Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
rspann wrote:Your father in law have more money than plenty 1% . Pugboy know I is ah adopted 1% ,not blood .
ruffneck_12 wrote:RBphoto wrote:You seem upset
One could go as far as to say that he may be a bit perturbed.
nick639v2 wrote:rspann wrote:Your father in law have more money than plenty 1% . Pugboy know I is ah adopted 1% ,not blood .
Hahaha.. daz he and he by himself, I far from thatruffneck_12 wrote:RBphoto wrote:You seem upset
One could go as far as to say that he may be a bit perturbed.
Screenshot_20191002-072325__01.jpeg
rspann wrote:Actually he seems discombobulated.
sMASH wrote:probably banks could reduce the fees they charge per transaction.
and u migrate to a fone payment system like what they do in china and africa
fleck this blasted sh!t hole country.
timelapse wrote:sMASH wrote:probably banks could reduce the fees they charge per transaction.
and u migrate to a fone payment system like what they do in china and africa
fleck this blasted sh!t hole country.
Or tax we MC like 'developed ' countries that we so aspiring to be like.
Trinidadians don't know about harsh taxing as yet
timelapse wrote:sMASH wrote:probably banks could reduce the fees they charge per transaction.
and u migrate to a fone payment system like what they do in china and africa
fleck this blasted sh!t hole country.
Or tax we MC like 'developed ' countries that we so aspiring to be like.
Trinidadians don't know about harsh taxing as yet
regone wrote:timelapse wrote:sMASH wrote:probably banks could reduce the fees they charge per transaction.
and u migrate to a fone payment system like what they do in china and africa
fleck this blasted sh!t hole country.
Or tax we MC like 'developed ' countries that we so aspiring to be like.
Trinidadians don't know about harsh taxing as yet
Most trini's dont understand value for money, right now we are not getting value for our tax money so why tax more? to pay more for the same sheit.....
Trinidadians are already paying "developed country taxes."src1983 wrote:timelapse wrote:sMASH wrote:probably banks could reduce the fees they charge per transaction.
and u migrate to a fone payment system like what they do in china and africa
fleck this blasted sh!t hole country.
Or tax we MC like 'developed ' countries that we so aspiring to be like.
Trinidadians don't know about harsh taxing as yet
You getting developed world services?
With all that tax a man with 1000USD in US, has more purchasing power than a man with 1,000TTD in Trinidad
src1983 wrote:timelapse wrote:sMASH wrote:probably banks could reduce the fees they charge per transaction.
and u migrate to a fone payment system like what they do in china and africa
fleck this blasted sh!t hole country.
Or tax we MC like 'developed ' countries that we so aspiring to be like.
Trinidadians don't know about harsh taxing as yet
You getting developed world services?
With all that tax a man with 1000USD in US, has more purchasing power than a man with 1,000TTD in Trinidad
timelapse wrote:src1983 wrote:timelapse wrote:sMASH wrote:probably banks could reduce the fees they charge per transaction.
and u migrate to a fone payment system like what they do in china and africa
fleck this blasted sh!t hole country.
Or tax we MC like 'developed ' countries that we so aspiring to be like.
Trinidadians don't know about harsh taxing as yet
You getting developed world services?
With all that tax a man with 1000USD in US, has more purchasing power than a man with 1,000TTD in Trinidad
Banks doh business...Money affis make.
The banks are not running a charity, they have overheads, workers to pay , servers and equipment to maintain etc..
You don't want that, keep your money at home. They don't HAVE to do anything.Bad for customer service but thats facts...Try telling KFC to drop their fees, and they have the most terrible service out there.But your sale doesn't matter to them someone else will use their services.
I am not defending bank or business for over charging for things, but my view is that they don't need to change their fees because you think its unfair.Just take your business elsewhere ...
sMASH wrote:timelapse wrote:src1983 wrote:timelapse wrote:sMASH wrote:probably banks could reduce the fees they charge per transaction.
and u migrate to a fone payment system like what they do in china and africa
fleck this blasted sh!t hole country.
Or tax we MC like 'developed ' countries that we so aspiring to be like.
Trinidadians don't know about harsh taxing as yet
You getting developed world services?
With all that tax a man with 1000USD in US, has more purchasing power than a man with 1,000TTD in Trinidad
Banks doh business...Money affis make.
The banks are not running a charity, they have overheads, workers to pay , servers and equipment to maintain etc..
You don't want that, keep your money at home. They don't HAVE to do anything.Bad for customer service but thats facts...Try telling KFC to drop their fees, and they have the most terrible service out there.But your sale doesn't matter to them someone else will use their services.
I am not defending bank or business for over charging for things, but my view is that they don't need to change their fees because you think its unfair.Just take your business elsewhere ...
when u check their after tax profits, is allkinda 500 million in profits... IN ONE YEAR!!! they have met their dues, and have excess monies. they can reduce some of thier fees, and still be in a similar financial situation,
the world is trending towards e transactions, therefore, financial institutions such as banks, are a necessary part of commerce. its NOT optional in this day and age. it shoudl be viewed as a public service and regulated to benefit the citizen.
sMASH wrote:well then, they coudl do with some regulations, to ENFORCE some citizen friendly fees.
sMASH wrote:well then, they coudl do with some regulations, to ENFORCE some citizen friendly fees.
timelapse wrote:sMASH wrote:well then, they coudl do with some regulations, to ENFORCE some citizen friendly fees.
They are not in business to be friendly to citizens.They in it to make profits and the more the merrier.The only way to fix this is to boycott them.You cannot badjohn them into doing what you think is fair.This is private sector business, government would be playing fass to interfere, seeing as though no laws are being broken.When their desired profit margins are no longer being met, they will close up shop.The end.
timelapse wrote:sMASH wrote:well then, they coudl do with some regulations, to ENFORCE some citizen friendly fees.
They are not in business to be friendly to citizens.They in it to make profits and the more the merrier.The only way to fix this is to boycott them.You cannot badjohn them into doing what you think is fair.This is private sector business, government would be playing fass to interfere, seeing as though no laws are being broken.When their desired profit margins are no longer being met, they will close up shop.The end.
timelapse wrote:sMASH wrote:well then, they coudl do with some regulations, to ENFORCE some citizen friendly fees.
They are not in business to be friendly to citizens.They in it to make profits and the more the merrier.The only way to fix this is to boycott them.You cannot badjohn them into doing what you think is fair.This is private sector business, government would be playing fass to interfere, seeing as though no laws are being broken.When their desired profit margins are no longer being met, they will close up shop.The end.
Monk BANzai wrote:timelapse wrote:sMASH wrote:well then, they coudl do with some regulations, to ENFORCE some citizen friendly fees.
They are not in business to be friendly to citizens.They in it to make profits and the more the merrier.The only way to fix this is to boycott them.You cannot badjohn them into doing what you think is fair.This is private sector business, government would be playing fass to interfere, seeing as though no laws are being broken.When their desired profit margins are no longer being met, they will close up shop.The end.
im wondering same...true Linx has become a welcomed service over the decades... but if the service isn't available...why is that "unfair"? Since when having a Linx machine considered fair practice? why must one boycott them? Use of the service or not....just asking as one who does make signs like that for a living (not a personal attack to you eh 'lapse....less you lapse and then....lol ok i sthap nao)
timelapse wrote:Monk BANzai wrote:timelapse wrote:sMASH wrote:well then, they coudl do with some regulations, to ENFORCE some citizen friendly fees.
They are not in business to be friendly to citizens.They in it to make profits and the more the merrier.The only way to fix this is to boycott them.You cannot badjohn them into doing what you think is fair.This is private sector business, government would be playing fass to interfere, seeing as though no laws are being broken.When their desired profit margins are no longer being met, they will close up shop.The end.
im wondering same...true Linx has become a welcomed service over the decades... but if the service isn't available...why is that "unfair"? Since when having a Linx machine considered fair practice? why must one boycott them? Use of the service or not....just asking as one who does make signs like that for a living (not a personal attack to you eh 'lapse....less you lapse and then....lol ok i sthap nao)
I din't say it unfair, so YOU LAPSE.What I saying is that people should expect business to pander to their whims in the name of "fairness" And if you have a problem with the people services or fees, take your business elsewhere instead of whining about it until you have your way. My statement was a suggestion to brother Smash who wanted government to enforce a fee structure, which I disagree with.I fed up with this whiny generation of crybaby SJW entitled type behaviour.
