Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
sMASH wrote:I was watching the dropp off at 45hz and was saying oh geed.
But then realized thst was at over 100db's
sMASH wrote:At 90 dB ur getting 28hz... Not bad at all.
sMASH wrote:I was watching the midbass and mids comb pattern and got an idea.
was wondering if ur willing to modify the enclosure to try some experiments to see how they would affect thst comb pattern
But if ur interested in abusing this box to play around with the meter... I got some ideas.Brian Steele wrote:sMASH wrote:I was watching the dropp off at 45hz and was saying oh geed.
But then realized thst was at over 100db's
Look at the scale. This build is +/- 2.5 dB from 42 Hz to 100 Hz. The passband is probably a little bit lumpy due to proximity effects from nearby walls. Considering that Hornresp does not include the effect of box losses, it's performing as I expected.sMASH wrote:At 90 dB ur getting 28hz... Not bad at all.
I wouldn't use this design anywhere near that frequency. Fb is ~42 Hz, LOL. The driver is essentially unloaded below that point.sMASH wrote:I was watching the midbass and mids comb pattern and got an idea.
was wondering if ur willing to modify the enclosure to try some experiments to see how they would affect thst comb pattern
Are you referring to the response above 200 Hz? If I was concerned about that, I'd probably opt for a different type of design, e.g. a more tapered line to drive those resonances up in frequency to where they can be more easily dealt with by stuffing part of the line.
sMASH wrote:It seems, 6th is the way for me. T line good bit too big
Rovin wrote:something different ...
Brian Steele wrote:sMASH wrote:It seems, 6th is the way for me. T line good bit too big
Unless you're building a "bass whistle", the overall volume of a TL should be only slightly bigger than a vented box designed for the same driver. Go bigger and you just gain more output around the resonance frequency.
6th orders are winning the barevids contest because they are higher order designs that provide some gain and load the driver at more than one frequency. Vented alignments and TL alignments only load the driver at one frequency.
sMASH wrote:I will dedicate some time to design a t line, snd tryyyyyyyyy to model it in horn rsp. But that software bummies me.
sMASH wrote:On thr topic of overly complex designs...
Can u put differently tuned ports in the same enclosure?
Brian Steele wrote:sMASH wrote:On thr topic of overly complex designs...
Can u put differently tuned ports in the same enclosure?
Yes, but why would you? You'd still end up with one Fb anyway, and one vent working better than the other.
I was thinking thwt, soooo the idea is, to max out the lower tuned radiator , and make the higher tuned one, smaller to keep it balanced.Rovin wrote:yrsssssss ago i tried doing 2 different port tunings on a basic simple ported box jes to hear for myself what wud happen - u tend to hear d higher freqs more pronounced over d lower 1s, so imo it doesnt make any sense but hey i got to experiment & experience in real life rather than jes taking what random ppl posts on d interwebz ...
sMASH wrote:I was thinking thwt, soooo the idea is, to max out the lower tuned radiator , and make the higher tuned one, smaller to keep it balanced.Rovin wrote:yrsssssss ago i tried doing 2 different port tunings on a basic simple ported box jes to hear for myself what wud happen - u tend to hear d higher freqs more pronounced over d lower 1s, so imo it doesnt make any sense but hey i got to experiment & experience in real life rather than jes taking what random ppl posts on d interwebz ...
I had tried wirh winisd to get some low tunes, but there tends to get a big valley between the port tune and the roll off of the sub.
So, wss thinking, to put another port to fill in that gap.
The thing is, u dont reslly see air movements away from the port tune, sooooo, In my head it could work
I getting ideas.. Realll content to fill that youtube channel.
Bro, that's whst got me fired up, lol.Rovin wrote:go watch HEXIBASE channel, u will get even more ideas ...
Yeah, long large ports fir lows. And smsller one for the higher bass.ruffneck_12 wrote:sMASH wrote:I was thinking thwt, soooo the idea is, to max out the lower tuned radiator , and make the higher tuned one, smaller to keep it balanced.Rovin wrote:yrsssssss ago i tried doing 2 different port tunings on a basic simple ported box jes to hear for myself what wud happen - u tend to hear d higher freqs more pronounced over d lower 1s, so imo it doesnt make any sense but hey i got to experiment & experience in real life rather than jes taking what random ppl posts on d interwebz ...
I had tried wirh winisd to get some low tunes, but there tends to get a big valley between the port tune and the roll off of the sub.
So, wss thinking, to put another port to fill in that gap.
The thing is, u dont reslly see air movements away from the port tune, sooooo, In my head it could work
I getting ideas.. Realll content to fill that youtube channel.
with 6th order bandpass you mean pa?
Yeah it's an art and a science. To get a flat top, (ie wide bandwidth) you'll have to sacrifice loudness. Or you'll have to use insanely large volumes or port lengths especially if your plan is to dig low.
Is all tradeoffs and compromises.
If is a regular ported box, then nah, I doh see that working na bai
For a personal system/not park and pound, u really dont need more thsn thst. Yhe quality of the music is good fir daily pleasureRovin wrote:u know how long i waiting for times to gimme a demo, maybe bout a yr now, man like he disappear from tuner too ...
Rovin wrote:me ?, i not qualified or certified trained to hold any sort of clinic - other ppl are & they do have clinics, u shud join d iasca or meca ppl fb page for notifications when they have stuff going on
well look at that didnt know u at d time & how u were there, videsh\soundstream 626 on here was d guy with d 12 xxx not me, iirc i had a 12 idmax in those days
karti former store was located not far from me so i went there lots of times when they had meets, even across d road in price club carpark i went to some of d iasca meets there & when other promoters had normal carshows there too
most systems built for sq sound really nice if u know\appreciate what good stuff supposed to sound like but dont expect it to sound spicy or bass heavy to what most daily trinis are accustomed to ...
Return to “I.C.E. / Car Audio Tech”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest