Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
AbstractPoetic wrote:Miktay wrote:AbstractPoetic wrote:Another silent audience on Bill O'Reilly sexual predator behavior? Let's see who has the audacity to defend this behavior.
Background Information: O'Reilly has apparently sexually and verbally harassed a number of women, either former Fox employees or contributors on his show. Fox settled with several of these women (to the tune of $13 million) in exchange for their silence, but the cover up has come to light.
Fox News is owned by 21st Century Fox, which is owned by Rupert Murdoch. Murdoch is defending O'Reilly because his show pulls upward of $446 million in ads.
Since the revelation, Mercedes Benz, BMW and Hyundai have pulled their ads.
Allegations are not proof.
In any case Amerika iz supposed to rely on the presumption of innocence. But perhaps thiz human right has been thrown out the window if accuseds are now going to be tried in the liberal mass media.
I just knew this would have come up.
It's not an allegation when O'Reilly and Fox *SETTLED* with their accusers. Do you know the meaning of a legal settlement??
Ugh.
EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:Then if she claims to have the phone calls recorded she should have released it for us to hear, until then she is another lying tramp looking for money. Your dignity is worth more than money after all right?
With that said its your choice not to view his program, however
http://www.thewrap.com/only-walking-dea ... l-oreilly/
O Reilly factor is beaten only by The Walking Dead on Cable TV, they have been trying for over a decade to take away his spot as number 1 show on Cable TV news for 17 years unbroken and counting and have always failed even with false allegations of rape etc
In video games we call this an immortal streak when you hit 15X, so O Reilly is on his 3rd Immortal Streak as we speak, the first person to break his streak at this point will be considered legendary. Unfortunately for liberals the only person likely to break this record is Tucker Carlson.
AbstractPoetic wrote:And the list of advertisers that have jumped ship continue to pile up:
GlaxoSmithKline (Flonase allergy spray, Breathe Right nasal strips and Biotene mouthwash brands)
Allstate
Constant Contact, an online marketer;
Untuckit, a men’s clothing distributor;
Sanofi Consumer HealthCare, which advertisesproducts like ACT mouthwash
Anyone who can endorse the blatant sexual and unwanted advances of a man towards a woman employee is also complete filth.
AbstractPoetic wrote:20 advertisers and counting have dropped O'Reilly.
When Google acquired YouTube in 2006 for $1.65 billion, it was considered a pricey gamble, one made with the belief that an online service known for pirated videos and vapid user-generated content could appeal to major advertisers.
The bet paid off. YouTube is now one of the pillars of Google’s advertising business and the most valuable video platform on the internet. In recent years, advertisers, unable to ignore its massive audience, flocked to YouTube to reach younger people who have started to shun traditional broadcast television.
But the technology underpinning YouTube’s advertising business has come under intense scrutiny in recent days, with AT&T, Johnson & Johnson and other deep-pocketed marketers announcing that they would pull their ads from the service. Their reason: The automated system in which ads are bought and placed online has too often resulted in brands appearing next to offensive material on YouTube such as hate speech.
Redman wrote:AbstractPoetic wrote:And the list of advertisers that have jumped ship continue to pile up:
GlaxoSmithKline (Flonase allergy spray, Breathe Right nasal strips and Biotene mouthwash brands)
Allstate
Constant Contact, an online marketer;
Untuckit, a men’s clothing distributor;
Sanofi Consumer HealthCare, which advertisesproducts like ACT mouthwash
Anyone who can endorse the blatant sexual and unwanted advances of a man towards a woman employee is also complete filth.
Like Hillary swallowed Bill settling Monica and Paula Jones?
Filth like that?
Redman wrote:Both were accusations
both settled
yet it was ok for Bill C
but O Reilly is guilty
Settlement is not guilt
One if filth but the other is fine.
If you cant see the hypocrisy then thats ok too.
carry on
AbstractPoetic wrote:Redman wrote:Both were accusations
both settled
yet it was ok for Bill C
but O Reilly is guilty
Settlement is not guilt
One if filth but the other is fine.
If you cant see the hypocrisy then thats ok too.
carry on
And please show me where I have endorsed Bill Clinton's predatory behavior?
Yeah, I will wait.
AbstractPoetic wrote:Redman wrote:Both were accusations
both settled
yet it was ok for Bill C
but O Reilly is guilty
Settlement is not guilt
One if filth but the other is fine.
If you cant see the hypocrisy then thats ok too.
carry on
And please show me where I have endorsed Bill Clinton's predatory behavior?
Yeah, I will wait.
EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:AbstractPoetic wrote:Redman wrote:Both were accusations
both settled
yet it was ok for Bill C
but O Reilly is guilty
Settlement is not guilt
One if filth but the other is fine.
If you cant see the hypocrisy then thats ok too.
carry on
And please show me where I have endorsed Bill Clinton's predatory behavior?
Yeah, I will wait.
You voted and supported Hillary 100%, when it was common knowledge that she supported Bill Clinton's sexual predatory behavior aswell as defended a rapist.
But a couple Tramps who claimed how Bill O reilly asked them for a bull so she want millions because of that, you seem to have a really big issue with that, but you didn't seem to have any issue whatsoever with a woman who defended a man and continued to remain married to a man who deep throat monica lewinsky daily like Rocco vs Monica Sweetheart.
Fun Fact, Bill O Reilly has been giving away all his money 100% of it to Charity that he makes from all of his books and on his website. And he has been doing this more than a decade now and he does not accept money from anyone for his charity. He is likely the only person on earth who runs a 100% corrupt free charity. He has donated over a million dollars to the Hatian health foundation over the years.
All that just makes him a charitable alleged sexual assaulter, who got caught and had to have his network cough up some millions because of his ratings.
Redman wrote:AbstractPoetic wrote:Redman wrote:Both were accusations
both settled
yet it was ok for Bill C
but O Reilly is guilty
Settlement is not guilt
One if filth but the other is fine.
If you cant see the hypocrisy then thats ok too.
carry on
And please show me where I have endorsed Bill Clinton's predatory behavior?
Yeah, I will wait.
show me where i said you did.
President Donald Trump on Wednesday weighed in on the recent controversy surrounding Fox News host Bill O'Reilly.
In an interview with The New York Times, Trump defended O'Reilly against new revelations that he, Fox News and parent company 21st Century Fox had paid a total of $13 million in settlements to five women who accused him of sexual harassment or verbal abuse.
"I think he's a person I know well — he is a good person," Trump told the Times. "I think he shouldn't have settled; personally I think he shouldn't have settled. Because you should have taken it all the way. I don't think Bill did anything wrong."
O'Reilly has denied the merits of all the claims against him, 21st Century Fox said in a statement.
Trump similarly defended former Fox News chief Roger Ailes last year, when Ailes was facing a litany of sexual harassment allegations.
"I think they are unfounded just based on what I've read," Trump said of the accusations against Ailes. "Totally unfounded, based on what I read."
Ailes, who has denied all of the allegations against him, was forced to resign from Fox News just one week after that interview.
Redman wrote:again I never mentioned you...
but feel free to wear the cap....
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Duane 3NE 2NR, Google [Bot], pugboy and 202 guests