No Dr. Rowley & Rfari

[UML]

Rowley abandon T&T to go to New York for a meeting with 4 PNM members!!

Rowley, PNM team in New York

Saturday, July 12 2014

OPPOSITION Leader and People’s National Movement (PNM) political leader, Dr Keith Rowley is in New York for a series of engagements. He left Trinidad on Thursday.

However Rowley disclosed that despite his busy schedule over the next few days, he will be watching the World Cup 2014 third/fourth playoff between Brazil and the Netherlands in Brasilia today.

Rowley also dismissed criticisms made by government spokespersons about his statement regarding Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar’s private visit to Brazil.

A statement issued from the Opposition Leader’s Office indicated Rowley will be accompanied on this trip by PNM deputy leaders Marlene McDonald and Rohan Sinanan; party elections officer Foster Cummings; PNM labour relations officer; San Fernando Mayor Kazim Hosein and Opposition Senator Diane Baldeo Chadeesingh.

Over this weekend, Rowley will meet with TT nationals residing in New York. He is expected to attend a number of events, including meetings in Brooklyn and Queens. Rowley is also scheduled to deliver the feature address at Medgar Evers College in Brooklyn. Rowley and his team are expected to return home next week.

In a statement on Wednesday, Communications Minister Vasant Bharath criticised Rowley and claimed Rowley never revealed the reasons for a trip he made to Dubai during the PNM’s internal election campaign. In an interview with Sunday Newsday in May, Rowley said his trip to Dubai was a “working vacation.”
http://www.newsday.co.tt/politics/0,197518.html

No Dr. Rowley...your a hypocrite to criticize the PM!!!

[UML]

[UML]

All dem paralyzed deadhorse deadbeat has been pnm come out from dey holes cause being a minority dey fraid lol

[UML]

PANIC!!!! Rowley on tv

ROFL

[ronsin1]

PANIC!!!! Rowley on tv

ROFL

What did you think about the speech

[kjaglal76v2]

so lets not get misled and misdirected by these long-haired battyboys!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

[UML]

PANIC!!!! Rowley on tv

ROFL

What did you think about the speech

I didn't really watch it.

[ronsin1]

PANIC!!!! Rowley on tv

ROFL

What did you think about the speech

I didn't really watch it.

interesting Fact seems this is why you make such blind statements how can you really support something and you have not heard the other side.
While at this Point I am neither a support of the current Government nor the PNM I listen to both sides because I need to hear what both sides

[UML]

PANIC!!!! Rowley on tv

ROFL

What did you think about the speech

I didn't really watch it.

interesting Fact seems this is why you make such blind statements how can you really support something and you have not heard the other side.
While at this Point I am neither a support of the current Government nor the PNM I listen to both sides because I need to hear what both sides

Ok i's ah sheep baaaa

So lewwe hear what u think then. I would think das why u commented.

[kaylex]

lol..UML,ZOOM et al.. still up to ole tricks..??
hope these guys are paid for this oui...

[ronsin1]

PANIC!!!! Rowley on tv

ROFL

What did you think about the speech

I didn't really watch it.

interesting Fact seems this is why you make such blind statements how can you really support something and you have not heard the other side.
While at this Point I am neither a support of the current Government nor the PNM I listen to both sides because I need to hear what both sides

Ok i's ah sheep baaaa

So lewwe hear what u think then. I would think das why u commented.

I thought it was a good speech he spoke out of his arse as usual but at least I heard what he had to say. Unfortunately I do not agree with any side at this point both side have relevant points but they are self serving.

What Rowley stated last night was the PNM stance on reform all along which is reform the tax law give executive power to local government. And MP will be independent of ministerial portfolio so they could service the needs of their people.
The government is pushing two party politics and will push for the run off just to get rod of the third party. Other parts of their proposal I agree with. This may hurt the or assist the in the next election.

So now tell me what you this

[pete]

How does the prime minister steal money for the fifteen days after the election if there needs to be a runoff? I don't really understand this argument besides it being fear mongering.

Right now if one party gets 34% of the votes and the other two get 33% the one with 34 wins but 2/3 of the people did not vote for that party. Does it really make sense that that person should represent the minority of people in the constituency? If the people who vote for the third place party then decide not to vote again and the second set of results the same party wins 52/48 then so be it but they can also vote for which of the other they want to vote for.

[ronsin1]

How does the prime minister steal money for the fifteen days after the election if there needs to be a runoff? I don't really understand this argument besides it being fear mongering.

Right now if one party gets 34% of the votes and the other two get 33% the one with 34 wins but 2/3 of the people did not vote for that party. Does it really make sense that that person should represent the minority of people in the constituency? If the people who vote for the third place party then decide not to vote again and the second set of results the same party wins 52/48 then so be it but they can also vote for which of the other they want to vote for.

As I said Rowley was talking out of him arse in certain things the 15 days crap he was talking about does not really make sense as once election is called all decision making by the government needs to be halted that was not the case with the PNM as during the run up to elections leases on buildings were signed and to date the government could not get out of them

[UML]

PANIC!!!! Rowley on tv

ROFL

What did you think about the speech

I didn't really watch it.

interesting Fact seems this is why you make such blind statements how can you really support something and you have not heard the other side.
While at this Point I am neither a support of the current Government nor the PNM I listen to both sides because I need to hear what both sides

Ok i's ah sheep baaaa

So lewwe hear what u think then. I would think das why u commented.

I thought it was a good speech he spoke out of his arse as usual but at least I heard what he had to say. Unfortunately I do not agree with any side at this point both side have relevant points but they are self serving.

What Rowley stated last night was the PNM stance on reform all along which is reform the tax law give executive power to local government. And MP will be independent of ministerial portfolio so they could service the needs of their people.
The government is pushing two party politics and will push for the run off just to get rod of the third party. Other parts of their proposal I agree with. This may hurt the or assist the in the next election.

So now tell me what you this

So what had the pnm been waiting for all these 50 years?
Coulda, woulda, shoulda, but........... NEVA!!!

It take PP to fix PNM areas like Diego Martin....PNM would never make the mistake to fix UNC areas!!! They have been neglected for 50 years.




The computer hacking, dumpster diving super hero.

[zoom rader]

lol..UML,ZOOM et al.. still up to ole tricks..??
hope these guys are paid for this oui...

Paid? what you on about bro that would be the Habit, did check the timing when he came back to tuner. Rowley gone in to panic mode and send the Habit.

[Habit7]

So since you here through the PP's last four election losses, does that mean the PP is always on the backfoot?

[zoom rader]

So since you here through the PP's last four election losses, does that mean the PP is always on the backfoot?

I here before PP bro.

--------See when I joined tuner

[UML]

I really finding it strange that I cant find articles online....looking for the one in the guardian where Roodal Moonilal says the PNM is being hypocritical because the runoff concept was introduced by THEM in THEIR internal elections!!!

PNM and ILP criticized, opposed, used scare tactics with Proportional Representation in the last elections as they are criticizing, opposing and using scare tactics with the runoff idea....PNM and ILP benefited from PR in the last elections!!!

PNM is a Minority party and ALWAYS wins with a 3 party fight for elections.

Ghany: Run-off not new to PNM
Published:
Wednesday, August 6, 2014
Gail Alexander


Constitutional expert Dr Hamid Ghany says the run-off poll proposal was something the Opposition PNM introduced in its party constitution recently and it was not an alien concept to the PNM. He was among members of the Constitution Commission who made recommendations for constitutional reform. He was responding yesterday to specific questions on the various proposals the Prime Minister announced Monday.

He said: “I think these measures require a simple majority and could have been done by any previous prime minister. I think the question is whether they had the political will or desire to do it. The term limits for prime ministers was advocated by the ONR in 1981 and that debate went on for years. “Recall of MPs is another issue debated for years and is nothing new and the run-off aspect isn’t alien, as it was introduced by the PNM and detailed at a press conference by PNM chairman Franklin Khan and Ashton Ford at Balisier House.”

He said the proposals for a run-off poll and others could be made with a simple majority, which was why they could have been done at any time Ghany noted the measures would empower the electorate, ensuring it got the MPs who received a majority of votes rather than ones who don’t and would increase interest in elections and registration. “There’s been great debate on first-past-the-post systems and proportional representation was offered as an alternative.

“It’s not being put forward here but this is a fine-tuning of the first-past-the-post system and it’s been embarked upon by major parties. The PNM introduced it for their party poll but they didn’t use it fully, since their candidates all won by 50 per cent of the votes in that internal election,” he said. Former public service head Reginald Dumas, meanwhile, said he agreed with the term limits for prime ministers, an NAR proposal, and the principle of right of recall though the latter must be worked out to prevent abuse of the system

Dumas said: “But I wonder if the run-off poll, in our system, might not have the effect of eliminating third parties and this may not be best for democracy. “In 2007 the COP got many votes but no seats. In a run-off COP people may not vote, so where’s the voice of the people of COP to be heard in this process?

