Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
NR8 wrote:Who is the local distributor for Purolator btw?
NR8 wrote:Thanks intelMAX.
What are your views on the Luberfiner brand of oil filters guys? Been using them for about 2 years without problems.
hindian wrote:What about the K&N brand of oil filters? Anybody had experience with those? I understand they have a longer service period somewhere around 10k miles or so...
toyolink wrote:I am observing a couple of filter bursted open on this thread and really cannot figure out much.
The question I would like answered is apart from the obvious (paper vs more durable looking material),how can anyone determine the efficiency of any of the products being pronounced upon.
What is the physical durability of the internal filter membrance in terms of continuous filtration operations under high operating temps and our love locally to run heavy viscosity oils like 20w-50 etc.
It appears to me that most people are just going on gut instinct and this cannot be a prudent approach to asset protection.
cinco wrote:toyolink wrote:I am observing a couple of filter bursted open on this thread and really cannot figure out much.
The question I would like answered is apart from the obvious (paper vs more durable looking material),how can anyone determine the efficiency of any of the products being pronounced upon.
What is the physical durability of the internal filter membrance in terms of continuous filtration operations under high operating temps and our love locally to run heavy viscosity oils like 20w-50 etc.
It appears to me that most people are just going on gut instinct and this cannot be a prudent approach to asset protection.
there is no need for anything more than that basically.
i use purolater or luberfiner filters if i cant get oem basically.
in my experience the fram filter casing is even weaker than the purolater/luberfiner the internal membrane looks cheaper and things like a less pronounced anti drainback valve and oil bypass using simple mechanical understanding is what i go by.
which is basically my "gut instinct"
when a purolater filter is 20-25 dollars as opposed to same or more for a fram filter its more than enough for me to stick with the puro.
And well when i buy my amsoil i get a free luberfiner filter from big z
toyolink wrote:I am observing a couple of filter bursted open on this thread and really cannot figure out much.
The question I would like answered is apart from the obvious (paper vs more durable looking material),how can anyone determine the efficiency of any of the products being pronounced upon.
What is the physical durability of the internal filter membrance in terms of continuous filtration operations under high operating temps and our love locally to run heavy viscosity oils like 20w-50 etc.
It appears to me that most people are just going on gut instinct and this cannot be a prudent approach to asset protection.
Hook wrote:I think he's saying that there's nothing scientific about "I've used x filter with no problems" testimonials when you've no real evidence that it's doing what the manufacturer claims other than a seat-of-the-pants judgment call, so he'd rather protect his investment with a top brand filter rather than squabble over which bargain brand is better.
Hook wrote:Naw, I'm certain I typed "squabble".
To date there aren't any locally done flow or filtration tests done on the locally available filters with locally available oils that I'm aware of. So we're just guessing which cheap filters are better, sometimes based on an online comparison.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest