willing to do the job...
My view is simply that the existing on site security measures are obviously not enough.
And active shooter requires an active response...not policy change
In the hours after the shooting, people who knew Mr. Cruz described him as a “troubled kid” who enjoyed showing off his firearms, bragging about killing animals and whose mother would resort to calling the police to have them come to their home to try to talk some sense into him. At a school with about 3,000 students, Mr. Cruz stayed to himself and had few friends but struck fear in some students with erratic behavior and an affinity for violence.
“He always had guns on him,” the student, who did not give his name, told WFOR-TV. “The crazy stuff that he did was not right for school, and he got kicked out of school multiple times for that kind of stuff.”
Jim Gard, a math teacher at Stoneman Douglas High School, said in an interview that Mr. Cruz was a student in his class during the first semester of the 2016-17 school year. In the class, he was quiet and not disruptive, Mr. Gard said.
But he recalled that school administrators became concerned last year about Mr. Cruz’s behavior and alerted the faculty. “We received emails about him from the administration,” Mr. Gard said in an interview, adding that he did not recall the specific issues.
FBI was warned about alleged shooter nearly 5 months ago, tipster says
Ben Bennight, the 36-year-old YouTube video blogger from Mississippi, noticed in September an alarming comment on a video he'd posted. He told CNN he immediately contacted the FBI.
"Im going to be a professional school shooter," read the comment, left by a user with the name Nikolas Cruz, the same name of the suspected shooter who opened fire at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School on Wednesday, killing at least 17 people.
A law enforcement official told CNN earlier Thursday the FBI had received two reports regarding potential threats from the shooter.
Armed school resource officer stayed outside as Florida shooting unfolded, sheriff says
Parkland, Florida (CNN)The armed school resource deputy at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, waited outside the school building as the shooting unfolded last week, officials said.
Scot Peterson never went in after taking a position on the west side of the building, Broward County Sheriff Scott Israel said at a Thursday afternoon news conference.
Peterson resigned after he was suspended without pay by Israel pending an internal investigation into his actions during the shooting that left 17 people dead, Israel said. Peterson was eligible for retirement.
Israel made the decision to suspend Peterson -- who was armed and in uniform at the time of the shooting -- after interviewing the deputy and reviewing footage and witness statements, he said.
"What I saw was a deputy arrive at the west side of building 12, take up a position," Israel said of the video. "And he never went in."
Redman wrote:De Dragon wrote:^^^ Yes, that's a legitimate solution, more guns. Who are to be the holder of these guns? Teachers? Safety Officers? Yes, according to Orange Cancer. Imagine acknowledging a problem so serious as to advocate arming teachers, but nothing on proactively limiting access to AR-15 type weapons for kids. What the actual fack!
You clearly don't understand the word proactive.
Continue the fight on policy.
By all means try to ban the guns.
The ban on guns will work ...just like the ban on drugs.
Except that you have constitutional challenges to face at every level.
So right or wrong it will take years.
At best.
What until then?
What do you suggest to prevent a shooting next month.?
If your kids in a school that is targeted...would you prefer a defense using a legislative agenda?
Or a weapon capable of stopping the threat in order to save the kids.?
Your hypocrisy is what you need to acknowledge.
Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:To be fair the answer may not be more guns. An armed officer was present at this last shooting and did nothing. Literally did nothing but chill.
EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:To be fair the answer may not be more guns. An armed officer was present at this last shooting and did nothing. Literally did nothing but chill.
So because one security officer had a doh care attitude that means everybody with a gun would have a doh care attitude?
Who hired an incompetent security officer? and why isn't more teachers trained in the use of fire arms? if every teacher in every class room had a gun the killer would be dead. Infact he wouldn't bother to go in the school in the first place the only reason he went is because he knew nobody was there to stop him.
Most teachers are liberals, because most higher education institutes in the US like 98% are liberal, so they are taught that guns are bad and you should never use one.
As usual liberalism at its finest.
EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:To be fair the answer may not be more guns. An armed officer was present at this last shooting and did nothing. Literally did nothing but chill.
So because one security officer had a doh care attitude that means everybody with a gun would have a doh care attitude?
Who hired an incompetent security officer? and why isn't more teachers trained in the use of fire arms? if every teacher in every class room had a gun the killer would be dead. Infact he wouldn't bother to go in the school in the first place the only reason he went is because he knew nobody was there to stop him.
Most teachers are liberals, because most higher education institutes in the US like 98% are liberal, so they are taught that guns are bad and you should never use one.
As usual liberalism at its finest.
De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:De Dragon wrote:^^^ Yes, that's a legitimate solution, more guns. Who are to be the holder of these guns? Teachers? Safety Officers? Yes, according to Orange Cancer. Imagine acknowledging a problem so serious as to advocate arming teachers, but nothing on proactively limiting access to AR-15 type weapons for kids. What the actual fack!
You clearly don't understand the word proactive.
Continue the fight on policy.
By all means try to ban the guns.
The ban on guns will work ...just like the ban on drugs.
Except that you have constitutional challenges to face at every level.
So right or wrong it will take years.
At best.
What until then?
What do you suggest to prevent a shooting next month.?
If your kids in a school that is targeted...would you prefer a defense using a legislative agenda?
Or a weapon capable of stopping the threat in order to save the kids.?
Your hypocrisy is what you need to acknowledge.
Like how you and ED ascribe "limit" and "control" the same meaning as ban?
You're being ridiculous and obstinate now, but that is always your fall back position when challenged with facts. You asked for armed officials in the school. Well fack us all, there was one! A mofoing DEPUTY too! I mean if a deputy freezes, a teacher is sure to drop a dime on a shooter ent? The deputy didn't act, so you now claim that more armed personnel are needed. Might as well move the entire Sheriff's Dept. in there while you're at it
Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:
Four armed officers and years of warnings did nothing to stop Nikolas Cruz from massacring 17 people at a high school.
Not one but four sheriff’s deputies hid behind cars instead of storming Marjory Stoneman Douglas HS in Parkland, Fla., during Wednesday’s school shooting, police claimed Friday — as newly released records revealed the Broward County Sheriff’s Office had received at least 18 calls about the troubled teen over the past decade.
Sources from Coral Springs, Fla., Police Department tell CNN that when its officers arrived on the scene Wednesday, they were shocked to find three Broward County Sheriff’s deputies behind their cars with weapons drawn.
The school’s armed resource officer, Broward County Sheriff’s Deputy Scot Peterson, was also outside. He resigned on Thursday after his failure to act was publicly revealed...
...News of the deputies’ apparent inaction came after the sheriff’s office released records showing how many times it had received alarming reports about Cruz, 19, over the years — including two that specifically warned he was a potential school shooter.
Miktay wrote:Coral springs police making Broward County Sherrif look like cowards.Four armed officers and years of warnings did nothing to stop Nikolas Cruz from massacring 17 people at a high school.
Not one but four sheriff’s deputies hid behind cars instead of storming Marjory Stoneman Douglas HS in Parkland, Fla., during Wednesday’s school shooting, police claimed Friday — as newly released records revealed the Broward County Sheriff’s Office had received at least 18 calls about the troubled teen over the past decade.
Sources from Coral Springs, Fla., Police Department tell CNN that when its officers arrived on the scene Wednesday, they were shocked to find three Broward County Sheriff’s deputies behind their cars with weapons drawn.
The school’s armed resource officer, Broward County Sheriff’s Deputy Scot Peterson, was also outside. He resigned on Thursday after his failure to act was publicly revealed...
...News of the deputies’ apparent inaction came after the sheriff’s office released records showing how many times it had received alarming reports about Cruz, 19, over the years — including two that specifically warned he was a potential school shooter.
https://nypost.com/2018/02/23/four-sher ... bc9df7201c
shogun wrote:Not one but four sheriff’s deputies hid behind cars instead of storming Marjory Stoneman Douglas HS in Parkland, Fla., during Wednesday’s school shooting, police claimed Friday — as newly released records revealed the Broward County Sheriff’s Office had received at least 18 calls about the troubled teen over the past decade.
https://nypost.com/2018/02/23/four-sher ... -shooting/
Redman wrote:Nah...save the guns to protect important stuff...like banks,VIPs, and movie stars.
I still waiting on a good suggestion from you.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], matr1x and 232 guests