Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Habit7 wrote:zoom rader wrote:Brace yourself , I hope we don't get a bumper PNM murder rate this weekend.
High five ZR! Your hopes came true.
De Dragon wrote:EmilioA wrote:De Dragon wrote:EmilioA wrote:zoom rader wrote:EmilioA wrote:UNC had 5 years and 3 months to buss the mark on PNM corruption. Calder Hart innocent according to them.
UNC does not run the affairs of the office of the DPP
Perpetual victim mentality. Its always somebody else fault why they couldnt do they job.
So the murder rate is PNM's fault then?
If the PNM was accusing a specific person as being responsible for a number of murders and then didnt prosecute him, yeah they responsible.... Does this absolve the UNC in anyway ?
Is the 200+ murder rate for the year the PNM's fault? Yes or no? No clarifications, no UNC mentions, just a yes or no, because what you type there I don't understand. Is it that there has to be suspects known to the PNM but not prosecuted, which means that all those ghost murders conveniently escape their collective responsibility?
EmilioA wrote:De Dragon wrote:EmilioA wrote:De Dragon wrote:EmilioA wrote:zoom rader wrote:EmilioA wrote:UNC had 5 years and 3 months to buss the mark on PNM corruption. Calder Hart innocent according to them.
UNC does not run the affairs of the office of the DPP
Perpetual victim mentality. Its always somebody else fault why they couldnt do they job.
So the murder rate is PNM's fault then?
If the PNM was accusing a specific person as being responsible for a number of murders and then didnt prosecute him, yeah they responsible.... Does this absolve the UNC in anyway ?
Is the 200+ murder rate for the year the PNM's fault? Yes or no? No clarifications, no UNC mentions, just a yes or no, because what you type there I don't understand. Is it that there has to be suspects known to the PNM but not prosecuted, which means that all those ghost murders conveniently escape their collective responsibility?
I answered you question, doh twist yourself becuase you dont like the answer. I talking about Calder Hart corruption. Which murderer you talking about ?
De Dragon wrote:EmilioA wrote:De Dragon wrote:EmilioA wrote:De Dragon wrote:EmilioA wrote:zoom rader wrote:EmilioA wrote:UNC had 5 years and 3 months to buss the mark on PNM corruption. Calder Hart innocent according to them.
UNC does not run the affairs of the office of the DPP
Perpetual victim mentality. Its always somebody else fault why they couldnt do they job.
So the murder rate is PNM's fault then?
If the PNM was accusing a specific person as being responsible for a number of murders and then didnt prosecute him, yeah they responsible.... Does this absolve the UNC in anyway ?
Is the 200+ murder rate for the year the PNM's fault? Yes or no? No clarifications, no UNC mentions, just a yes or no, because what you type there I don't understand. Is it that there has to be suspects known to the PNM but not prosecuted, which means that all those ghost murders conveniently escape their collective responsibility?
I answered you question, doh twist yourself becuase you dont like the answer. I talking about Calder Hart corruption. Which murderer you talking about ?
Still not saying yes or no..........
because what you type there I don't understand.
Cooloh wrote:The media just reporting the news
EmilioA wrote:De Dragon wrote:EmilioA wrote:De Dragon wrote:EmilioA wrote:De Dragon wrote:EmilioA wrote:zoom rader wrote:
UNC does not run the affairs of the office of the DPP
Perpetual victim mentality. Its always somebody else fault why they couldnt do they job.
So the murder rate is PNM's fault then?
If the PNM was accusing a specific person as being responsible for a number of murders and then didnt prosecute him, yeah they responsible.... Does this absolve the UNC in anyway ?
Is the 200+ murder rate for the year the PNM's fault? Yes or no? No clarifications, no UNC mentions, just a yes or no, because what you type there I don't understand. Is it that there has to be suspects known to the PNM but not prosecuted, which means that all those ghost murders conveniently escape their collective responsibility?
I answered you question, doh twist yourself becuase you dont like the answer. I talking about Calder Hart corruption. Which murderer you talking about ?
Still not saying yes or no..........because what you type there I don't understand.
Well if you have trouble with English I cant really help you.
De Dragon wrote:Says the person who cannot comprehend what a yes or no type question entails
EmilioA wrote:De Dragon wrote:Says the person who cannot comprehend what a yes or no type question entails
if you are actually an intelligent adult then you will know that in real life, very often both Yes and No are false answers becuase they each leave out half the facts.
De Dragon wrote:EmilioA wrote:De Dragon wrote:Says the person who cannot comprehend what a yes or no type question entails
if you are actually an intelligent adult then you will know that in real life, very often both Yes and No are false answers becuase they each leave out half the facts.
Yes, but also when the respondent is reluctant/unwilling to give a straight answer that might make the party he has chosen to support look inept and clueless, and chooses to hide behind vague and meaningless drivel, then yes and no are perfectly acceptable, but only to them.
You and your clique, like your ineffectual PNM Government, should not always seek to "trap and pass", but try to man up and take responsibility for the crime rate. Did you all think that governing was only about golf, new Benzes and jetting off to weddings? Did you think that being "in charge" was only about getting your face in the newspaper and on TV? No, governing is about these things, that while mundane and irrelevant to those with bodyguard details, have the rest of us always looking our our shoulders.
In short, don't slip on your facking tears on your way to actually fixing the problem or providing some little relief to the people who pay you. Toodles!
EmilioA wrote:De Dragon wrote:EmilioA wrote:De Dragon wrote:Says the person who cannot comprehend what a yes or no type question entails
if you are actually an intelligent adult then you will know that in real life, very often both Yes and No are false answers becuase they each leave out half the facts.
Yes, but also when the respondent is reluctant/unwilling to give a straight answer that might make the party he has chosen to support look inept and clueless, and chooses to hide behind vague and meaningless drivel, then yes and no are perfectly acceptable, but only to them.
You and your clique, like your ineffectual PNM Government, should not always seek to "trap and pass", but try to man up and take responsibility for the crime rate. Did you all think that governing was only about golf, new Benzes and jetting off to weddings? Did you think that being "in charge" was only about getting your face in the newspaper and on TV? No, governing is about these things, that while mundane and irrelevant to those with bodyguard details, have the rest of us always looking our our shoulders.
In short, don't slip on your facking tears on your way to actually fixing the problem or providing some little relief to the people who pay you. Toodles!
Unfortunately for your little tirade, I have voted UNC/COP all my life and am a card carrying UNC member .
Can you say the same ?
But I am also fully aware that the PNM is doing the best they can, given the limitations set by the true power brokers in Trinidad. The UNC (what is left of it) by contrast would be in full collaboration mode.
But its good that you are honest and have shown that you can only view disagreement through the lens of politics. Go ahead blame the PNM for everything . Right now they're all that's standing between you and the Latin cartel/Chinese mafia.
The UNC has been reduced to the Cult of Kamla and I would not wish to see that crew back in power.
A thought to consider. What if fewer murders under the UNC meant that more drugs were flowing through the ports ?
Rory Phoulorie wrote:Some machinations going on in a state enterprise that make the newspapers this week. But I hear they about to clean house again. First they got rid of the corrupt PP people, now they have to get rid of their own who, allegedly, not dealing straight up.
zoom rader wrote:Habit7 wrote:zoom rader wrote:Brace yourself , I hope we don't get a bumper PNM murder rate this weekend.
High five ZR! Your hopes came true.
Jah bless, lifes saved .
I notice that when we have injun holidays we have a major drop in crime, anything outside that its level crime.
We should have more injun holidays to pacify our violent citizens ie them gang members.
desifemlove wrote:zoom rader wrote:Habit7 wrote:zoom rader wrote:Brace yourself , I hope we don't get a bumper PNM murder rate this weekend.
High five ZR! Your hopes came true.
Jah bless, lifes saved .
I notice that when we have injun holidays we have a major drop in crime, anything outside that its level crime.
We should have more injun holidays to pacify our violent citizens ie them gang members.
cos we gonna see a spike on Emancipation Day, ent?
do you have stats to prove that crime is racially-based?
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Duane 3NE 2NR, Google [Bot] and 95 guests