Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
elec2020 wrote:I wont comment on each of the responses on my post on the devaluation... just note the following:
a). A devaluation is beneficial when import consumption is unsustainable and when exporters have enough profuctive capacities to benefit from the it (exporters goods and services become cheaper in the foreign market when they is a devaluation).
b). prior to covid a devaluation would have benefited tnt as their was obvious signs of mass import consumption as well as cries from the manufacturing sector for support from the government to help them boost their exports (implyig they had space to ramp up production).
c). With covid import consumption still remains high but manufacturers productive capacity has shrunken (as evidenced by plant closures and staff cuts). A devaluation therefore will not bring all of the intended benefits. Additionally, given current economic hardships following the loss of employment over the stay at home order, raising prices of imported goods (which is what will happen with a devaluation) serves to only worsen the ecomomic impact of covid 19.
I hope all points above clear up why a devaluation would have been good before... but now... since the emergence of covid 19... it does not make sense anymore
Advantages of devaluation
1. Exports become cheaper and more competitive to foreign buyers. Therefore, this provides a boost for domestic demand and could lead to job creation in the export sector.
2. Higher level of exports should lead to an improvement in the current account deficit. This is important if the country has a large current account deficit due to a lack of competitiveness.
3. Higher exports and aggregate demand (AD) can lead to higher rates of economic growth.
These all benefit us and makes us a good investment.
Disadvantages of devaluation
1. Is likely to cause inflation because:
Imports more expensive (any imported good or raw material will increase in price)
AD increases causing demand pull inflation.
Firms / exporters have less incentive to cut costs because they can rely on the devaluation to improve competitiveness. The concern is in the long-term devaluation may lead to lower productivity because of the decline in incentives.
This is expected yes, but it also pushes us toward locally made goods and services
2. Reduces the purchasing power of citizens abroad. e.g. more expensive to go on holiday abroad.
Not necessarily a bad thing as citizens will spend that money locally now (hopefully)
3. A large and rapid devaluation may scare off international investors. It makes investors less willing to hold government debt because it is effectively reducing the value of their holdings.
Yes but that's why we do it in small increments, slowly, maybe to 7 to 7.5
4. If consumers have debts, e.g. mortgages in foreign currency – after a devaluation they will see a sharp rise in the cost of their debt repayments. This occurred in Hungary when many had taken out a mortgage in foreign currency.
Doesn't affect most of us, but could affect government's loans
VexXx Dogg wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:^^ How does one measure who more corrupt-
# of corrupttion scandals/# of years in power
Value of corruption per capita??
Some other measure?
I always like to know how does one determine this or is it just feels and totes
Corruption Perception Index?
https://www.transparency.org/en/countri ... and-tobago
I cant find a country score over time, and I don't have time to scrape the data and do a chart to show our CPI over the last n years.
The_Honourable wrote:zoom rader wrote:The NAR was seen as a black party and that's why PNM ppl turned.5onDfloor wrote:Gladiator wrote:wing wrote:Rovin wrote:^^^^ to split d unc votes ? cause we know pnm votes doh get split ...
Most likely , and how come PNM votes don't split? What inspires such loyalty that UNC and others can't match? Even along purely racial lines, why is the UNC vote so vulnerable to being split with third parties?
As Eric Williams said.... put up a crappo for the PNM and they will vote for it. Most base PNM supporters vote along racial lines, UNC people vote for other reasons.... therefore if there is a better prospect that can create change for the better they would vote accordingly.
The PNM base is just pure blind loyalty
Can you explain the PNM loyalist vote in 1986 (33-3)? and if that is too far back for your memory how about 2010 (29-12)?
2015? UNC voters unanimously supports their party sink or sail so what are the other reasons for the UNC voters to stay loyal to their Indian party other than race?
It was also due to vast PNM corruption coming from Francis Prevat , Jonny O, Hugh Francis and the recession.
Had the NAR been a perceive indo party no way in hell they wining in 1986. The afro popular was and is still not mature in their voting and thinking patterns
TT Africans are still lock in to tribal voting.
Raw but truth as usual. PNM not afraid of any indo party because they know the tribal dynamics will play off during elections. What they are afraid of and would not tolerate in any circumstances is a charismatic afro forming a party and getting popular especially among pnm strongholds. That is why PNM targeted Jack Warner from the beginning and now Watson Duke. If Jack didn't do his fifa foolishness, he would have split the PNM vote while he was in UNC or under ILP. If Watson takes Tobago, his party can now come Trinidad and work among the pnm strongholds. Once that happens you will see frothup. You understand why Rowley is uncomfortable and talking stupidness about not forgiving tobago if dey vote Duke?
Penguin wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:Interesting take on marginal constituenciesIn 2002, Ghany designed a formula for the calculation of the outer limit of marginality. The inner limit of marginality will always be zero; but the outer limit is a moving target from election to election. Utilising his formula and applying it to the 2015 election results, constituencies won by a margin of 3,400 votes or less represent (based on the data) marginal constituencies.
As a result, the following are the marginal constituencies for the 2020 general elections:
Barataria/San Juan (540);
Chaguanas East (1,424);
Cumuto/Manzanilla (3,179);
La Horquetta/Talparo (2,822);
Mayaro (2,894);
Moruga/Tableland (533);
Pointe-a-Pierre (1,506);
San Fernando West (3,310);
St Joseph (1,633)
https://wired868.com/2020/07/09/st-jose ... TUQ2sUyeFM
Added in the results:
Barataria/San Juan (540); PP 2010, UNC 2015
Chaguanas East (1,424); PP 2010, UNC 2015
Cumuto/Manzanilla (3,179); PP 2010, UNC 2015
La Horquetta/Talparo (2,822); PP 2010, PNM 2015
Mayaro (2,894); PP 2010, PNM 2015
Moruga/Tableland (533); PP 2010, PNM 2015
Pointe-a-Pierre (1,506); PP 2010, UNC 2015
San Fernando West (3,310); PP 2010, PNM 2015
St Joseph (1,633); PP 2010, PNM 2015
I would add Tunapuna as well as Sangre Grande, though they both definitely slant toward PNM now.
Toco/ Sangre Grande; PP 2010, PNM 2015
Tunapuna; PP 2010, PNM 2015
These are the seats UNC will need to win back, remember they need 3 to win. (18 were won in 2015).
Of these 3, it's possible St Joseph, Moruga/Tableland will go back to UNC. However, I doubt they can win anything else.
That's if PNM can steal or corrupt the elections .EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:If Duke win Tobago then Tobago is fcked.
Rowley will jam a umbrella up they backside
Golden Grove readyredmanjp wrote:7 DAYS TO GET REGISTERED! Wednesday 15th July is the deadline.
zoom rader wrote:The NAR was seen as a black party and that's why PNM ppl turned.5onDfloor wrote:Gladiator wrote:wing wrote:Rovin wrote:^^^^ to split d unc votes ? cause we know pnm votes doh get split ...
Most likely , and how come PNM votes don't split? What inspires such loyalty that UNC and others can't match? Even along purely racial lines, why is the UNC vote so vulnerable to being split with third parties?
As Eric Williams said.... put up a crappo for the PNM and they will vote for it. Most base PNM supporters vote along racial lines, UNC people vote for other reasons.... therefore if there is a better prospect that can create change for the better they would vote accordingly.
The PNM base is just pure blind loyalty
Can you explain the PNM loyalist vote in 1986 (33-3)? and if that is too far back for your memory how about 2010 (29-12)?
2015? UNC voters unanimously supports their party sink or sail so what are the other reasons for the UNC voters to stay loyal to their Indian party other than race?
It was also due to vast PNM corruption coming from Francis Prevat , Jonny O, Hugh Francis and the recession.
Had the NAR been a perceive indo party no way in hell they wining in 1986. The afro popular was and is still not mature in their voting and thinking patterns
TT Africans are still lock in to tribal voting.
What tribal voting?5onDfloor wrote:zoom rader wrote:The NAR was seen as a black party and that's why PNM ppl turned.5onDfloor wrote:Gladiator wrote:wing wrote:Rovin wrote:^^^^ to split d unc votes ? cause we know pnm votes doh get split ...
Most likely , and how come PNM votes don't split? What inspires such loyalty that UNC and others can't match? Even along purely racial lines, why is the UNC vote so vulnerable to being split with third parties?
As Eric Williams said.... put up a crappo for the PNM and they will vote for it. Most base PNM supporters vote along racial lines, UNC people vote for other reasons.... therefore if there is a better prospect that can create change for the better they would vote accordingly.
The PNM base is just pure blind loyalty
Can you explain the PNM loyalist vote in 1986 (33-3)? and if that is too far back for your memory how about 2010 (29-12)?
2015? UNC voters unanimously supports their party sink or sail so what are the other reasons for the UNC voters to stay loyal to their Indian party other than race?
It was also due to vast PNM corruption coming from Francis Prevat , Jonny O, Hugh Francis and the recession.
Had the NAR been a perceive indo party no way in hell they wining in 1986. The afro popular was and is still not mature in their voting and thinking patterns
TT Africans are still lock in to tribal voting.
Care to explain the tribal voting in 2010? U seem to gloss over it.
Dizzy28 wrote:The name speaks for itself though. It a perception index so opinion would count more than facts.
It's the reason the Global Competitive Index administered by ALJGSB moved to version 4 in 2018. To remove the subjectivity inherent in it.VexXx Dogg wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:^^ How does one measure who more corrupt-
# of corrupttion scandals/# of years in power
Value of corruption per capita??
Some other measure?
I always like to know how does one determine this or is it just feels and totes
Corruption Perception Index?
https://www.transparency.org/en/countri ... and-tobago
I cant find a country score over time, and I don't have time to scrape the data and do a chart to show our CPI over the last n years.
shake d livin wake d dead wrote:The_Honourable wrote:zoom rader wrote:The NAR was seen as a black party and that's why PNM ppl turned.5onDfloor wrote:Gladiator wrote:wing wrote:Rovin wrote:^^^^ to split d unc votes ? cause we know pnm votes doh get split ...
Most likely , and how come PNM votes don't split? What inspires such loyalty that UNC and others can't match? Even along purely racial lines, why is the UNC vote so vulnerable to being split with third parties?
As Eric Williams said.... put up a crappo for the PNM and they will vote for it. Most base PNM supporters vote along racial lines, UNC people vote for other reasons.... therefore if there is a better prospect that can create change for the better they would vote accordingly.
The PNM base is just pure blind loyalty
Can you explain the PNM loyalist vote in 1986 (33-3)? and if that is too far back for your memory how about 2010 (29-12)?
2015? UNC voters unanimously supports their party sink or sail so what are the other reasons for the UNC voters to stay loyal to their Indian party other than race?
It was also due to vast PNM corruption coming from Francis Prevat , Jonny O, Hugh Francis and the recession.
Had the NAR been a perceive indo party no way in hell they wining in 1986. The afro popular was and is still not mature in their voting and thinking patterns
TT Africans are still lock in to tribal voting.
Raw but truth as usual. PNM not afraid of any indo party because they know the tribal dynamics will play off during elections. What they are afraid of and would not tolerate in any circumstances is a charismatic afro forming a party and getting popular especially among pnm strongholds. That is why PNM targeted Jack Warner from the beginning and now Watson Duke. If Jack didn't do his fifa foolishness, he would have split the PNM vote while he was in UNC or under ILP. If Watson takes Tobago, his party can now come Trinidad and work among the pnm strongholds. Once that happens you will see frothup. You understand why Rowley is uncomfortable and talking stupidness about not forgiving tobago if dey vote Duke?
I think Duke could take Tobago East...gonna be close in the other seat....just imagine it ends up 20-20-1....who Duke gonna side with????
VexXx Dogg wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:The name speaks for itself though. It a perception index so opinion would count more than facts.
It's the reason the Global Competitive Index administered by ALJGSB moved to version 4 in 2018. To remove the subjectivity inherent in it.VexXx Dogg wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:^^ How does one measure who more corrupt-
# of corrupttion scandals/# of years in power
Value of corruption per capita??
Some other measure?
I always like to know how does one determine this or is it just feels and totes
Corruption Perception Index?
https://www.transparency.org/en/countri ... and-tobago
I cant find a country score over time, and I don't have time to scrape the data and do a chart to show our CPI over the last n years.
The thing is a lot of latent indicators can only be measured by perception. *shrug*
Yup they have closed minds and that is what they instill on their voters.Dizzy28 wrote:Rowley has already said the PNM does not enter into arrangements with other parties when asked about Dukeshake d livin wake d dead wrote:The_Honourable wrote:zoom rader wrote:The NAR was seen as a black party and that's why PNM ppl turned.5onDfloor wrote:Gladiator wrote:wing wrote:Rovin wrote:^^^^ to split d unc votes ? cause we know pnm votes doh get split ...
Most likely , and how come PNM votes don't split? What inspires such loyalty that UNC and others can't match? Even along purely racial lines, why is the UNC vote so vulnerable to being split with third parties?