If Linda's Linx unavailable, go to their nearest ATM instead of being a panzy, but no, "lewwe light dem up on social media"
nemisis wrote:Consumer affairs cracking down on nothing, I reported a certain grocery opposite palmiste park, the one with the stores above it not the one in front of the intersection, for telling me I can't pay for my order with card because i am also buying a phone card. Passed back out of curiosity a month later and nothing had changed.justheretoreadthecomments wrote:A lot of businesses ask that you make a minimum purchase to be able to use your linx card, because there is a small fee attached to same. Consumer affairs apparently is trying to crack down on this practice so maybe this is the new strategy to say, na fam, cash only.
De Dragon wrote:timelapse wrote:Monk BANzai wrote:timelapse wrote:sMASH wrote:well then, they coudl do with some regulations, to ENFORCE some citizen friendly fees.
They are not in business to be friendly to citizens.They in it to make profits and the more the merrier.The only way to fix this is to boycott them.You cannot badjohn them into doing what you think is fair.This is private sector business, government would be playing fass to interfere, seeing as though no laws are being broken.When their desired profit margins are no longer being met, they will close up shop.The end.
im wondering same...true Linx has become a welcomed service over the decades... but if the service isn't available...why is that "unfair"? Since when having a Linx machine considered fair practice? why must one boycott them? Use of the service or not....just asking as one who does make signs like that for a living (not a personal attack to you eh 'lapse....less you lapse and then....lol ok i sthap nao)
I din't say it unfair, so YOU LAPSE.What I saying is that people should expect business to pander to their whims in the name of "fairness" And if you have a problem with the people services or fees, take your business elsewhere instead of whining about it until you have your way. My statement was a suggestion to brother Smash who wanted government to enforce a fee structure, which I disagree with.I fed up with this whiny generation of crybaby SJW entitled type behaviour.
If Linda's Linx unavailable, go to their nearest ATM instead of being a panzy, but no, "lewwe light dem up on social media"
Even you see the contradiction in that statement right? No one should be allowed to withhold a service on such flimsy, unfair rationale. Also, when proper regulations are not in place, you have the fiasco of Bear Sterns, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, that crashed the US economy in 2008.
timelapse wrote:De Dragon wrote:timelapse wrote:Monk BANzai wrote:timelapse wrote:sMASH wrote:well then, they coudl do with some regulations, to ENFORCE some citizen friendly fees.
They are not in business to be friendly to citizens.They in it to make profits and the more the merrier.The only way to fix this is to boycott them.You cannot badjohn them into doing what you think is fair.This is private sector business, government would be playing fass to interfere, seeing as though no laws are being broken.When their desired profit margins are no longer being met, they will close up shop.The end.
im wondering same...true Linx has become a welcomed service over the decades... but if the service isn't available...why is that "unfair"? Since when having a Linx machine considered fair practice? why must one boycott them? Use of the service or not....just asking as one who does make signs like that for a living (not a personal attack to you eh 'lapse....less you lapse and then....lol ok i sthap nao)
I din't say it unfair, so YOU LAPSE.What I saying is that people should expect business to pander to their whims in the name of "fairness" And if you have a problem with the people services or fees, take your business elsewhere instead of whining about it until you have your way. My statement was a suggestion to brother Smash who wanted government to enforce a fee structure, which I disagree with.I fed up with this whiny generation of crybaby SJW entitled type behaviour.
If Linda's Linx unavailable, go to their nearest ATM instead of being a panzy, but no, "lewwe light dem up on social media"
Even you see the contradiction in that statement right? No one should be allowed to withhold a service on such flimsy, unfair rationale. Also, when proper regulations are not in place, you have the fiasco of Bear Sterns, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, that crashed the US economy in 2008.
Having Linx available is a fundamental right of citizens by your logic..You don't even know why the linx wasn't available in the first place.What it it just wasn't working? Thats real spoiled brat mentality. If my business place is losing money because it more convenient to how you want to pay , is that fair to me? Not your problem ent, because the universe centers around what you want.
De Dragon wrote:timelapse wrote:De Dragon wrote:timelapse wrote:Monk BANzai wrote:timelapse wrote:sMASH wrote:well then, they coudl do with some regulations, to ENFORCE some citizen friendly fees.
