Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
bluefete wrote:THERE ARE NO WORDS, TUNERS, NO WORDS!!!
https://www.facebook.com/TheTrio.TT/vid ... 2577161754
shake d livin wake d dead wrote:Imagine you are the head of CARICOM but didnt know India was sending vaccines to CARICOM
And when you can't pay them pay them back they own you. Like they did in Jamaica. A massive size of prime lands was given to them in exchange for the PortHabit7 wrote:Gladiator wrote:How much beg they beg China for money to do useless crap over the decades..... This man is Ignorant, stupid and feel everybody brainless like his supporters.
Beg China for what? China offers countries loans and we have to pay them back, both PNM and UNC take advantage of it.
We are willing to pay India for vaccines and they want to give it away to others, that is their choice.
There is not T&T can do to change India's mind.
sMASH wrote:hmmmn the same people that jamming NGC with high cost off shore gas, putting them at a disadvantage by selling that gas to pt lisas with that high price, are jumping at the chance to UNITIZE. big companies dont take deals to make a loss.
even if that unitization contract extends to the sale of the lng, it would would be a 10% say in that process.
but wait, it ws 10% and 11% in another plant.. so it would end up being like 5 or 6% say in the WHOLEEE complex.
if u was concerned about transfer pricing before, wait till u hear about the the internal diversion of assets around that 5% interest in that complex. u would be like silent partner.
Redman wrote:We all should be concerned with transfer pricing.
But the published statements state that there will be a restructuring.
We have to wait and see what the final terms are and what are the returns.
Some yes no questions that I would like you to answer...
That 6% ish is correct as of now...can you say what the enterprise value will be?
Can you state what the increase in the revenue from sales would be with the new formulas?
Can you state whether there is an agreement to recoup the 300M investment before any other shareholder gets a cent in dividends?
Can you state whether there was consideration for the risk taken on by making the 300M investment-maybe enhanced equity or dividend flow?
Pointing out hypothetical situations in ignorance of facts is just ole talk.
It would be impossible to say good or bad until we know the above answers-based on the certainty of your position, you have that info.
Otherwise your have again concluded solely based on your politics.
shake d livin wake d dead wrote:Making sure allyuh see it twice. Probably fake
Redman wrote:So there is gas?
You and PEAnut been saying there is no gas-now you saying that that excuse went away?
Is there gas or not?
And the point here is that the unitization seeks to solve BP/Shell s ability to direct gas to(away from) a specific train
Redman wrote:No answer?
none?
nothing to add?
just blathering bullchit.
Redman take a rest today, come back tomorrow for some licks nah.Redman wrote:Still nothing.
Is there gas or not?
zoom rader wrote:Redman take a rest today, come back tomorrow for some licks nah.Redman wrote:Still nothing.
Is there gas or not?
I seriously think Redman don't know what TAR stands for.De Dragon wrote:zoom rader wrote:Redman take a rest today, come back tomorrow for some licks nah.Redman wrote:Still nothing.
Is there gas or not?
There is still no gas for Train 1. It's provision was dependent on Jackarse JUHN Scarfy and his band of incompetents ponying up that $300M, and still not a guarantee according to death warmed over looking Guy Smiley who said the TAR was to have T1 in "ready state" for gas.
Colostomy Bag's mastery of dotish is admirable though
Redman wrote:So now it is not an excuse.
So the simple statements by BP Shell and GORTT that committed all to the restructuring of the LNG complex is to what end?
You guys state no gas for train one as if it isn't the primary problem that the restructuring seeks to solve.
You simply do not know.
All the blather redirect,name calling and juvenile tactics don't change that.
sMASH wrote:Unless, u getting gas spuriously like Barbados sending a shipment, u urself said the time line fir gas is 2025.
So hold off till then.
There is no other source that will magically appear in the pipeline.
sMASH wrote:BTW, austerity measures, but more obvious this time.
Screenshot_2021-03-23-08-05-22-600_com.facebook.katana.jpeg
RowlamonicssMASH wrote:Why would u sell ur goods at 35% of the normal prices?
Unless ur seeing real pressure and need some sort of liquidity.
Not even profit, just simple cash.
This economy getting mash up.
Berger had already stopped production locally, opting to just inport and resell
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 131 guests