Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
De Dragon wrote:timelapse wrote:Yuh know, if was a Maha Sabha school, allyuh was already calling for a public beheading of Sat Maharaj.That knot up hairstyle not even fit for working in KFC, like i suspected, wrong and strong entitled mentality
What exactly is wrong with the hairstyle?
As you say doctor.... If one come with that hairstyle... Would you still be singing the same song.... Just wanted to find out (actually ok with the style shown in the article linked above)screwbash wrote:is not wah outside d head buh wah inside d head. allyuh radder she have nice stright hair and spend hours by the heredresser dan study she school book. allyuh radder she make pick up bad habbit from dem ole hoes by the hair dresser and make porn in skool and look for taxi man tuh pay the hair dresser bill every week? look pretty pretty and get breed from som drug man and make more criminal like majority ah laventille and environs? leh d gyul feel comfortable how she want and study she skool book and come ah next doctor and she mite be d one to save your child life one day.
screwbash wrote:is not wah outside d head buh wah inside d head. allyuh radder she have nice stright hair and spend hours by the heredresser dan study she school book. allyuh radder she make pick up bad habbit from dem ole hoes by the hair dresser and make porn in skool and look for taxi man tuh pay the hair dresser bill every week? look pretty pretty and get breed from som drug man and make more criminal like majority ah laventille and environs? leh d gyul feel comfortable how she want and study she skool book and come ah next doctor and she mite be d one to save your child life one day.
matix wrote:screwbash wrote:is not wah outside d head buh wah inside d head. allyuh radder she have nice stright hair and spend hours by the heredresser dan study she school book. allyuh radder she make pick up bad habbit from dem ole hoes by the hair dresser and make porn in skool and look for taxi man tuh pay the hair dresser bill every week? look pretty pretty and get breed from som drug man and make more criminal like majority ah laventille and environs? leh d gyul feel comfortable how she want and study she skool book and come ah next doctor and she mite be d one to save your child life one day.
What school did you attend?
timelapse wrote:De Dragon wrote:timelapse wrote:Yuh know, if was a Maha Sabha school, allyuh was already calling for a public beheading of Sat Maharaj.That knot up hairstyle not even fit for working in KFC, like i suspected, wrong and strong entitled mentality
What exactly is wrong with the hairstyle?
Whats wrong with a boy having a mohawk?
timelapse wrote:It does not fit into the appropriate school hairstyles worn by females, else the the school would not have a problem with it.
If you see nothing wrong with a school boy having a mohawk n school ..thats tells me a lot.
How about this?
Abandon all dress codes, rules and regulations for everybody,nobody can say they being discriminated against.
How would that work for you?
timelapse wrote:It does not fit into the appropriate school hairstyles worn by females, else the the school would not have a problem with it.
If you see nothing wrong with a school boy having a mohawk n school ..thats tells me a lot.
How about this?
Abandon all dress codes, rules and regulations for everybody,nobody can say they being discriminated against.
How would that work for you?
timelapse wrote:What is appropriate is deemed by the school and PTA, not you or the jury of facebook. These kinda things undermine the discipline that the school is trying to instill.But I forget is 2019.Discipline is a violation of people basic rights.Not my problem yes.I wish that you have entitled people as your employees.I honestly do.
matix wrote:I attended St. Stephens and they have always been strict when it comes to hairstyle, uniform and general dress code. Shoes must be black and black alone, black socks (during assembly they did uniform checks), black belt, no baggy pants (my days), shirt collar must be normal (not the style where it’s folded and ironed kinda upright), girls were only allowed a green accessory in their hair and it must be a ‘simple’ style and a list of others. Anything that was out of place would result in you being sent to the principals office where they will contact your parents then send you home. If you reached late for school without a valid excuse (written) you had to pay $1. That was a lot in my days considering it was a $1 to travel to school. But you get the point, it’s always been that way with them. Back then people actually obeyed rules if you wanted your child to attend a ‘good’ school.
mitch1980 wrote:matix wrote:I attended St. Stephens and they have always been strict when it comes to hairstyle, uniform and general dress code. Shoes must be black and black alone, black socks (during assembly they did uniform checks), black belt, no baggy pants (my days), shirt collar must be normal (not the style where it’s folded and ironed kinda upright), girls were only allowed a green accessory in their hair and it must be a ‘simple’ style and a list of others. Anything that was out of place would result in you being sent to the principals office where they will contact your parents then send you home. If you reached late for school without a valid excuse (written) you had to pay $1. That was a lot in my days considering it was a $1 to travel to school. But you get the point, it’s always been that way with them. Back then people actually obeyed rules if you wanted your child to attend a ‘good’ school.
Looks like we attended the same school during the same time period- 90s
Back then adhering to the school rules both formal and informal proved to be a plus for persons today. Respect for Persons in workplace and society as a whole something I see that is lacking with many school students today.
Sometimes a compromise must be done.
I remember there was a student who wanted to wear a Hijab. Principal said no problem but it must be green as that is the color of the female headwear/ accessories.
matix wrote: people actually obeyed rules if you wanted your child to attend a ‘good’ school.
Rovin wrote:mitch1980 wrote:matix wrote:I attended St. Stephens and they have always been strict when it comes to hairstyle, uniform and general dress code. Shoes must be black and black alone, black socks (during assembly they did uniform checks), black belt, no baggy pants (my days), shirt collar must be normal (not the style where it’s folded and ironed kinda upright), girls were only allowed a green accessory in their hair and it must be a ‘simple’ style and a list of others. Anything that was out of place would result in you being sent to the principals office where they will contact your parents then send you home. If you reached late for school without a valid excuse (written) you had to pay $1. That was a lot in my days considering it was a $1 to travel to school. But you get the point, it’s always been that way with them. Back then people actually obeyed rules if you wanted your child to attend a ‘good’ school.
Looks like we attended the same school during the same time period- 90s
Back then adhering to the school rules both formal and informal proved to be a plus for persons today. Respect for Persons in workplace and society as a whole something I see that is lacking with many school students today.
Sometimes a compromise must be done.
I remember there was a student who wanted to wear a Hijab. Principal said no problem but it must be green as that is the color of the female headwear/ accessories.
i too went secondary school in d 90s , couva govt sec [not d junior sec] , from d day u pass for that school & they gave u ur book list they also give all d rules regarding attire , any deviation u were immediately told to fix it or bring yuh mother & father to school next morning . Rules were clear set in stone & if u didnt want to obey it they tell u go look for another school . I dont see anything wrong with that back then & even in todays time .
It look like some of u here want d schools to have a 100+ page catalog of pictures showing every single known hairstyles of what is accepted & what is not ....
zoom rader wrote:If that is the girl natural hair then leave her alone. However if it is weave then that's another topic. I hope this lady wins her case on natural hair.
Why should a person be subjected to their natural hair.
Still does not matter it's her hair and her image.matix wrote:zoom rader wrote:If that is the girl natural hair then leave her alone. However if it is weave then that's another topic. I hope this lady wins her case on natural hair.
Why should a person be subjected to their natural hair.
The issue is about the hairstyle.
zoom rader wrote:Still does not matter it's her hair and her image.matix wrote:zoom rader wrote:If that is the girl natural hair then leave her alone. However if it is weave then that's another topic. I hope this lady wins her case on natural hair.
Why should a person be subjected to their natural hair.
The issue is about the hairstyle.
School image is to tell Afro kids they can't wear their natural hair?timelapse wrote:zoom rader wrote:Still does not matter it's her hair and her image.matix wrote:zoom rader wrote:If that is the girl natural hair then leave her alone. However if it is weave then that's another topic. I hope this lady wins her case on natural hair.
Why should a person be subjected to their natural hair.
The issue is about the hairstyle.
WRONG..This is about the school's image.Either conform or GTFO
zoom rader wrote:School image is to tell Afro kids they can't wear their natural hair?timelapse wrote:zoom rader wrote:Still does not matter it's her hair and her image.matix wrote:zoom rader wrote:If that is the girl natural hair then leave her alone. However if it is weave then that's another topic. I hope this lady wins her case on natural hair.
Why should a person be subjected to their natural hair.
The issue is about the hairstyle.
WRONG..This is about the school's image.Either conform or GTFO
timelapse wrote:zoom rader wrote:School image is to tell Afro kids they can't wear their natural hair?timelapse wrote:zoom rader wrote:Still does not matter it's her hair and her image.matix wrote:zoom rader wrote:If that is the girl natural hair then leave her alone. However if it is weave then that's another topic. I hope this lady wins her case on natural hair.
Why should a person be subjected to their natural hair.
The issue is about the hairstyle.
WRONG..This is about the school's image.Either conform or GTFO
Natural hair doh come in Bantu knots hoss.
88sins wrote:timelapse wrote:zoom rader wrote:School image is to tell Afro kids they can't wear their natural hair?timelapse wrote:zoom rader wrote:Still does not matter it's her hair and her image.matix wrote:zoom rader wrote:If that is the girl natural hair then leave her alone. However if it is weave then that's another topic. I hope this lady wins her case on natural hair.
Why should a person be subjected to their natural hair.
The issue is about the hairstyle.
WRONG..This is about the school's image.Either conform or GTFO
Natural hair doh come in Bantu knots hoss.
this is interesting. so by that standard if a child with rastafarian parents that has a ras himself or herself was enrolled in that school and the principal took issue with that child's dreadlocks, you cool with the principal insisting that those locks be removed then? and don't try to say that's different because rasta is a religion and she can't discriminate against religion.
this whole mess is about who finds whether it's appropriate or not what way whom keeps the hair on their heads. that right there is a matter of personal preference based on hair style being projected onto the child. So what's to stop that bias at the way the childs hair is kept? What's to stop it from changing to a bias about hair texture? or skin color? or ethnicity? or where they live?
it have more important issues for the child and principal to busy themselves with than that nonsense.
Anybody leave their hair unattended long enough will get dreads or some form thereof.What is the big deal about having Bantu knots? Is is some monumental part of being afro? Why was this never an issue before.It a a fashion statement, nothing more. This real issue is that rules are no longer important .If you voice big enough, you can break whatever rules you want and cry discrimination. #because_slavery.
The problem is that not everybody subscribes to that kind of entitled thinking.Is either obey rules or have none at all.Seems that you prefer the latter.Take away all the school's code of conduct and dress code while you are at it, because somewhere down the line , somebody going to draw that discrimination card again over some frivolous nonsense. My school principal in my days would have even even entertained this folly .
But for real tho, somebody help out the poor child nah. I feel like the principal like she going through a drought. I sure if one ah allyuh gee she a lil sumn allyuh go see how fast this whole problem go just cease to exist.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests