Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Excellent point regarding TBN of oils. But thant's especially important for engine protection due to acids developed thru burning fuels particularly fuels with high sulphur. But a high TBN oil is of no relevance for fuel system and injection as that's a separate part of the engine. In other words, poor diesel can wreak havoc on a fuel system, high TBN oil or not.kamakazi wrote:I inform people that if they don't have a mechanical bone in their body change their mind from owning a diesel powered vehicle/s.
It requires more consistent care and attention.
I usually put additives in my fuel every other fill-up; power service diesel kleen(current) and penray diesel fuel conditioner, cause I believe the fuel sold locally is deficient in a couple of areas... Not just sulphur.
Forgot to mention... Synthetic oils and those suited for more stringent emissions standards tend to have lower TBN (total base number) which reduces its ability to neutralize acids. This combined with longer oil drain intervals that manufacturers are pushing, and greater volumes of acid as result of burning high sulphur diesel are compounding the problem
Rovin wrote:does this new diesel fuel have d same effect on older diesel engines from say 10-15yrs ago models ?
i wondering if it will affect my L300 .....
Rovin wrote:nah nah doh put dat kinda goat mouth nuh
L300 is work donkey that no weight does stop , it going like d duracel bunny ....
Rovin wrote:wow i cyar believe i typed dat ...... ............
When the Duracell Bunny debuted in North America in 1973, it was slated to be just a one-shot character in the "Drumming Bunny" advertisement. Duracell purportedly trademarked their bunny, but by 1988, that trademark had lapsed.[3] Sensing an opportunity, Duracell's North American rival Energizer created a parody of the "Drumming Bunny" in 1988. Energizer's parody ad began much as Duracell's original 1973 ad did, except that midway through the discussion of which drumming rabbit would last longest, it was interrupted by the Energizer Bunny, a different pink rabbit wearing sunglasses, flip-flops, and beating a bass drum.[4] Energizer created a multi-year campaign around the Energizer Bunny. While the campaign was regarded as entertaining advertising, the Energizer Bunny was initially often confused for the Duracell Bunny in stores, and between 1988 and 1991, Energizer's market share actually shrank in comparison to Duracell's.[5] Energizer subsequently tuned their advertising campaign, packaging, and in-store displays, successfully growing its market share compared to Duracell in the 1990s. There are significant differences in appearance between the two companies' mascots — the Energizer Bunny wears sunglasses, has larger ears, is a different shade of pink, and has a different body shape. Also, while the Energizer Bunny is a single rabbit, the Duracell Bunnies are a species. The Duracell Bunny advertising campaign has evolved, and Duracell Bunnies are usually depicted as doing something other than beating a drum as they did in the original 1973 advertisement.
Rovin wrote:well well by fluke it turns out i was fortunately right either way , dise b4 my time but i learn something new today
man how u come across such info ? , either u rel ole or u stumbled across this info for whatever reason researching d battery bunny ...
Rovin wrote:does this new diesel fuel have d same effect on older diesel engines from say 10-15yrs ago models ?
i wondering if it will affect my L300 .....
kamakazi wrote:Strange thing though... Nobody is complaining about sulphur causing their injectors to fail... Quite the opposite, the lack of sulphur (ulsd diesel) is causing injector failure in regions where they have it. So it's down to contamination and inadequate cetane
eliteauto wrote:Plenty people who imported euro diesels via roro learned that the hard way
PariaMan wrote:With the increase in the price of diesel fuel and the higher cost of maintaining diesel engines do not see the advantage of diesel over petrol vehicles
screwbash wrote:PariaMan wrote:With the increase in the price of diesel fuel and the higher cost of maintaining diesel engines do not see the advantage of diesel over petrol vehicles
especially when the interior of them vans small just like most cars and van tyres more expensive too. so unless u have a garden planting somewhere where it have dirt tracks buying a van is pointless.
screwbash wrote:PariaMan wrote:With the increase in the price of diesel fuel and the higher cost of maintaining diesel engines do not see the advantage of diesel over petrol vehicles
especially when the interior of them vans small just like most cars and van tyres more expensive too. so unless u have a garden planting somewhere where it have dirt tracks buying a van is pointless.
rspann wrote:Yeah, but Rajments are very small with a car.
PariaMan wrote:With the increase in the price of diesel fuel and the higher cost of maintaining diesel engines do not see the advantage of diesel over petrol vehicles
kamakazi wrote:Same vehicle with the only difference being the engine(diesel and gas), maintenance costs are about equal. Replacing non maintenance components is where it starts to deviate in a big way.PariaMan wrote:With the increase in the price of diesel fuel and the higher cost of maintaining diesel engines do not see the advantage of diesel over petrol vehicles
rspann wrote:These vehicles are what defines Raj and Kwame.
ScHoolboySoloQ wrote:rspann wrote:These vehicles are what defines Raj and Kwame.
Raj does have speaker boxes facing outside with crix pan bass
Kwame does drive drop low, extra dark tint, big crims with HID 10000k
Ali like big van with spaceship fittings, wide tyres, big cables for towing and taking pictures of the mud on the van after every off road trip to impress Farah
rspann wrote:ScHoolboySoloQ wrote:rspann wrote:These vehicles are what defines Raj and Kwame.
Raj does have speaker boxes facing outside with crix pan bass
Kwame does drive drop low, extra dark tint, big crims with HID 10000k
Ali like big van with spaceship fittings, wide tyres, big cables for towing and taking pictures of the mud on the van after every off road trip to impress Farah
Oaaarrr. I hear height is inversely proportional to length , dais true?
Joshie23 wrote:kamakazi wrote:Same vehicle with the only difference being the engine(diesel and gas), maintenance costs are about equal. Replacing non maintenance components is where it starts to deviate in a big way.PariaMan wrote:With the increase in the price of diesel fuel and the higher cost of maintaining diesel engines do not see the advantage of diesel over petrol vehicles
This is not entirely true. I know people may have different definitions of maintenance, but here's an example. There are two Tucsons in my family, both with 2.0L engines, but one gas, one diesel. The diesel takes almost twice as much oil than the gas version. The fuel filter on the diesel is also changed every service or every other service, something that isn't done as regularly on the gas version. These factors will increase the maintenance cost.
I know the thread has been derailed because Tucsons, Hiluxes, etc. aren't luxury vehicles, but the advantage diesel once held in Trinidad is lost except for heavier commercial vehicles.
kamakazi wrote:So did some research and it is more vehicle specific than I thought.
In regards to the hilux; the difference is 1.5 litres more oil and no sparkplugs for the diesel (depending on the oil you buy that could be as low as $50 or more than $200)
BMW like for like, Oil capacity is the same for the 2.0l engines (in gas and diesel)
Mercedes requires a Little less oil in their diesel than the petrol version... If the internet is to be believed (10000km longer change internal as well but that will take a hit with our diesel being burnt).
The Korean twins... Yeah oil capacity for diesel is approaching 2x (5l for gas versus 8l for the diesel)
So it depends.Joshie23 wrote:kamakazi wrote:Same vehicle with the only difference being the engine(diesel and gas), maintenance costs are about equal. Replacing non maintenance components is where it starts to deviate in a big way.PariaMan wrote:With the increase in the price of diesel fuel and the higher cost of maintaining diesel engines do not see the advantage of diesel over petrol vehicles
This is not entirely true. I know people may have different definitions of maintenance, but here's an example. There are two Tucsons in my family, both with 2.0L engines, but one gas, one diesel. The diesel takes almost twice as much oil than the gas version. The fuel filter on the diesel is also changed every service or every other service, something that isn't done as regularly on the gas version. These factors will increase the maintenance cost.
I know the thread has been derailed because Tucsons, Hiluxes, etc. aren't luxury vehicles, but the advantage diesel once held in Trinidad is lost except for heavier commercial vehicles.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: adnj, Google [Bot], ProtonPowder and 201 guests