As Eric Williams said.... put up a crappo for the PNM and they will vote for it. Most base PNM supporters vote along racial lines, UNC people vote for other reasons.... therefore if there is a better prospect that can create change for the better they would vote accordingly.
The PNM base is just pure blind loyalty
Can you explain the PNM loyalist vote in 1986 (33-3)? and if that is too far back for your memory how about 2010 (29-12)?
2015? UNC voters unanimously supports their party sink or sail so what are the other reasons for the UNC voters to stay loyal to their Indian party other than race?
It was also due to vast PNM corruption coming from Francis Prevat , Jonny O, Hugh Francis and the recession.
Had the NAR been a perceive indo party no way in hell they wining in 1986. The afro popular was and is still not mature in their voting and thinking patterns
TT Africans are still lock in to tribal voting.
Raw but truth as usual. PNM not afraid of any indo party because they know the tribal dynamics will play off during elections. What they are afraid of and would not tolerate in any circumstances is a charismatic afro forming a party and getting popular especially among pnm strongholds. That is why PNM targeted Jack Warner from the beginning and now Watson Duke. If Jack didn't do his fifa foolishness, he would have split the PNM vote while he was in UNC or under ILP. If Watson takes Tobago, his party can now come Trinidad and work among the pnm strongholds. Once that happens you will see frothup. You understand why Rowley is uncomfortable and talking stupidness about not forgiving tobago if dey vote Duke?
I think Duke could take Tobago East...gonna be close in the other seat....just imagine it ends up 20-20-1....who Duke gonna side with????
I went to length to explain this a few years ago.EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:The sad thing is, she being in parliament would actually be one of the best things to happen in Trinidad but most people would view her as a lunatic so she won't get any votes.
People still have not gotten over the propaganda spread by America regarding Marijuana being the Devil Plant that sends you mad and worse than cocaine etc
When I was doing my AC and Refrigeration technician course I met a member of the TTPS, oldish African fella still in the force he is a sergeant I believe or is it inspector? anyways regardless I asked him a question regarding Cannabis and why it was illegal at the time Rowley didn't yet pass the law. He responded that it was a result of white colonialism and demonizing of a drug for monetary gains and nothing more. He was in full support of legalizing it and also he was an Atheist but not necessarily a die hard PNM he had voted PP in 2010
He was very well educated in history and science it was always a joy having a conversation with such an educated gentleman, so next time allyuh say 3 cxc passes and make fun of officers remember there are exceptionally intelligent ones in the service.
zoom rader wrote:What tribal voting?5onDfloor wrote:zoom rader wrote:The NAR was seen as a black party and that's why PNM ppl turned.5onDfloor wrote:Gladiator wrote:wing wrote:Rovin wrote:^^^^ to split d unc votes ? cause we know pnm votes doh get split ...
Most likely , and how come PNM votes don't split? What inspires such loyalty that UNC and others can't match? Even along purely racial lines, why is the UNC vote so vulnerable to being split with third parties?
As Eric Williams said.... put up a crappo for the PNM and they will vote for it. Most base PNM supporters vote along racial lines, UNC people vote for other reasons.... therefore if there is a better prospect that can create change for the better they would vote accordingly.
The PNM base is just pure blind loyalty
Can you explain the PNM loyalist vote in 1986 (33-3)? and if that is too far back for your memory how about 2010 (29-12)?
2015? UNC voters unanimously supports their party sink or sail so what are the other reasons for the UNC voters to stay loyal to their Indian party other than race?
It was also due to vast PNM corruption coming from Francis Prevat , Jonny O, Hugh Francis and the recession.
Had the NAR been a perceive indo party no way in hell they wining in 1986. The afro popular was and is still not mature in their voting and thinking patterns
TT Africans are still lock in to tribal voting.
Care to explain the tribal voting in 2010? U seem to gloss over it.
It was a one off accumulations of different parties. No tribal voting there in forming the then goverment
elec2020 wrote:^Oil prices dropped by over 50 per cent in 2015... PNM manufactured that too aint... PNM did not manufacture no crisis in 2015... all net oil exporters were in problems when OPEC tried to compete out shale oil and gas... learn the reasons behind the collapse in economic activity between 2015 and 2019 before making up things... i not fond of PNM's tenure but dont make up things to suit your narrative
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Habit7, jeevdude199, teems1 and 148 guests