Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Redman wrote:Chavez like blow out.
Right.
Again plants shut down....as you posted the industry is cyclical.
BP and Shell are the major suppliers...and the contracts were at end of life and WE want them to renegotiate on the LNG complex in order to recapture revenue lost to transfer pricing...billions per year.
That was done and the GORTT received payment and is changing how the LNG compensation is dealt with.
And you suggest a Chavez like position.
Ok.
Redman wrote:And again as repeatedly stated thhrough out the thread....the negotiation was done with a wider scope than just PTL.
And yes getting it right for us is more important than any specific plant in PTL.
If you have not caught on to the that fact by now...then ok.
Redman wrote:Lol
Morning Zoombindranath
How is freedom treating you?
Redman wrote:Well we can't all be the insightful bastion of all-inclusive morality that you are.
Out of an abundance of concern, can you point out specific instances of these dastardly mis truths....I will retract immediately.
The list is too longRedman wrote:Aha. Well again we can't
If it's everything just point out a few. That shouldn't take you long.
And also can you list what are the acceptable sources of info...that you've screened?
I'm waiting for an example of a mis truth so I can correct them all
DreamWeaver wrote:So I just took a read of the Sunday Business Guardian's interview with Franklin Khan and I must say, I am confused. Frankie said Atlantic Train 1 will be back up in mid April AND that an M5000 gas contract is imminent. Where all this gas magically coming from now? Didn't he recently say 2021 will be a bad year for gas?
https://guardian.co.tt/news/government- ... dcc16294a2
ST Auto wrote:M4 an m5 down indefinitelyFB_IMG_1617283178962.jpeg
zoom rader wrote:Red government killed Pt lisas.
Eric Williams must be a UNC
If I remember correctly they recently signed a deal for thr trinigen 1 facility to spear head a hydrogen plant.jhonnieblue wrote:Agree with zoom on this, this govt has been negotiating in bad faith to support the sector.
That energy minister has no foresight on where the sector needs to be or even how to support a transition to a green economy and the steps needed to be taken.
Right now we should be investing heavily in green hydrogen and the support facilities for such.
From an energy roadmap prospective there is little hope for this country in the next 5-10 yearszoom rader wrote:Red government killed Pt lisas.
Eric Williams must be a UNC
sMASH wrote:If I remember correctly they recently signed a deal for thr trinigen 1 facility to spear head a hydrogen plant.jhonnieblue wrote:Agree with zoom on this, this govt has been negotiating in bad faith to support the sector.
That energy minister has no foresight on where the sector needs to be or even how to support a transition to a green economy and the steps needed to be taken.
Right now we should be investing heavily in green hydrogen and the support facilities for such.
From an energy roadmap prospective there is little hope for this country in the next 5-10 yearszoom rader wrote:Red government killed Pt lisas.
Eric Williams must be a UNC
After the reform the gas, wonder what the process will be to take the carbon out of the loop after they extract thr hydrogen
OR they can can just run the ammonia process Inefficiently to recover excess hydrogen in the purge gas recovery
After my brief stint in Caroni I spent a good 20 years working in Pt lisas with NGC, Fertrin, Ispat, Tringen and other plants. Leant the most from these plants. They provided good paying jobs and an above agv lifestyle.jhonnieblue wrote:Agree with zoom on this, this govt has been negotiating in bad faith to support the sector.
That energy minister has no foresight on where the sector needs to be or even how to support a transition to a green economy and the steps needed to be taken.
Right now we should be investing heavily in green hydrogen and the support facilities for such.
From an energy roadmap prospective there is little hope for this country in the next 5-10 yearszoom rader wrote:Red government killed Pt lisas.
Eric Williams must be a UNC
De Dragon wrote:sMASH wrote:If I remember correctly they recently signed a deal for thr trinigen 1 facility to spear head a hydrogen plant.jhonnieblue wrote:Agree with zoom on this, this govt has been negotiating in bad faith to support the sector.
That energy minister has no foresight on where the sector needs to be or even how to support a transition to a green economy and the steps needed to be taken.
Right now we should be investing heavily in green hydrogen and the support facilities for such.
From an energy roadmap prospective there is little hope for this country in the next 5-10 yearszoom rader wrote:Red government killed Pt lisas.
Eric Williams must be a UNC
After the reform the gas, wonder what the process will be to take the carbon out of the loop after they extract thr hydrogen
OR they can can just run the ammonia process Inefficiently to recover excess hydrogen in the purge gas recovery
Hydrogen plants typically thrive when the plants they are supposed to supply have no reformers of their own from conception. A reformer is typically 1/4 of the cost of a plant, so if a greenfield plant can avoid this cost, and receive a reliable, cheaper source of hydrogen, then they go that route. No one really cares whether the hydrogen is green or not, cost is, and will always be, the overriding factor.
sMASH wrote:De Dragon wrote:sMASH wrote:If I remember correctly they recently signed a deal for thr trinigen 1 facility to spear head a hydrogen plant.jhonnieblue wrote:Agree with zoom on this, this govt has been negotiating in bad faith to support the sector.
That energy minister has no foresight on where the sector needs to be or even how to support a transition to a green economy and the steps needed to be taken.
Right now we should be investing heavily in green hydrogen and the support facilities for such.
From an energy roadmap prospective there is little hope for this country in the next 5-10 yearszoom rader wrote:Red government killed Pt lisas.
Eric Williams must be a UNC
After the reform the gas, wonder what the process will be to take the carbon out of the loop after they extract thr hydrogen
OR they can can just run the ammonia process Inefficiently to recover excess hydrogen in the purge gas recovery
Hydrogen plants typically thrive when the plants they are supposed to supply have no reformers of their own from conception. A reformer is typically 1/4 of the cost of a plant, so if a greenfield plant can avoid this cost, and receive a reliable, cheaper source of hydrogen, then they go that route. No one really cares whether the hydrogen is green or not, cost is, and will always be, the overriding factor.
but when they reform the methane and extract the h2, what going to go on with the carbon?
a reformer may be the most economical way to extract h2 due to economies of scale, but how green it will be will be determined by the path of the carbon... unless, they plan to send the carbon to the methanol plants to improve their process... and in that case, letting m4 and 5 shut down might not be the best state to let happen.
the cgcl and methanex plants burn methane to generate the extra carbon they need to further the process. they might want to look at installing a purge gas recovery system at methanol plants and just extract the excess h2 from their front ends, and balance by h2 removal, rather co2 addition. u might just suffer with ur steam production, so just increase ur aux boiler capacity.
why i fretting about this is, cause i experienced some 'test projects' with pie in the sky logics used justify them. yeah they got the financiers to put out millions of dollars to go ahead but when i read the process, it didnt make sense and kept thinking that i missing sumting. so said so done, waste of times and monies.
they going to push a project tru, that will not be viable and taint the whole concept for all the people that not familiar but still need to buy into it. like most govt projects.
i just need to know what going on with the carbon. they shouldnt burn methane to produce h2 unless they have a very good use for the carbon.
De Dragon wrote:sMASH wrote:De Dragon wrote:sMASH wrote:If I remember correctly they recently signed a deal for thr trinigen 1 facility to spear head a hydrogen plant.jhonnieblue wrote:Agree with zoom on this, this govt has been negotiating in bad faith to support the sector.
That energy minister has no foresight on where the sector needs to be or even how to support a transition to a green economy and the steps needed to be taken.
Right now we should be investing heavily in green hydrogen and the support facilities for such.
From an energy roadmap prospective there is little hope for this country in the next 5-10 yearszoom rader wrote:Red government killed Pt lisas.
Eric Williams must be a UNC
After the reform the gas, wonder what the process will be to take the carbon out of the loop after they extract thr hydrogen
OR they can can just run the ammonia process Inefficiently to recover excess hydrogen in the purge gas recovery
Hydrogen plants typically thrive when the plants they are supposed to supply have no reformers of their own from conception. A reformer is typically 1/4 of the cost of a plant, so if a greenfield plant can avoid this cost, and receive a reliable, cheaper source of hydrogen, then they go that route. No one really cares whether the hydrogen is green or not, cost is, and will always be, the overriding factor.
but when they reform the methane and extract the h2, what going to go on with the carbon?
a reformer may be the most economical way to extract h2 due to economies of scale, but how green it will be will be determined by the path of the carbon... unless, they plan to send the carbon to the methanol plants to improve their process... and in that case, letting m4 and 5 shut down might not be the best state to let happen.
the cgcl and methanex plants burn methane to generate the extra carbon they need to further the process. they might want to look at installing a purge gas recovery system at methanol plants and just extract the excess h2 from their front ends, and balance by h2 removal, rather co2 addition. u might just suffer with ur steam production, so just increase ur aux boiler capacity.
why i fretting about this is, cause i experienced some 'test projects' with pie in the sky logics used justify them. yeah they got the financiers to put out millions of dollars to go ahead but when i read the process, it didnt make sense and kept thinking that i missing sumting. so said so done, waste of times and monies.
they going to push a project tru, that will not be viable and taint the whole concept for all the people that not familiar but still need to buy into it. like most govt projects.
i just need to know what going on with the carbon. they shouldnt burn methane to produce h2 unless they have a very good use for the carbon.
If the hydrogen project is using electrolysis, then the only byproduct will be Oxygen, and some water.
AFAIK, the IPSL, now Proman methanol plants got their CO2 from PCS, now Nutrien. With the idling of the biggest plants M5 and M4, the CO2 not used by the Urea plants in Nutrien, will be vented to atmosphere thus contributing further to green house gas emissions.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], foreignused, stillwater and 86 guests