Flow
Flow
TriniTuner.com  |  Latest Event:  

Forums

AEM FIC VS E-MANAGE ULTIMATE

Tuning advice, problems and troubleshooting

Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods

godd
Ricer
Posts: 17
Joined: September 6th, 2007, 5:51 am
Location: rio claro

AEM FIC VS E-MANAGE ULTIMATE

Postby godd » June 7th, 2010, 1:05 am

find out for a partner he turbo his sr20de and he looking to use a piggyback on the stock brain so he want to know which one is better to use?????????????????

godd
Ricer
Posts: 17
Joined: September 6th, 2007, 5:51 am
Location: rio claro

Re: AEM FIC VS E-MANAGE ULTIMATE

Postby godd » June 7th, 2010, 1:06 am

bump bump

User avatar
bushwakka
punchin NOS
Posts: 4353
Joined: August 24th, 2007, 1:02 pm
Location: GPS unavailable

Re: AEM FIC VS E-MANAGE ULTIMATE

Postby bushwakka » June 7th, 2010, 2:21 pm

e-manage ultimate....i have one to sell too...with universal harness....pm if interested

godd
Ricer
Posts: 17
Joined: September 6th, 2007, 5:51 am
Location: rio claro

Re: AEM FIC VS E-MANAGE ULTIMATE

Postby godd » June 7th, 2010, 3:33 pm

bump come on way all the sr people

User avatar
MJ
3NE 2NR for life
Posts: 151
Joined: June 20th, 2007, 3:50 pm
Location: Chaguanas
Contact:

Re: AEM FIC VS E-MANAGE ULTIMATE

Postby MJ » June 7th, 2010, 5:31 pm

bushwakka wrote:e-manage ultimate....i have one to sell too...with universal harness....pm if interested

X2 cant go wrong

godd
Ricer
Posts: 17
Joined: September 6th, 2007, 5:51 am
Location: rio claro

Re: AEM FIC VS E-MANAGE ULTIMATE

Postby godd » June 7th, 2010, 10:44 pm

bump bump

godd
Ricer
Posts: 17
Joined: September 6th, 2007, 5:51 am
Location: rio claro

Re: AEM FIC VS E-MANAGE ULTIMATE

Postby godd » June 8th, 2010, 10:09 am

bump bump

GameOver
3NE 2NR for life
Posts: 116
Joined: September 10th, 2004, 3:25 pm
Location: Morvant.. the good part

Re: AEM FIC VS E-MANAGE ULTIMATE

Postby GameOver » June 8th, 2010, 6:48 pm

I have been always interested in the FIC. Actually bought one but never installed and due to unfortunate situations subsequently sold it. I am ready to resume my project and thinking of purchasing it again. There are persons on the forum who have installed (a white b14 that was FS some time ago) and i have questioned and heard others metion it for the sr application but they "refused" to offer advice.. U might be on your own if you go the FIC way. The AEM forum has a couple threads addressing it but none complete last time i checked. Better off with the more popular Ultimate...

godd
Ricer
Posts: 17
Joined: September 6th, 2007, 5:51 am
Location: rio claro

Re: AEM FIC VS E-MANAGE ULTIMATE

Postby godd » June 9th, 2010, 11:35 am

yea i have been checking and no one wants to give advise on the fic but i will still really like to know

User avatar
sentraman
Riding on 17's
Posts: 1311
Joined: May 12th, 2003, 11:21 am
Location: In meh Beef or teen

Re: AEM FIC VS E-MANAGE ULTIMATE

Postby sentraman » June 11th, 2010, 10:57 am

I was also looking into getting one but i could not find any info on it and decided to go with the popular Ultimate.

godd
Ricer
Posts: 17
Joined: September 6th, 2007, 5:51 am
Location: rio claro

Re: AEM FIC VS E-MANAGE ULTIMATE

Postby godd » June 11th, 2010, 11:53 pm

bumpbump

ng357
3NE 2NR for life
Posts: 232
Joined: August 15th, 2010, 5:32 pm

Re: AEM FIC VS E-MANAGE ULTIMATE

Postby ng357 » November 26th, 2010, 3:28 am

where cud i buy a emanage ultimate ????

godd
Ricer
Posts: 17
Joined: September 6th, 2007, 5:51 am
Location: rio claro

Re: AEM FIC VS E-MANAGE ULTIMATE

Postby godd » November 26th, 2010, 7:31 am


User avatar
fras
Chronic 2NR
Posts: 2171
Joined: August 25th, 2005, 8:34 pm
Location: Penal

Re: AEM FIC VS E-MANAGE ULTIMATE

Postby fras » November 26th, 2010, 9:11 am

A better comparison would be AEM FIC and Greddy E-Manage Blue... The E-Manage Ultimate in a different class!
Last edited by fras on November 27th, 2010, 1:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
haydn28
Riding on 17's
Posts: 1560
Joined: October 8th, 2008, 5:58 pm
Contact:

Re: AEM FIC VS E-MANAGE ULTIMATE

Postby haydn28 » November 26th, 2010, 12:18 pm

emanage blue is still better than the fic , read the write up on both .

User avatar
xtech
punchin NOS
Posts: 3003
Joined: March 15th, 2006, 2:01 pm
Contact:

Re: AEM FIC VS E-MANAGE ULTIMATE

Postby xtech » November 27th, 2010, 12:05 pm

i think FIC is actually better than the Blue an just below the ultimate in features.

an just like the first fellas who get the emange to work the AEM guys hoarding info too

the FIC has everything out of the box for turbo apps is new tech an has a regular USB cable connection.

i have a FIC forsale and a Blue

User avatar
haydn28
Riding on 17's
Posts: 1560
Joined: October 8th, 2008, 5:58 pm
Contact:

Re: AEM FIC VS E-MANAGE ULTIMATE

Postby haydn28 » November 28th, 2010, 9:46 am

a good thing to note on tuner/forums is that the advice u are getting comes from both reliable sources and hacks

GameOver
3NE 2NR for life
Posts: 116
Joined: September 10th, 2004, 3:25 pm
Location: Morvant.. the good part

Re: AEM FIC VS E-MANAGE ULTIMATE

Postby GameOver » November 28th, 2010, 11:26 am

The FIC is unquestionably better than the Blue IN MY OPINION based on my research of the two, but the op should do some research of his own and compare the options available on both units to derive his own conclusion.
3NE2NR is no encyclopedia and though alot of feedback may be accurate a great amount is also based on personal experiences. This is largely affected by application, expectations and user competence...

User avatar
fras
Chronic 2NR
Posts: 2171
Joined: August 25th, 2005, 8:34 pm
Location: Penal

Re: AEM FIC VS E-MANAGE ULTIMATE

Postby fras » November 30th, 2010, 8:18 pm

xtech what car/engine u had those installed on?

User avatar
xtech
punchin NOS
Posts: 3003
Joined: March 15th, 2006, 2:01 pm
Contact:

Re: AEM FIC VS E-MANAGE ULTIMATE

Postby xtech » December 1st, 2010, 1:03 am

6A13TT ............. 5E-FHTE.............FE3

User avatar
fras
Chronic 2NR
Posts: 2171
Joined: August 25th, 2005, 8:34 pm
Location: Penal

Re: AEM FIC VS E-MANAGE ULTIMATE

Postby fras » December 1st, 2010, 10:32 am

Ok I'm thinking about buying a piggy back early next year... 4G93T

I like the datalog feature of the FIC... Its just plug and play unlike the Greddy?

User avatar
fras
Chronic 2NR
Posts: 2171
Joined: August 25th, 2005, 8:34 pm
Location: Penal

Re: AEM FIC VS E-MANAGE ULTIMATE

Postby fras » December 2nd, 2010, 4:51 pm

Let’s start with the old reliable, GReddy E-manage. The E-manage is pretty simple and has been around for quite some time. It was proven to work pretty well on OBD1 cars, and mediocre success on OBD2. The unit is still loved by many, but with all of the sophisticated OBD2 inter-workings, this unit lacks quite a bit! The unit is controlled and programmed through jumper settings, rotary settings and the software package called the ‘Support Tool’. Through the use of these 3 things, the unit now knows what it is running on (vehicle wise). It knows if it is wasted spark, how many cylinders, VTEC etc.

The Support Tool software for the E-manage is ‘ok’ at best and has some issues if not updated, using a serial to USB connector, using Vista and it happens to rain (joke). This can pose some issues for the end user or tuner who did not have prior knowledge into the problematic software. Once, you are all set, it is rather easy to control and manipulate.