They are not in business to be friendly to citizens.They in it to make profits and the more the merrier.The only way to fix this is to boycott them.You cannot badjohn them into doing what you think is fair.This is private sector business, government would be playing fass to interfere, seeing as though no laws are being broken.When their desired profit margins are no longer being met, they will close up shop.The end.
im wondering same...true Linx has become a welcomed service over the decades... but if the service isn't available...why is that "unfair"? Since when having a Linx machine considered fair practice? why must one boycott them? Use of the service or not....just asking as one who does make signs like that for a living (not a personal attack to you eh 'lapse....less you lapse and then....lol ok i sthap nao)
I din't say it unfair, so YOU LAPSE.What I saying is that people should expect business to pander to their whims in the name of "fairness" And if you have a problem with the people services or fees, take your business elsewhere instead of whining about it until you have your way. My statement was a suggestion to brother Smash who wanted government to enforce a fee structure, which I disagree with.I fed up with this whiny generation of crybaby SJW entitled type behaviour.
If Linda's Linx unavailable, go to their nearest ATM instead of being a panzy, but no, "lewwe light dem up on social media"
Even you see the contradiction in that statement right? No one should be allowed to withhold a service on such flimsy, unfair rationale. Also, when proper regulations are not in place, you have the fiasco of Bear Sterns, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, that crashed the US economy in 2008.
Having Linx available is a fundamental right of citizens by your logic..You don't even know why the linx wasn't available in the first place.What it it just wasn't working? Thats real spoiled brat mentality. If my business place is losing money because it more convenient to how you want to pay , is that fair to me? Not your problem ent, because the universe centers around what you want.
Just how long does it have to not be working for you have a fancy sign? If you're losing money because you've got LINX, then you have options, adjust your price accordingly, and let the service be a cost of business item, or GIVE BACK DE FACKING LINX! Your dumb "spoiled brat" comment also shows how out of touch you are with respect to crime.
You make it sound like there is some sort of banking mafia that is making people take LINX
De Dragon wrote:timelapse wrote:De Dragon wrote:timelapse wrote:Monk BANzai wrote:timelapse wrote:sMASH wrote:well then, they coudl do with some regulations, to ENFORCE some citizen friendly fees.
They are not in business to be friendly to citizens.They in it to make profits and the more the merrier.The only way to fix this is to boycott them.You cannot badjohn them into doing what you think is fair.This is private sector business, government would be playing fass to interfere, seeing as though no laws are being broken.When their desired profit margins are no longer being met, they will close up shop.The end.
im wondering same...true Linx has become a welcomed service over the decades... but if the service isn't available...why is that "unfair"? Since when having a Linx machine considered fair practice? why must one boycott them? Use of the service or not....just asking as one who does make signs like that for a living (not a personal attack to you eh 'lapse....less you lapse and then....lol ok i sthap nao)
I din't say it unfair, so YOU LAPSE.What I saying is that people should expect business to pander to their whims in the name of "fairness" And if you have a problem with the people services or fees, take your business elsewhere instead of whining about it until you have your way. My statement was a suggestion to brother Smash who wanted government to enforce a fee structure, which I disagree with.I fed up with this whiny generation of crybaby SJW entitled type behaviour.
If Linda's Linx unavailable, go to their nearest ATM instead of being a panzy, but no, "lewwe light dem up on social media"
Even you see the contradiction in that statement right? No one should be allowed to withhold a service on such flimsy, unfair rationale. Also, when proper regulations are not in place, you have the fiasco of Bear Sterns, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, that crashed the US economy in 2008.
Having Linx available is a fundamental right of citizens by your logic..You don't even know why the linx wasn't available in the first place.What it it just wasn't working? Thats real spoiled brat mentality. If my business place is losing money because it more convenient to how you want to pay , is that fair to me? Not your problem ent, because the universe centers around what you want.
Just how long does it have to not be working for you have a fancy sign? If you're losing money because you've got LINX, then you have options, adjust your price accordingly, and let the service be a cost of business item, or GIVE BACK DE FACKING LINX! Your dumb "spoiled brat" comment also shows how out of touch you are with respect to crime.
You make it sound like there is some sort of banking mafia that is making people take LINX
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 191 guests