Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
timelapse wrote:Social Justice supersedes the law of the land, we are in 2018.Lets organise a football match on the highway and get a police escort.Makes all the sense in the world, we have a right to play football on the highway.If you do not support this, you are a bigot oppressing the football community of this country. Anybody want to play?
kamakazi wrote:The activity is considered illegal unless permission is given... But they had a police escort, so I believe that permission was granted for this.
vaiostation wrote:Only reason this debate still going on is because the people killed was of the 1% crew. If it was anybody else no one would have cared...
Soul Collector wrote:If a sign or a law supposed to make you feel better/safer to ride yuh bike on the highway or whatever damn road here, well by all means go ahead but don't complain when sheit like this happen if you willingly putting your life in danger and expect any trinis to give a flying ass about you and your life. They already have no regard for their own lives so who d hell is you? 1% or not, you will get lick down the same way, dead the same way. But go brave.
Soul Collector wrote:If a sign or a law supposed to make you feel better/safer to ride yuh bike on the highway or whatever damn road here, well by all means go ahead but don't complain when sheit like this happen if you willingly putting your life in danger and expect any trinis to give a flying ass about you and your life. They already have no regard for their own lives so who d hell is you? 1% or not, you will get lick down the same way, dead the same way. But go brave.
I decided to disect your argument to try to understand the thinking behind your point of view. I see now that there wasn't any. I apologise for my mistake.Soul Collector wrote:Honestly, what's so hard to understand that you felt the need to dissect this argument of mine?
Everyone's beating up, and if there are in fact laws put in place/changed to help safeguard cyclists on the roadways, what exactly is still going to stop idiots from being idiots and ending up with the same result as what happened here? The sign going to protect you? The sign going to make drivers suddenly care about their own lives much less yours?
If you think trinis that considerate and you still feel like braving our roads, which aren't even safe to be on in your own vehicle and choose to go out on a bicycle then like I said, go brave.
I'm my personal opinion, I consider that action to be careless and stupid. I will never feel at ease on a bicycle on a highway in Trinidad. Hell, I don't even feel safe walking out in a car park or even riding my lil BMX around the neighborhood like I used to when I was younger.
As for not bothering to concern myself with the actions of these people; why should I? People dying left and right here everyday. People, children, unborn children getting lick up and lick down. You think I have more concern for them or less? What exactly you trying to find out? Ask directly and I'll give you an answer.
Typically, a bicycle is classified as a vehicle but not a motor vehicle.timelapse wrote:Hypothetical question, if a cyclist had swerved and caused a car to crash, who would be liable?
And how would the car owner's losses be compensated?
Slartibartfast wrote:I decided to disect your argument to try to understand the thinking behind your point of view. I see now that there wasn't any. I apologise for my mistake.
Soul Collector wrote:Slartibartfast wrote:I decided to disect your argument to try to understand the thinking behind your point of view. I see now that there wasn't any. I apologise for my mistake.
Sure thing pal, lol. Hope you feeling better inside now that you got that out.
DJ Q wrote:Genuine question about that... are those bicycle lanes on roads with a speed limit of or around 100km/h?
pugboy wrote:They probably dont have speed limits
However in many big cities where you normally expect a human powered bike to be less than 20mph
They are having problems with the ebikes which can go over 25-30 easilyDJ Q wrote:Genuine question about that... are those bicycle lanes on roads with a speed limit of or around 100km/h?
timelapse wrote:Hypothetical question, if a cyclist had swerved and caused a car to crash, who would be liable?
And how would the car owner's losses be compensated?
crazybalhead wrote:timelapse wrote:Hypothetical question, if a cyclist had swerved and caused a car to crash, who would be liable?
And how would the car owner's losses be compensated?
The only person to cause YOUR car to crash is YOU.
Bicycle lanes in the city and urban areas.Ben_spanna wrote:Almost every developing country in the world is putting more and more bicycle lanes and provisions in place to protect them, and Trinidads ignorant mases turning this incident into a pappy show saying a seta crap about its the 1% and blah blah blah...……. we are not progressing as a nation, we are going backwards!
pugboy wrote:They probably dont have speed limits
However in many big cities where you normally expect a human powered bike to be less than 20mph
They are having problems with the ebikes which can go over 25-30 easilyDJ Q wrote:Genuine question about that... are those bicycle lanes on roads with a speed limit of or around 100km/h?
DJ Q wrote:pugboy wrote:They probably dont have speed limits
However in many big cities where you normally expect a human powered bike to be less than 20mph
They are having problems with the ebikes which can go over 25-30 easilyDJ Q wrote:Genuine question about that... are those bicycle lanes on roads with a speed limit of or around 100km/h?
I'm not talking about a speed limit for the bike.
I'm seriously asking... what country has a bike lane on a road where vehicles travel at 100 km/h?