“I am unsure this is in the best interest of democracy. It may certainly eliminate third parties and see coalition politics masquerading as single party politics. We are reverting to the two-party system that has bedevilled us all along. “Also, while the first two ideas were in the PP manifesto, this is a new proposal and which should be discussed with the public.”
http://www.guardian.co.tt/news/2014-08- ... ot-new-pnm

the COP is a minority party hiding behind a majority party and is fearful as well...AGAIN they go to the media FIRST and not discuss with the PM. Carol Seepersad Bachan is intent on destroying the partnership AGAIN.


So the PNM being hypocritical by saying the runoff GOOD for them and not good for the country!!

[UML]

me
Moonilal on reform legislation: PNM missed boat to raise questions
Published:
Wednesday, August 6, 2014


The Opposition People’s National Movement (PNM) missed two opportunities at Monday’s parliamentary session launch to query the holding of Parliament sessions this month and also to ask questions about the constitutional reform legislation to be debated next week, says People’s Partnership (PP) House Leader Roodal Moonilal.

“(PNM leader) Dr (Keith) Rowley was apparently asleep when those two opportunities—both prescribed in the Standing Orders—arose in Monday’s parliamentary session so the Opposition therefore missed the boat on both issues,” Moonilal said. He was commenting after PNM PRO Faris Al-Rawi said the Government had breached the Parliament’s new Standing Orders to hold sessions now to debate the legislation. One session will be held next Monday.

Al-Rawi said the Standing Orders provided for a fixed recess unless Parliament has exceptional, urgent business and the Speaker should have given certification of the exceptional business to be considered but failed to do so. On what the PNM might do and whether it might legally challenge the move, Al-Rawi said yesterday it would examine all options, since there was no way the Parliament could debate something in breach of the Standing Orders. He said the PNM had given notice by raising it in the public domain.

PNM whip Marlene McDonald also said she did not know as yet if the PNM would challenge the situation but might know after its meetings today. Parliament officials said no Opposition MP objected in Monday’s session when the adjournment to next Monday was announced. Moonilal added: “If Mr Al-Rawi believes the session is illegal and contrary to the Standing Orders then I wouldn’t encourage them to attend the session.

“But Dr Rowley has clearly not read the Standing Orders because if he did he would understand the Standing Orders provides for certain privileges. “But no Standing Orders can provide for permanent closing down of the Parliament. “While Section 11, 13 and 14 provide for two months’ vacation, it also provides for Parliament to determine if a sitting will be held during that period and if it’s urgent, the Government can, via vote, hold any amount of sessions.

“So Dr Rowley on Monday should have debated the motion for the adjournment to Monday.” Speaker Wade Mark on Monday announced the introduction of the new Standing Orders and particularly reminded MPs of a handful of stipulations, including Standing Order 24, which also allows for one member from each party in opposition to ask a brief question for elucidation on statements by ministers.
http://www.guardian.co.tt/news/2014-08- ... -questions

[De Dragon]

So the issue is urgent enough for all sort of doom and gloom predictions by the Opposition/ILP, but not urgent enough to attend a debate session? That is why I will never view politicians of all parties as anything other than self serving and out of touch with the people.

[UML]

No Rolls Royce
No New York Consulate scandal
No OPV payments
No Emailgate scandal (pending)
No Propaganda!

AG condemns compensation story
...Accuses the PNM of making mischief

Story Created: Aug 16, 2014 at 9:29 PM ECT

Story Updated: Aug 16, 2014 at 9:29 PM ECT

Attorney General Anand Ramlogan said yesterday he wanted to “categorically condemn and refute” an article entitled “Clyde shipyard bosses win £130m compensation battle” which he said had “gone viral on social media on certain sites associated with and supportive of the Opposition”.

“This is political mischief of the highest order. It seeks to revive an old article that was published in the Evening Times newspaper on 15 November 2012, at a time when Opposition Leader Keith Rowley was publicly announcing that the Government had lost the OPV arbitration and was ordered to pay British Aerospace Engineering (BAE) hundreds of millions of dollars.

“The article in the Evening Times newspaper confirmed the erroneous statements that were being made by Dr Rowley here in Trinidad.”

The Evening Times is published in Scotland and reports on shipbuilders like BAE which operate on the banks of the Clyde River.

Ramlogan said: “This erroneous article was quickly withdrawn after I threatened to sue the newspaper on behalf of the Government. A retraction was in fact published the following day by the Evening Times newspaper on the 16 November 2012. The correction can be seen by clicking on the following link:


http://www.eveningtimes.co.uk/news/bae- ... n.19429991

“Much to the surprise, disappointment and chagrin of the Opposition, the Government emerged victorious in the OPV arbitration with BAE agreeing to pay the sum of 1.4 billion TT dollars to the State. This settlement was arrived at after I testified and was cross-examined over a two-day period in the arbitration in London.”

He added: “It should be noted that the settlement came after both sides had presented their evidence and arguments and judgment reserved by the arbitrators. This is an important clarification as it being touted that the matter was settled without any hearing before the arbitration tribunal.”

Ramlogan said: “This misleading article has suddenly resurfaced on various PNM social media sites and is being forwarded to media personnel as part of a wider campaign design to discredit me.

“It is a blatant lie and should be consigned to the legal scrapyard alongside the numerous other falsehoods that have been perpetuated against me.

“These include racists statement made at the New York Mission (which I never visited), that I abused my position to seek personal banking information of private citizens from the FIU, that I have given 51 per cent of State briefs to my former law firm and the outrageous emailgate and prisongate scandals.”

http://www.trinidadexpress.com/news/AG- ... 46411.html

BAE ships contract

The Evening Times yesterday reported that shipbuilder BAE Systems had won a £130million compensation battle with the Trinidad and Tobago Government after the Caribbean Republic had cancelled an order for three offshore patrol vessels.

We published the article after a spokeswoman for the defence contractor claimed it was to receive the cash payment.

However, BAE has in fact agreed to compensate the republic, which had cancelled the £150m order, after it claimed the delivery dates for all three ships were delayed and the combat system on two of them had failed during sea trials.

BAE Systems today declined to comment further on the result of the negotiations other than to confirm a "settlement" had been reached with the Trinidad and Tobago Government.

We are happy to clarify this here.
http://www.eveningtimes.co.uk/news/bae- ... n.19429991

[de_dougla_smurf]

wat a fgt

/ched

[UML]

No Rolls Royce
No New York Consulate scandal
No OPV payments
No Emailgate scandal
No $150,000,000 House owned by Kamla (that you party mentioned)
No Propaganda!

AG condemns compensation story
...Accuses the PNM of making mischief

Story Created: Aug 16, 2014 at 9:29 PM ECT

Story Updated: Aug 16, 2014 at 9:29 PM ECT

Attorney General Anand Ramlogan said yesterday he wanted to “categorically condemn and refute” an article entitled “Clyde shipyard bosses win £130m compensation battle” which he said had “gone viral on social media on certain sites associated with and supportive of the Opposition”.

“This is political mischief of the highest order. It seeks to revive an old article that was published in the Evening Times newspaper on 15 November 2012, at a time when Opposition Leader Keith Rowley was publicly announcing that the Government had lost the OPV arbitration and was ordered to pay British Aerospace Engineering (BAE) hundreds of millions of dollars.

“The article in the Evening Times newspaper confirmed the erroneous statements that were being made by Dr Rowley here in Trinidad.”

The Evening Times is published in Scotland and reports on shipbuilders like BAE which operate on the banks of the Clyde River.

Ramlogan said: “This erroneous article was quickly withdrawn after I threatened to sue the newspaper on behalf of the Government. A retraction was in fact published the following day by the Evening Times newspaper on the 16 November 2012. The correction can be seen by clicking on the following link:


http://www.eveningtimes.co.uk/news/bae- ... n.19429991

“Much to the surprise, disappointment and chagrin of the Opposition, the Government emerged victorious in the OPV arbitration with BAE agreeing to pay the sum of 1.4 billion TT dollars to the State. This settlement was arrived at after I testified and was cross-examined over a two-day period in the arbitration in London.”

He added: “It should be noted that the settlement came after both sides had presented their evidence and arguments and judgment reserved by the arbitrators. This is an important clarification as it being touted that the matter was settled without any hearing before the arbitration tribunal.”

Ramlogan said: “This misleading article has suddenly resurfaced on various PNM social media sites and is being forwarded to media personnel as part of a wider campaign design to discredit me.

“It is a blatant lie and should be consigned to the legal scrapyard alongside the numerous other falsehoods that have been perpetuated against me.

“These include racists statement made at the New York Mission (which I never visited), that I abused my position to seek personal banking information of private citizens from the FIU, that I have given 51 per cent of State briefs to my former law firm and the outrageous emailgate and prisongate scandals.”

http://www.trinidadexpress.com/news/AG- ... 46411.html

BAE ships contract

The Evening Times yesterday reported that shipbuilder BAE Systems had won a £130million compensation battle with the Trinidad and Tobago Government after the Caribbean Republic had cancelled an order for three offshore patrol vessels.

We published the article after a spokeswoman for the defence contractor claimed it was to receive the cash payment.

However, BAE has in fact agreed to compensate the republic, which had cancelled the £150m order, after it claimed the delivery dates for all three ships were delayed and the combat system on two of them had failed during sea trials.

BAE Systems today declined to comment further on the result of the negotiations other than to confirm a "settlement" had been reached with the Trinidad and Tobago Government.

We are happy to clarify this here.
http://www.eveningtimes.co.uk/news/bae- ... n.19429991

FIXED






RESIGN NOW!!!

[Paratrooper]

Buh Rowley deserves to win, who else has served in Government at such levels longer than him?

Jealous and racist stooges are probably afraid of losing their handouts 2015

[shogun]

Himself unto himself.

Schizo ched oui. LoL

[Crescendo Dîáz]

Rowley doesnt have time to respond to such loser mentality

[kjaglal76v2]

^^^:roll:
election in the air, PNM tribe leader has sent out his minions to pollute all aspects of society

[UML]

No Rolls Royce
No New York Consulate scandal
No OPV payments
No Emailgate scandal
No $150,000,000 House owned by Kamla (that you party mentioned)
No Propaganda!

NO NO NO!!!

[UML]

Lawyer: Unearth co-conspirators to evil plot

Tweet

As California court blocks IC action against Google...
Renuka Singh
Published:
Monday, August 25, 2014
Attorney General Anand Ramlogan hugs his attorney Pamela Elder SC following a press conference where he sought to clear his name in the E-mailgate scandal yesterday. PHOTO: MICHEAL BRUCE

The e-mails that triggered the 15 month long E-mailgate scandal are fake. Attorney General Anand Ramlogan yesterday produced confirmation from Google Inc invalidating the e-mails read out in Parliament by Opposition leader Dr Keith Rowley in May last year. Ramlogan was accompanied by his lawyer, Senior Counsel Pamela Elder and his US-based counsel, partner at Computerlaw Group LLP Chris Sargent, on Skype, who explained the legal procedure that led to that determination.

Sargent also said that a “notice of pendency of other action or proceeding” was filed in the same California court yesterday to block the current Integrity Commission legal action against Google as it would be a duplication of the efforts and would provide the same information that is already in hand. The three spoke with the media at the AG’s office on St Vincent Street, Port-of-Spain.

Sargent said the notice was electronically filed yesterday and informs the court that the information being sought by the commission from Google has already been provided. Ramlogan said this was just one of the many fouled Rowley-driven conspiracies against him.
“It is my intention to sue Dr Rowley for malicious defamation of character,” Ramlogan said, adding that he would also advise Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar and the other ministers mentioned in the e-mails to do the same.

He said though Rowley first mentioned the matter in Parliament, where he is protected by parliamentary privilege, he repeated the e-mails on platforms in the public domain.
“I do not buy for one moment that he got them in his letterbox,” Ramlogan said. “It has been a long journey with a cloud of suspicion unnecessarily lurking and hanging over my head. But I am very happy that this revelation and vindication has come.”

Ramlogan described the past 15 months as a “trying time,” saying it was the first time he was ever accused of any criminal wrongdoing. Elder described the e-mails as “forged” and “diabolical.”
“The essence of those documents, the meat of it, is that those documents which were passed off, which were laid in the House by the Honourable Leader of the Opposition, they are not authentic,” she said.

“Not only are they not authentic, they did not emanate from the e-mail account of the Honourable Prime Minister of T&T and the Honourable Attorney General,” Elder said. She said they had been saying from inception that the first course of action should be to access the servers and not the private computers of the Prime Minister, the Attorney General or the other ministers.

“I would be immediately writing to the acting Commissioner of Police, the Integrity Commission and the Director of Public Prosecutions to do all that is necessary to unearth the co-conspirators to this evil plot,” she said.
Elder said she would send a copy of the Google documents to Rowley. “That is the proper thing to do, let him read for himself, and we await his response,” she said.

Sargent said the notice to block the Integrity Commission was sent to its US-based lawyers and the judge responsible for the case. That notice to the California court, which Ramlogan provided, says Ramlogan’s query to Google was more detailed and requested more information on the e-mails than that of the Integrity Commission.
“The Integrity Commission, which seeks similar discovery related to its investigation of Mr Ramlogan and Mrs Persad-Bissessar, has only now embarked upon this process,” that document states.

Google confirms: E-mails not located
Google’s response, signed by its Custodian of Records, Chi Nguyen, stated that the e-mail address anand@tstt.net.tt was an active account but that Google was “unable to locate records showing e-mails received from or sent to the accounts.”
“Google certifies that it has located no e-mails sent to or from the Google apps account anand@tstt.net.tt to or from the gmail account kamlapb1@gmail.com on September 2012,” the document noted.

That document also shows that Ramlogan leveraged on Google on August 26, 2013 “seeking information related to a series of alleged e-mail accounts and e-mails allegedly sent from and to those accounts.”
When Ramlogan was asked why he chose not to divulge that information then, Elder said it was she who instructed him to remain quiet on the issue up until now.

Google, according to the document, searched all the e-mails relating to the Prime Minister and Ramlogan mentioned that Rowley read out in May 2013 as part of his motion of no confidence against the Prime Minister. The search included anan@gmail.com, anand@tstt.net.tt, anan@gmail.com@gmail.com, kamlapb1@gmail.comgmail.com, and kamlapb1@gmail.com.
In a text exchange with the T&TGuardian yesterday, Dr Keith Rowley said he has “no interest in the private affairs of Mr Ramlogan.”

“To the best of my knowledge when the information was introduced in the Parliament there was a request for an investigation. It has since been revealed that there was a police investigation for over a year and more recently an investigation by the Integrity Commission. These are the State’s efforts. I will be guided by that,” Rowley said.

Commission chairman: No comment
In a brief interview with the T&T Guardian yesterday, Integrity Commission chairman Ken Gordon said he would not be able to comment until he saw the documents.
“This is the first I am hearing of it. I have to see the documents before I make a comment,” Gordon said. When asked whether the T&T Guardian could have them delivered to him, he declined. “I am sorry, I am unavailable today,” he said.

flashback
On May 19, 2013 Dr Rowley filed a motion of no confidence against the Prime Minister, reading a series of damning e-mails that he claimed had been dropped in his mailbox. The e-mails implicated the Prime Minister, the Attorney General and Local Government Minister in several conspiracies and cover-ups against the DPP, a plot to harm a journalist and payments to an unnamed person.

The alleged e-mail thread included the Prime Minister, the Attorney General, current Minister of National Security Gary Griffith, Local Government Minister Dr Surujrattan Rambachan and Housing Minister Dr Roodal Moonilal

Persad-Bissessar and Ramlogan admitted to owning each of the e-mail addresses but denied ever being involved in any conspiracy. They also denied any knowledge of the e-mails. Persad-Bissessar referred the matter immediately to the acting Commissioner of Police, who then assigned deputy commissioner of police Mervyn Richardson to the case.

In the months that followed the case dominated the media, eventually fading until the Integrity Commission by-passed the local Central Authority and secured a US-based attorney to sue Google for the information earlier this month.
http://www.guardian.co.tt/news/2014-08- ... -evil-plot

FYI a sworn affidavits was provided from Google.



......waiting to hear from Reginald Dumas, Ken Gordon, Dr. Winford James, TT Chamber of Commerce, Ancil Roget, David Abdullah, Jack Warner, etc.



RESIGN NOW!!!!

[eliteauto]

Sargent also said that a “notice of pendency of other action or proceeding” was filed in the same California court yesterday to block the current Integrity Commission legal action against Google as it would be a duplication of the efforts and would provide the same information that is already in hand. The three spoke with the media at the AG’s office on St Vincent Street, Port-of-Spain.

Sargent said the notice was electronically filed yesterday and informs the court that the information being sought by the commission from Google has already been provided. Ramlogan said this was just one of the many fouled Rowley-driven conspiracies against him.
“It is my intention to sue Dr Rowley for malicious defamation of character,” Ramlogan said, adding that he would also advise Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar and the other ministers mentioned in the e-mails to do the same.

very interesting that he is advising the other ministers to sue, when his private matter did not cover the other ministers and the IC matter which does cover them, he is now seeking to block from further action when in fact there is no duplication of effort there as the IC's action has a broader scope.