Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
TriniGT wrote:Shouldn't a GT42 push something like upwards of 700HP? For that kinda of power and better response a GT3076R or a GT35R is recommended, faster spool. Other than that you are limiting yourself to a smaller rpm range.
TriniGT wrote:Shouldn't a GT42 push something like upwards of 700HP? For that kinda of power and better response a GT3076R or a GT35R is recommended, faster spool. Other than that you are limiting yourself to a smaller rpm range.
Sinister_Audio wrote:lol...
thaz nothing...
i hav another vid...
roti @ 13 psi doin 570....
lemme say that again slowly...
5-7-0 RWHP
@
.9 bars of boost!! (13psi)
boostbaby wrote:TriniGT wrote:Shouldn't a GT42 push something like upwards of 700HP? For that kinda of power and better response a GT3076R or a GT35R is recommended, faster spool. Other than that you are limiting yourself to a smaller rpm range.
Its a Rotary it spools those turbos like if it is a t25 turbo on it just goes to show what u kno bout rotary
Sinister_Audio wrote:12.2 on camden's NOT HOOKING TRACK?!![]()
ummm how much the chrager do![]()
![]()
how much yancy, chris, dessie, singh do?
450 on camden track and 12.2 not acceptable?
no scene hoss....
my bad he should hav done 10's
W2J wrote:Sinister_Audio wrote:12.2 on camden's NOT HOOKING TRACK?!![]()
ummm how much the chrager do![]()
![]()
how much yancy, chris, dessie, singh do?
450 on camden track and 12.2 not acceptable?
no scene hoss....
my bad he should hav done 10's
brother man I find of late you have plenty attitude for being so inexperience in the field of creating horsepower and putting it down. Let me first tell you something if most "DRIVERS" and I use this word loosely would take the time to learn their car instead of poping the clutch and flooring the accelerator through the redline they would relaise that they might do a better time. Gerald Aboud aka 996vtwin should be able to confirm what I am talking about his car made over 600+ whp over 5 years ago and could not plant the power until he started playing with traction solutions like Co2 Boost Control, Boost Ramp Rate Control, Multiple Boost Levels, Gear and Speed Based Boost with Data logging which keep the car planted to the ground.
In my personal opinion alot of these "RACERS" will go bamboo buy a engine, build it slap on some parts bring down a tuner pay him $1500usd, throw 4 gallons of C16, tune for 11.1AFR and 1120 EGT at high boost and hope for the best. In end my friend next time you address me remember to whom you speak because the main reason I sold my car was because of these same traction issues on even a better track.
W2J wrote:Sinister_Audio wrote:12.2 on camden's NOT HOOKING TRACK?!![]()
ummm how much the chrager do![]()
![]()
how much yancy, chris, dessie, singh do?
450 on camden track and 12.2 not acceptable?
no scene hoss....
my bad he should hav done 10's
brother man I find of late you have plenty attitude for being so inexperience in the field of creating horsepower and putting it down. Let me first tell you something if most "DRIVERS" and I use this word loosely would take the time to learn their car instead of poping the clutch and flooring the accelerator through the redline they would relaise that they might do a better time. Gerald Aboud aka 996vtwin should be able to confirm what I am talking about his car made over 600+ whp over 5 years ago and could not plant the power until he started playing with traction solutions like Co2 Boost Control, Boost Ramp Rate Control, Multiple Boost Levels, Gear and Speed Based Boost with Data logging which keep the car planted to the ground.
In my personal opinion alot of these "RACERS" will go bamboo buy a engine, build it slap on some parts bring down a tuner pay him $1500usd, throw 4 gallons of C16, tune for 11.1AFR and 1120 EGT at high boost and hope for the best. In end my friend next time you address me remember to whom you speak because the main reason I sold my car was because of these same traction issues on even a better track.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests