Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Miktay wrote:
Im surprised ppl still getting ketch in T&T: the land of smartmen.
snypaz wrote:I just wanna say this, if y'all going to take action and rightfully so, don't make the individual aware please. Chances are he might just leave without returning. No I don't have money involved in this. But that's just common sense. Why am I seeing laid out plans of attack on social media? Which also mentions this platform as a way of exposing said individual?
pugboy wrote:so imarkets and all them thing is a breeding school for these bandits then
Oye yuh want some coffeerspann wrote:Look you say the same thing I was asking."are we all so stupid to believe....." Wouldn't some research and due diligence have averted this? I'm just asking because I'm now hearing all the details. Many people have come to me to invest in all kinds of schemes but they are just that, schemes. I invest my own money and make more than any of them.
rspann wrote:Look you say the same thing I was asking."are we all so stupid to believe....." Wouldn't some research and due diligence have averted this? I'm just asking because I'm now hearing all the details. Many people have come to me to invest in all kinds of schemes but they are just that, schemes. I invest my own money and make more than any of them.
Redman wrote:None of us here can say we never get take...in some way.
Money is an emotive thing...and we all are susceptible to scams if someone has the right approach.
Sanford and Madoff fooled some of the best minds in the business.....cus they had the right approach.
Mercenary wrote:amarah u sound so fond of Rosee
Redman wrote:
Get Rich Quick schemes are everywhere. None of us here can say we never get take, in some way.
You could spot bs from a distance . Not everybody out here have that skill. I sorry for the honest people that get caught up in this.rspann wrote:Look you say the same thing I was asking."are we all so stupid to believe....." Wouldn't some research and due diligence have averted this? I'm just asking because I'm now hearing all the details. Many people have come to me to invest in all kinds of schemes but they are just that, schemes. I invest my own money and make more than any of them.
Redman wrote:Some where in the docs that were signed might be acceptance of the risks associated with the type of trading RCL was doing.
This isn't kindergarten....
Every new account doc that I've seen comes with boiler plate language that the client signs ...
Without sight of the documentation my assumption s are...
If he was trading for their account but required authorization for each trade...its the clients responsible for the final decision.
He can't predict the markets
If he had discretion.... Then they would sign over the liability as well.
The account is held outside TnT in a jurisdiction that recognises that only sophisticated investors trade aggressively and can afford to lose 100%.
There are spots where the client will sign attesting to their experience in investing and acknowledges risks of loss.
Caveat Emptor.
If the account was in his name...then its his money to lose.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 218 guests