The Support Tool is really what makes the E-manage shine in my honest opinion. It is an “optional” unit, but is essential to programming the unit. The average street price of the Support Tool is around $100. It allows for injector correction factor with ease (input the old and new size and your done!), has a general ‘Air Flow’ map, which is a decent way to add or subtract fuel based upon throttle position, and the other map that may help in some situations, is a MAP clamp option. That is also available in the ‘main harness,’ which is included with the E-manage unit, which you could buy at an average street price of $300. So let’s recap what we just spent to get to where we are now:

E-manage unit $300 (includes main harness)
Support Tool $100 (allows for programming of the E-manage)

Let’s say we want to directly add injector duty cycle to these larger injectors instead of skewing the MAP or MAF sensor in the car. We need the GReddy Injector harness, which street values at around $40. This now allows us to add duty cycle or pulse width to the injectors, but we are still working off of throttle position, which we all know on a turbo car makes for a sloppy tune. The manifold pressure or speed density tuning is where it’s at! Nothing compares to tuning off of boost, to allow for serious correction based upon manifold pressure. Wait!!!! That requires the GReddy Pressure Sensor, which is around $100 street price (adds that to the list) and now we need to connect that sensor to the E-manage and must purchase the Pressure Sensor Harness, which is another $40. Back to the math here:

E-manage unit $300 (includes main harness)
Support Tool $100 (allows for programming of the E-manage)
Injector harness $40 (add duty cycle directly to the injectors)
Pressure Sensor $100 (allow for speed density tuning)
Pressure Sensor harness $40 (allows for pressure sensor to connect to unit)
GRAND TOTAL SPENT THUS far: $580

“Now wait just a cotton-picking minute here! You mean to tell me I have to spend $580 just to get this thing to where I can get CLOSE to done and ready to accommodate my N/A car to Turbo, which I already spent $5K on?” The answer simply is: “yes”, and we are not done yet Dorothy. We have not even addressed the ignition side of the deal yet. Turbo cars are far more prone to detonation due to increased charge temps due to the turbocharger. This is a lot of stress on your intercooler to cool these temps to make them more compressed, cold and condensed and less prone to detonate.

Let’s all remember we are not living in a perfect world, and snap back to reality, because the truth of the matter lies in the fact that the turbo car will detonate and the ignition portion of tuning should not be overlooked, so it looks like we are going to add another $40 to the mix for that “Optional Ignition Harness”. Back to the math once again:
E-manage unit $300 (includes main harness)
Support Tool $100 (allows for programming of the E-manage)
Injector harness $40 (add duty cycle directly to the injectors)
Pressure Sensor $100 (allow for speed density tuning)
Pressure Sensor harness $40 (allows for pressure sensor to connect to unit)
Ignition harness $40 (allows for control of ignition timing)
GRAND TOTAL SPENT THUS far: $620

Now we are cooking with fire!!! So let’s get down to tuning. Ok, so we are with this $620 E-manage and we are ready to tune. The airflow is rather useless for me. The so-called ‘optional’ stuff is the most beneficial and it is still rather useless in some cases. With respect to duty cycle on the injection map, you can ONLY raise it. You can not lower the fuel delivery, which in some cases is a hindrance. For example, I added a new Walbro 255 pump and now because the stock pump was falling off so much on the top end, for me to be at 0 change in pulse width is too much fuel. Bummers!!!

With respect to the ignition control, it’s a joke! It kind of works part of time (like a DSM; LOL) I had our Snap-On MT2500 hooked in to monitor fuel trims and ignition timing, only to find out that when I was tuning and I added timing, it stayed the same according to the Snap-On unit. Then, when I retarded timing, it worked 90% of the time. How’s that for accuracy???

Now for the real kicker! Since the OBD2 inception back in late 1995, there are a lot of sneaky ECU games happening and the players, such as Toyota and Honda, have become even sneakier in the past 5-7 years. More vehicles are now coming equipped with a hybrid wideband primary oxygen sensor, which is VERY hard to fool. It is providing the stock ECU with extremely accurate data and allowing it to make corrections on your car in closed-loop operation. This makes for one tough cookie to crack with respect to piggyback ECUs like the E-manage. The primary oxygen sensor plays a sophisticated spy game that the E-manage are unaware of. Why? Because the E-manage does not connect to the primary oxygen sensor at all. It has no idea the thing even exists!!! So when you are in closed loop, which on some cars I have encountered is less than 4500 RPMS and less than 85% throttle, you’re being corrected by that oxygen sensor. Well what can we do to combat this, but not spend $2K on a standalone?

The AEM FIC may quite possibly be the solution here of the millennium with respect to piggybacks and comprehensive nature. It can control fuel, retard ignition, variable MAP/MAF voltage clamp, VTEC control and O2 sensor skew. It’s quite frankly a watered down AEM EMS at a great price of approximately $400 on the street.

The fuel control is not as user friendly as the E-manage, but allows for much more precise control in my opinion. It allows the user to fully add or take away fuel all in one map. You do have manually calculate how much fuel you want to pull out instead of doing it the old before and after way like the E-manage, but the FIC’s way allows for more tweaking and fine tuning due to the fact that you can take out 43% for those larger injectors to get to a 14.7:1 or 44% or 42%. So the additional control is there! It is not just a broad stroke like the E-manage.

The FIC also comes with an on-board MAP sensor that allows for tuning based off of it. It reads in absolute pressure, which takes into account all sides of manifold pressure. With using it’s tools to the fullest potential, the most simplistic way to tune this unit on a car like the tC would be to clamp the MAF using a variable clamp in the MAF tables, then using the fuel map and on-board pressure sensor to control all fuel in positive manifold pressure (boost). ☺ This seems to work the best (if done properly). Of course if you can get away with getting the results you need with using minimal maps and functions inside the FIC, please do so.

The FIC also comes equipped with an O2 sensor skewing option, to help retain your maps versus that pesky wideband O2 and the stock ECU. This is truly a huge step in the piggyback realm (and long overdue quite frankly). I am not saying no one has ever come to the market with an O2 skewing piggyback before, because companies like Split Second, PCS and a few others have paved that route, but lacked control, precision and/or ignition control as well. So what does this mean to the end user? That means NO ECU RELEARNING!!! As a word to the wise, make sure you have a hand-held scan tool handy to monitor your fuel trims and set that skewer up properly. It can tricky and ugly quickly for sure if you’re not monitoring those trims.

Lastly, the real awesome benefit of the FIC lies with the ability to retard timing on those boosted applications. The way that the FIC does this is truly like its older brother, the EMS, in the fact that it does it through the crank sensor, and not altering signals going to each and every coil pack, which can become inconsistent like the E-manage does. So this method is truly innovative and long overdue in the piggyback realm as well.

In conclusion, the AEM FIC is the true and best choice for your buck with respect to piggyback engine managements. Do not be confused, it is still a piggyback, and a REAL standalone should be considered for those high dollar, high HP goals. For the guy looking to have a little more fun on the weekend and add 100whp to their Civic, tC or whatever it may be, the AEM FIC is the definitive choice. Lastly, there is a new software release for the FIC, which allows you to datalog an AEM UEGO, which can come in incredibly handy on those street tuning or dyno tuning sessions.

http://www.honda-tech.com/showthread.php?t=2286303

User avatar
megadoc1
punchin NOS
Posts: 3261
Joined: January 9th, 2006, 7:33 pm
Location: advancing the kingdom of heaven

Re: AEM FIC VS E-MANAGE ULTIMATE

Postby megadoc1 » December 5th, 2010, 7:18 pm

currently I have a fic installed on a ga16de, its the same
wiring as the sr
I can retard timing ,add or reduce fuel delivery
and run a map base tune with the built in map sensor (good for retarding on boost)
easy to install
the only problem I had was the wiring pins in the jack slipping out of place
but that an be solved with silicon

User avatar
xtech
punchin NOS
Posts: 3003
Joined: March 15th, 2006, 2:01 pm
Contact:

Re: AEM FIC VS E-MANAGE ULTIMATE

Postby xtech » December 5th, 2010, 7:54 pm

Plus u can have 2 maps as well stored in the AEM FIC an tune one map for pump gas an at the flip of a switch u can run a race gas MAP for high boost it also has larger maps Each map is 21X17 vs 17x17 in the GReedy's

User avatar
megadoc1
punchin NOS
Posts: 3261
Joined: January 9th, 2006, 7:33 pm
Location: advancing the kingdom of heaven

Re: AEM FIC VS E-MANAGE ULTIMATE

Postby megadoc1 » December 6th, 2010, 7:50 pm

I didnt know about the two maps , thanks for that info
will look into it

Advertisement

Return to “AUTOMOTIVE TECH”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests