Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
maj. tom wrote:
Also, do you know that if a doctor does not do his duty that is on par with peer medical practices and current treatments he will be black-marked for malpractice? The choice is yours as a patient to take the advice or treatment, but the doctor has a duty to society that is way beyond what you want imagine.
ismithx wrote:kstt wrote:Worse condition than what? Death?
Left untreated cancer will kill you....
Lack of medications I speaking from personal first hand experience. Doctors experimenting on you like a lab rat I speaking from experience. Should he start and realise I was right? Then what? The damage has been done. Does he start and stop because he already in it?
For many cancers there is a clearly define regimen of treatment that is applied. if you have some extreme/non/standard/special case then basically yes you will HAVE to feel like a lab rat. this is simply how it is, there may not be a clearly defined treatment for your condition.
my experience also tells me it is not as bad as you make it out to be.
Ask anyone who going chemo if they would recommend it. They will tell you they in a "worse condition than before"
it is not pleasant but would you rather not properly treat your condition???? every single medicine has side effects
How many survivors from chemo do you know vs dead ppl?
there are lots of people who go through chemo and survive. for those who may have done chemo and died, who is to say the cancer won't have eventually killed them?
Chemo makes you lose control of your bodily functions. You sheit yourself cause u can't control yourself. That's why I said get a caretaker for help.
there are many different combinations of drugs used and not all of them has the same side effects
God forbid but I rather die slowly and capable rather than die faster.
that is not a guaranteed. good luck with that attitude, some people would rather go through treatment and get better/have a fighting chance than be a defeatist
I personally know a person that passed that warned another person about chemo but the person wanted to try even though warned my the person. The person eventually said they regretted they didn't take the advice but tried because they felt they had to do something. Yes the second person is in the same place as the first.
Fact remains it damages ALL organs! Didn't see you comment on that at all.
I clearly said it is bad, but at the end of the day chemo isn't pseudoscience.
but all of this...
are you a qualified medical doctor to be telling people yes or no to any specific treatment?
maj. tom wrote:hmm real dilemma here... should I listen to a medical specialist who has studied more than 10 years and has 25 years clinical experience, or a YouTube information conspiracy theorist? Real hard choices here.
Also, do you know that if a doctor does not do his duty that is on par with peer medical practices and current treatments he will be black-marked for malpractice? The choice is yours as a patient to take the advice or treatment, but the doctor has a duty to society that is way beyond what you want imagine. And even if he does know something better, that personal research and experience may not be tested and approved. So if he tells you do something that is not currently recognized in medical schools, he has the liability of malpractice when the patient testifies against him in court.
Phone Surgeon wrote:that chemo thing is complicated.......its a very hard decision to make
chemo does firetruck u up.....but sometimes it also makes you live longer
but the person or family is faced with the decision on if living longer with failing organs is worth it, or if they should try to live up their life as much as possible without the chemo. cuz the chemo does really firetruck yuh up
not getting the chemo on time is a next scene
it IS true what they say that in st james they regularly just cancelling sessions because they dont have chemicals or they dont have a pharmacist to mix the chemicals.....
my relative had to go st james AND grande for treatment, at certain points neither of them have the chemicals or pharmacist or whatever
so imagine the flabbergastery where you start chemo, your body weakened due to taking the chemo, the cancer attacking harder cuz your body weak.....and you cant get chemo for a 2-3 weeks because chemicals done, or you could jump out a 10k+ for a single course
it really is a dred situation to be in, and when you experience it, it REAL difficult to make decisions
i know someone who was diagnosed with cancer, he decide he going the Ganja route, refuse to take chemo or meds, and he deteriorate and die within 2 months of getting diagnosed.
but cancer different...and everybody different......
Extreme caution should be exercised if considering it as you are correct about malnutrition being a major concern. It will have to be done under the care of a qualified professional that is familiar with the practice.ismithx wrote:Slartibartfast wrote:Hope things turn out well for your family OP. I heard recently that a 72hr fast (water only for 72 hours) prior to chemotherapy sessions is supposed to increase the effectiveness of the sessions and help limit damage to healthy cells as it forces living cells in the body to protect itself, which cancer cells cannot do. There should be some studies on it. Just something you may be interested in reading up on. I am not a professional in the area so do not take my word for it.
that is a bad idea, during chemo you will need to have you are going to have issues eating, so getting adequate nutrition is important
novastar1 wrote:Got to be careful when sorting all the pseudo science from real medical advice in the thread
aaron17 wrote:Do weed and ganga really help for cancer patients?
aaron17 wrote:So u have to go away to use it of the limitations here?
MG Man wrote:aaron17 wrote:So u have to go away to use it of the limitations here?
just do it on the down-low
but I don't think canabis therapy is a replacement for chemo or radiation tho...just one additional treatment
helps with cancer related pain and nauseaaaron17 wrote:Do weed and ganga really help for cancer patients?
pugboy wrote:So Trevor Sayers have no merit ?
kstt wrote:I stopped when op requested. But I see my name calling. I said I WOULD NOT do chemo. I said a former patient warned about chemo. I said cut sugar, make the body alkaline, try ganja oil.
Doctor could you confirm whether good organs are damaged with chemo? What happens to your kidneys?
Why would I want to treat one issue and get more issues?
It's like the tv ads for depression medication ythe ad lists the rest of the commercial with symptoms while you try to treat your depression.
Doctor, does doing chemo make you sheit yourself? Vomit? Sick until your next treatment when u start to feel better to start all over again?
kstt wrote:Don't do chemo it mashes u up. Any one doing it would adviss you not to. It destroys everything including good organs. More reason not to do chemo is that the hospitals never have the medicine so you get one week then the next you don't then u get 2 weeks later so its spinning top in mud because it is not effective. ganja oil is what you have to get. Very traumatic experience. Get a caretaker from day one cause you will need the help.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests