Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
antlind wrote:Gone are the days when you could sit on the steps of JFK with your girl any hour of the night without fear of being raped or knifed. That was life in uwi when I was there in the 1980s. It’s sad to see that crime has infiltrated every facet of life in Trinidad.
worksux101 wrote:Massively proud of those students for what they did today.
Showed a spine in what’s quickly becoming a spineless country
Keyser Soze wrote:worksux101 wrote:Massively proud of those students for what they did today.
Showed a spine in what’s quickly becoming a spineless country
endorsed to the highest level.
I hope the authorities are watching how normally peaceful law abiding citizens are now willing to take their frustrations to the streets despite the threat of licks and lock up... the fuel and accelerant already there..... people just waiting on the spark.
MaxPower wrote:bluefete wrote:The last thing any government wants is young people protesting, especially certain university students, because they are the ones who start revolutions, social and otherwise.
kstt: Very good question.
Edited
bluefete wrote:$5,000.00 bail and case adjourned to November 16th.
The kinds of pink-based lawyers who are representing them, I wonder if their parents have to sell house and land to pay them or if they are doing it pro-bono (I seriously doubt it) or if the UWI student guild will pick up the tab.
sMASH wrote:bluefete wrote:$5,000.00 bail and case adjourned to November 16th.
The kinds of pink-based lawyers who are representing them, I wonder if their parents have to sell house and land to pay them or if they are doing it pro-bono (I seriously doubt it) or if the UWI student guild will pick up the tab.
judge an all too... they supposed to throw that out.
I wouldnt want to get you vex broLes Bain wrote:It really made my blood boil looking at the arrest video. Man motionless on the ground while multiple police trying to cuff him, then this large jackass finds nothing better to do than press his knee against the man neck.
Them so are the ones to visit in the hospital when cancer hollow them out so you could laugh at them and fill their I.V. bags with piss.
bluefete wrote:I so agree with you but that is not going to happen. They have to make an example of these students (note carefully WHO was arrested) so that the others would boil down into being sheep.
The state wants to destroy them and the Express newspaper is helping with this headline:
https://www.trinidadexpress.com/news/lo ... bb4b7.html
These UWI students are now criminal defendants
Alexander Bruzual Oct 19, 2018 Updated 2 hrs ago
Charged: Ryan Richards and Nathaniel John
TWO students of The University of the West Indies are now criminal defendants.
"Ryan Richards, 22, of Spiaria, and Nathaniel John, 22, of Arima were arrested at the gates to The UWI, St Augustine during a protest by students outraged over the poor security on the campus.
The two appeared before Tunapuna Magistrate Ava Vandenberg-Bailey, charged with the summary offences of disorderly conduct, resisting arrest, and assaulting a police officer.
They pleaded not guilty to the charges.
Get caught up with news from the news leader
Subscribe now and get access to the Trinidad Express E-paper
The students were defended in court by former attorney general John Jeremie SC, Keith Scotland, Ian Brooks, Brain Baig, and Prakash Ramadhar.
Richards and John, who spent the night in police custody, were granted own bail of $5,000 each.
The cases were adjourned to November 16."
With that headline goes their chances of getting a US Visa and so on. Talk about a hatchet job and it makes you wonder ...
Now, I could get into the legal aspects but I will wait for the case to finish.sMASH wrote:bluefete wrote:$5,000.00 bail and case adjourned to November 16th.
The kinds of pink-based lawyers who are representing them, I wonder if their parents have to sell house and land to pay them or if they are doing it pro-bono (I seriously doubt it) or if the UWI student guild will pick up the tab.
judge an all too... they supposed to throw that out.
Would not have had legal fees if the Pigs had acted within reason.bluefete wrote:Me too. LOL.
Now seeing that the UWi administration has promised to pay the legal fees for the students.
UWI admin has also admitted that a female student was sexually assaulted.
So two innocent students, who were protesting for the truth to come out, may have their lives ruined because the same UWI administration LIED to cover their asse-s.
sMASH wrote:Would not have had legal fees if the Pigs had acted within reason.bluefete wrote:Me too. LOL.
Now seeing that the UWi administration has promised to pay the legal fees for the students.
UWI admin has also admitted that a female student was sexually assaulted.
So two innocent students, who were protesting for the truth to come out, may have their lives ruined because the same UWI administration LIED to cover their asse-s.
Next thing they seeing them as future politicians, and decide to groom them from early..Keyser Soze wrote:With that line up of lawyers i suspect they defending pro-bono......
I hope they get proper justice, but i also hope the other protesting students understand that for any change to be made there needs to be sacrifice and that this is just the tip of the iceberg.
GVTrini07 wrote:Protest Yes! Making it an inconvenient situation for
1 persons who cannot assist with you plight
2 Have nothing to do with the situation
3.Blocking freedom of access egress of ordinary citizens
Is wrong and should be dealt with accordingly.
When they blocking people who just trying tuh go about they own business and bawling sue sue sue, that was not aggression?
I will say Protest Yes, but don’t have innocents affected! Cause it goes the other way as well!
ProtonPowder wrote:GVTrini07 wrote:Protest Yes! Making it an inconvenient situation for
1 persons who cannot assist with you plight
2 Have nothing to do with the situation
3.Blocking freedom of access egress of ordinary citizens
Is wrong and should be dealt with accordingly.
When they blocking people who just trying tuh go about they own business and bawling sue sue sue, that was not aggression?
I will say Protest Yes, but don’t have innocents affected! Cause it goes the other way as well!
Then what do you suggest? They already held the protest at the absolute most considerate time of the school week, burned no tyres and werent violent.
GVTrini07 wrote:ProtonPowder wrote:GVTrini07 wrote:Protest Yes! Making it an inconvenient situation for
1 persons who cannot assist with you plight
2 Have nothing to do with the situation
3.Blocking freedom of access egress of ordinary citizens
Is wrong and should be dealt with accordingly.
When they blocking people who just trying tuh go about they own business and bawling sue sue sue, that was not aggression?
I will say Protest Yes, but don’t have innocents affected! Cause it goes the other way as well!
Then what do you suggest? They already held the protest at the absolute most considerate time of the school week, burned no tyres and werent violent.
Protest Yes! But when you cause inconvience to others who are not part of the problem or soloution, do you expect them to sympathize with your cause? I am not suggesting anything! They are big people and should be expected to conduct themselves in a manner befitting such, not follow big people with 2 year old mentality.
Years ago, a school principal used to say, we have a lot of followers and not true leaders. All it takes is 1 jackarse to start something and the rest does follow.
Does burning tires is in your belief garners sympathy to your cause? Only those who thinks like those who burning the tires.
Does distressing innocent ganners sympathy to your cause? Only if you think like them!
So just because we feel we are not being heard or not getting what is needed (be it right or wrong), it gives us the authority or right or what ever you want to call it, to distress others who are not involved! I hear all yuh!
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 146 guests