Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
VexXx Dogg wrote:Ministers are woefully underpaid for their portfolios eh.
That's a bitter pill to swallow, but it's true.
Private sector leadership making 3-5X that easily.
hover11 wrote:Aren't they among the highest paid politicians in the region though, remember these are the same ppl who if they if they feel they are underpaid can simply vote on it and like it magic it increases no questions asked...just sayingVexXx Dogg wrote:Ministers are woefully underpaid for their portfolios eh.
That's a bitter pill to swallow, but it's true.
Private sector leadership making 3-5X that easily.
ProtonPowder wrote:VexXx Dogg wrote:Ministers are woefully underpaid for their portfolios eh.
That's a bitter pill to swallow, but it's true.
Private sector leadership making 3-5X that easily.
dotish point to make. The US president gets paid 400k a year which is still less than the top dogs in the private sector in the USA.
Politicians are in it for the power, and subsequent enrichment, not the ministerial salaries.
VexXx Dogg wrote:Ministers are woefully underpaid for their portfolios eh.
That's a bitter pill to swallow, but it's true.
Private sector leadership making 3-5X that easily.
alfa wrote:VexXx Dogg wrote:Ministers are woefully underpaid for their portfolios eh.
That's a bitter pill to swallow, but it's true.
Private sector leadership making 3-5X that easily.
While this may be true I personally don't think people should go into politics as a job and the lower salary might actually be a way to prevent that. It should be an honest desire to serve the country.
Most of them are qualified to get jobs that pay far better than that of ministers anyway so it leads one to wonder if they're really doing it to serve which would be good, or to fill their pockets on the side
alfa wrote:VexXx Dogg wrote:Ministers are woefully underpaid for their portfolios eh.
That's a bitter pill to swallow, but it's true.
Private sector leadership making 3-5X that easily.
While this may be true I personally don't think people should go into politics as a job and the lower salary might actually be a way to prevent that. It should be an honest desire to serve the country.
Most of them are qualified to get jobs that pay far better than that of ministers anyway so it leads one to wonder if they're really doing it to serve which would be good, or to fill their pockets on the side
Simple answer, we accept it so in essence we allow it. I don't want anybody reply well public servants traveling officers get that too. If you are a traveling officer the vehicle you get the tax exemption with you must actually USE the vehicle to get the traveling allowance and don't think for one minute the traveling is a big setta money like ministers own , sometimes is just $3000 for the month when u have to go all over trinidad that's not much. Anyway , it is what it is , the wise will continue to live off the foolish, that's the game of politics88sins wrote:alfa wrote:VexXx Dogg wrote:Ministers are woefully underpaid for their portfolios eh.
That's a bitter pill to swallow, but it's true.
Private sector leadership making 3-5X that easily.
While this may be true I personally don't think people should go into politics as a job and the lower salary might actually be a way to prevent that. It should be an honest desire to serve the country.
Most of them are qualified to get jobs that pay far better than that of ministers anyway so it leads one to wonder if they're really doing it to serve which would be good, or to fill their pockets on the side
You realize, you just asked and answered your own question right?
Anywho, I got a question of my own for allyuh.
Why does a minister, need to buy a million dollar vehicle, to park in his residence, & pay zero taxes on said purchase, while he is being driven around 24/7 for the entirety of his term as a minister, both for work and personally, with a state owned and maintained vehicle and security detail that the taxpayers pay for?
And don't gimme that "it's a perk of the job" h0rsesh!t.
88sins wrote:alfa wrote:VexXx Dogg wrote:Ministers are woefully underpaid for their portfolios eh.
That's a bitter pill to swallow, but it's true.
Private sector leadership making 3-5X that easily.
While this may be true I personally don't think people should go into politics as a job and the lower salary might actually be a way to prevent that. It should be an honest desire to serve the country.
Most of them are qualified to get jobs that pay far better than that of ministers anyway so it leads one to wonder if they're really doing it to serve which would be good, or to fill their pockets on the side
You realize, you just asked and answered your own question right?
Anywho, I got a question of my own for allyuh.
Why does a minister, need to buy a million dollar vehicle, to park in his residence, & pay zero taxes on said purchase, while he is being driven around 24/7 for the entirety of his term as a minister, both for work and personally, with a state owned and maintained vehicle and security detail that the taxpayers pay for?
And don't gimme that "it's a perk of the job" h0rsesh!t.
death365 wrote:1. buy car with exemptions
2. wait for 3 years
3. sell to yuh family or friend cheap Or
4. sell for more than yuh pay for it
5. start back the cycle.
hope this clear it up
st7 wrote:ent public servants have this same perk or did it get removed?
No they don't, you actually have to USE the vehicle to get traveling and get the exemption .You can't just buy the vehicle and have it sit down while the government gives you another vehicle or driver to get around.st7 wrote:ent public servants have this same perk or did it get removed?
hover11 wrote:No they don't, you actually have to USE the vehicle to get traveling and get the exemption .You can't just buy the vehicle and have it sit down while the government gives you another vehicle or driver to get around.st7 wrote:ent public servants have this same perk or did it get removed?
redmanjp wrote:hover11 wrote:No they don't, you actually have to USE the vehicle to get traveling and get the exemption .You can't just buy the vehicle and have it sit down while the government gives you another vehicle or driver to get around.st7 wrote:ent public servants have this same perk or did it get removed?
perhaps they let their child drive it
Very stupid to compare normal public servants (traveling officers ) with that of politicians, do public servants buy the type of vehicles that the politicians do? Can they afford the Porsche, Benz, range rover etc to get the huge tax write off? You comparing chalk with cheese. Like I said public servants have to USE these vehicles daily to get the work done or they don't get paid , regardless if politicians use these vehicles or not they getting their allowances and salaries every monthst7 wrote:redmanjp wrote:hover11 wrote:No they don't, you actually have to USE the vehicle to get traveling and get the exemption .You can't just buy the vehicle and have it sit down while the government gives you another vehicle or driver to get around.st7 wrote:ent public servants have this same perk or did it get removed?
perhaps they let their child drive it
so according to the public servant, public servants do have the perk of enjoying tax exemptions on vehicles.
why the focus on ministers alone? it have wayyyy more of allyuh public servants that not paying tax on vehicles.
PariaMan wrote:Problem is public servants did not pass legislation to avoid taxes . Politicians did . They are the only ones that can make the required changes.
They are the ones maintaining the status quo and abusing it to the full extent.
Rowley himself admitted that it's being abused, but he seems powerless to make changes.
I really think he is just a figurehead being controlled by the puppet masters and has no real powers
He said for example that the fuel price would be floated, and Imbert just simply ignored him
Educate them and kindly remind them that the traveling allowance has not reflected the change in gas prices sometimes as an officer you still have to put extra from your own salary to get the work done. When a minister sells his vehicle he basically selling a brand new vehicle, when a traveling officer selling his he has to take what he can get due to the wear , tear and high mileageProtonPowder wrote:regular permanent public servants who are travelling officers only get some taxes paid for them on their vehicles, and it does not apply to T vehicles, only private
Then dont read or commentj.o.e wrote:Allyuh don’t get fed up of talking about this every few months ?
Carnival Costume have to buyMaxPower wrote:Soo…
The place hard, tighten allyuh belt….and allyuh VEX when ministers enjoy their perks.
But are the majority of citizens tightening their belt? Are they spending wisely?
Imported goods consumption sales decrease?
Cheaper local goods increase?
Car sales slow down?
Jamming STILL???
The vote changing for the same party they bashing?
Its the trait of the typical Trini to do his nonsense, but vex when others do the very same.
Don't forget stupid pplzoom rader wrote:Carnival Costume have to buyMaxPower wrote:Soo…
The place hard, tighten allyuh belt….and allyuh VEX when ministers enjoy their perks.
But are the majority of citizens tightening their belt? Are they spending wisely?
Imported goods consumption sales decrease?
Cheaper local goods increase?
Car sales slow down?
Jamming STILL???
The vote changing for the same party they bashing?
Its the trait of the typical Trini to do his nonsense, but vex when others do the very same.
Fete must go on
KFC have to sell
Trinidad is stupid country bro
Study how much time your minister or MP actually works to receive their big pay and perks, don't watch the small manst7 wrote:public servants also have the free time perk during working hours to spend it on dey phone scrolling tiktok, ig, fb, and post on tuner
the life nice oui
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests