Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
She is probably traumatisedrspann wrote:I wonder how Nalini making out with all the African advertisements on StarPlus TV.
Penal woman sues Amplia for revealing her racial rants
Azard Ali
THE woman whose racial rant against the Prime Minister was exposed on Facebook has sued Amplia Communications for breaching her right to telephone confidentiality.
Nalini Ramai filed the lawsuit on Friday in the San Fernando High Court, contending that her remarks about not wanting to see Rowley instead of her East-Indian Zee-TV programming ought not to have been disclosed to the public.
Amplia Communications (formerly Massy Communications), is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Telecommunication Services of TT (TSTT), providing wireless communications for businesses and homes.
Ramai, of Debe, south Trinidad, is suing for defamation and wants Amplia to compensate her financially for breach of confidentiality.
Filed by attorney Jeevan Andrew Rampersad, her lawsuit said that on April 12 she telephoned Bmobile and complained to an agent that her Zee-TV channel had been interrupted by a broadcast of Rowley to supporters of the PNM.
Admitting she made derogatory comments about Rowley, Ramai is accusing Amplia of posting the recorded conversation on Facebook for millions of people to hear.
She further contended that her Facebook profile photo was posted as well as her address. The audio and photo were left online for about a week before they were removed, the lawsuit said.
Ramai said she made an official apology to the Prime Minister in a telephone conversation, but was subjected to a barrage of criticisms and threats on Facebook.
The lawsuit said, "The recording posted by Amplia and or its agents caused a forum chat regarding the said racial comment against the prime minister wherein the claimant was cursed, humiliated, called a racist and or threatened with her life."
She also said that on July 19, Amplia, through attorneys MG Daly & Company, acknowledged it made the recording, but denied it was responsible for the Facebook posts.
rspann wrote:She should win and then get charged for using racial undertones or whatever the charge is. Then Growlers should sue her for calling him a n igger and disrespecting him and his office. She real shameless to do that after the whole country heard her rants. She should be ashamed.
.is how 99% of indians in this country feels about Africans thats why you will see them here defending the nasty beyotch like them selves. They are very racial.
matr1x wrote:Ashamed?
I am beginning to wonder if Trinidad too polite. Somebody finally had enough.
Also, what amplia staff did was a breech of contract.
Dat no undertones, dat was overtones.rspann wrote:She should win and then get charged for using racial undertones or whatever the charge is. Then Growlers should sue her for calling him a n igger and disrespecting him and his office. She real shameless to do that after the whole country heard her rants. She should be ashamed.
Everybody should be paid to cuss up Rowley.airuma wrote:I wonder how much money/ compensation this woman getting for this stunt? Can’t ignore the timing!
Those people are such room zaders.j.o.e wrote:The sad part about Trinidad is that some people choose to overlook and/or downplay the racist rant because they share the same political ideology as the culprit. Makes you wonder what people say in the privacy of their homes.
I cuss PNM and Rowley everyday.K74T wrote:Those people are such room zaders.j.o.e wrote:The sad part about Trinidad is that some people choose to overlook and/or downplay the racist rant because they share the same political ideology as the culprit. Makes you wonder what people say in the privacy of their homes.
j.o.e wrote:The sad part about Trinidad is that some people choose to overlook and/or downplay the racist rant because they share the same political ideology as the culprit. Makes you wonder what people say in the privacy of their homes.
airuma wrote:j.o.e wrote:The sad part about Trinidad is that some people choose to overlook and/or downplay the racist rant because they share the same political ideology as the culprit. Makes you wonder what people say in the privacy of their homes.
What people say in the privacy of their home is their business. No need for anyone on the outside to wonder about it IMHO.
BTW, is Amplia a popular choice in Penal?
j.o.e wrote:I prefer openly racist ppl like Zr even though I have no idea if he’s racist outside of tuner. We don’t know who he is in real life. Closer racists is he real kants imo
matix wrote:j.o.e wrote:I prefer openly racist ppl like Zr even though I have no idea if he’s racist outside of tuner. We don’t know who he is in real life. Closer racists is he real kants imo
So your logic is that because zr doesn’t support pnm and is vocal about it, that’s racist?
This is Trini , where if you dont suppprt PNM you are viewed as racistsmatix wrote:j.o.e wrote:I prefer openly racist ppl like Zr even though I have no idea if he’s racist outside of tuner. We don’t know who he is in real life. Closer racists is he real kants imo
So your logic is that because zr doesn’t support pnm and is vocal about it, that’s racist?
This is where Trini needs data protection laws.88sins wrote:airuma wrote:j.o.e wrote:The sad part about Trinidad is that some people choose to overlook and/or downplay the racist rant because they share the same political ideology as the culprit. Makes you wonder what people say in the privacy of their homes.
What people say in the privacy of their home is their business. No need for anyone on the outside to wonder about it IMHO.
BTW, is Amplia a popular choice in Penal?
exactly
yuh could be as racist, illiterate, ignorant and idiotic as yuh want within the privacy of your own personal space. but just cuz yuh home in yuh house that eh mean yuh could visit that kinda stupidity on ppl outside yuh house.
as regards the suit, it have no way on this big blue marble she have any sort of a case.
for her suit to have merit, and to win a case against amplia for breach of confidentiality, both sides must agree that any and all interactions between both parties must at all times be kept private and confidential.
I doubt that there's any such directly agreed upon statement or implied suggestion in the contract, but the recording you hear when you call neither states nor implies any level of confidentiality. she may possibly have a reasonable expectation of confidentiality, but the law ain't about reasonable expectations, and she tossed reasonable out the window the moment she started cussin and subjecting the csr to her vile remarks.
i wonder tho.
if she gets a magistrate of African descent to hear that case, what she go do? say she feel he may be biased against her and unable to render a fair and impartial verdict and request an Indian magistrate?
Jam toe-tee sessions with arse wari most likelyrspann wrote:Who whistle stuarty blowing?
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: [X]~Outlaw, adnj, Google [Bot] and 119 guests