Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
http://961theeagle.com/what-is-the-safest-way-to-travel-by-plane-car-train-space-shuttle/ wrote:Motorcycles - 125 deaths per billion miles
Walking - 41 deaths per billion miles
Bicycles - 35 deaths per billion miles
Ferries - 20 deaths per billion miles
The Space Shuttle - 7 deaths per billion miles
Cars - 4 deaths per billion miles
Airplanes - 0.5 deaths per billion miles
Buses - 0.5 deaths per billion miles
Trains - 0.2 deaths per billion miles
http://journalistsresource.org/studies/environment/transportation/comparing-fatality-risks-united-states-transportation-across-modes-time wrote:Same stats but in the US only
Motorcycles - 212 deaths per billion miles
Cars, Trucks, SUVs - 7.3 deaths per billion miles
Airplanes - 0.07 deaths per billion miles (Excluding suicide and terrorism)
Buses - 0.11 deaths per billion miles
Trains - 0.15 deaths per billion miles (0.25 if you counts fatalities of pedestrians and collisions with cars, many of which are believed to be suicides)
rspann wrote:Rasc,You are either an as shole or you just dunce. Where did I say that I love cars more than proper development. We have roads already and they need to be developed but we have to wait years while the train comes on stream.What do we do in the meantime.You do not discuss or bring any points you only try to sheit up people. Hear what to do ,you alone post and you alone answer ,because you don't want anybody to say anything as long as it conflicts with your simpleminded single track sheit of a brain.
Slartibartfast wrote:Those motorcycle stats tho
Fuzzle wrote: Train crashes
Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:Slartibartfast wrote:Those motorcycle stats tho
Yeah well you wanna lane split locally :p
Lol, yeah. I slowed down significantly since my last accident. Realised I already saving an hour in traffic, no need to risk my life to save 5-10 minutes more.
DurzoBlint1 wrote:Wait nah tuners, ent d country in for hard times? So howz about the government take dat same money and give it to citizens to help weather the hard times rather than waste a set of money and sink the country deeper into hard times. Wat allyuh say to that?
I would like to answer your questions but I have no idea the questions refer to. Are you saying more people should buy motorcycles? Cuz if that's your point then I'll definitely agree given my personal bias.Redman wrote:Lol, yeah. I slowed down significantly since my last accident. Realised I already saving an hour in traffic, no need to risk my life to save 5-10 minutes more.
Egggzakleeeee
So what is it we trying to achieve here?
Whats an acceptable transit time?
What are we willing to pay to reduce that time ...for the portion of the population that commutes in the affected areas.?
What is the population affected?
I continue to realise that most ppl who question this project are largely uninformed about the project.DurzoBlint1 wrote:Wait nah tuners, ent d country in for hard times? So howz about the government take dat same money and give it to citizens to help weather the hard times rather than waste a set of money and sink the country deeper into hard times. Wat allyuh say to that?
EmilioA wrote:Fuzzle wrote: Train crashes
Clearly this means cars are a bad idea .
Habit7 wrote: http://www.dominicantoday.com/dr/econom ... -the-world
Santo Domingo spent only TT$150,000,000 on theirs before it broke even and made a profit.
Fuzzle wrote:EmilioA wrote:Fuzzle wrote: Train crashes
Clearly this means cars are a bad idea .
NOPE Drivers are
Slartibartfast wrote:I would like to answer your questions but I have no idea the questions refer to. Are you saying more people should buy motorcycles? Cuz if that's your point then I'll definitely agree given my personal bias.Redman wrote:Lol, yeah. I slowed down significantly since my last accident. Realised I already saving an hour in traffic, no need to risk my life to save 5-10 minutes more.
Egggzakleeeee
So what is it we trying to achieve here?
Whats an acceptable transit time?
What are we willing to pay to reduce that time ...for the portion of the population that commutes in the affected areas.?
What is the population affected?
Fuzzle wrote:
drchaos wrote:Another reason we need a RR system, diesel fumes are highly toxic. This stuff does a real number to your health, everything from worsening asthma to miscarriages. Every other vehicle on the road is running high sulphur diesel on a euro 2 emission engine or sometimes worse.
The downstream effect of a healthier population is huge!
Ok word word. I agree with this. Not just for that rapid rail but for any major project a proper cost/benefit analysis must be done.Redman wrote:you referenced not wanting risk your life for the the 5-10 minutes etc
Which demonstrates the type of analysis we need.
ie whats the risks and cost to you to save 5-10min.
Is it worth it?
Extrapolating to the RR
What we want to achieve?
What will we achieve?
whats the cost, alternatives etc?
So if it is the goal is to cut commute times to POS.....for x% of the population then is the RR and the 20B the way to go???
Is the result worth the 20B that could be used elsewhere?
All of these questions should be answered BE..FAKIN..FORE we break ground.
in a properly done and fully published study.
EmilioA wrote:rspann wrote:Everybody on this forum are tuners ,lovers of cars . Like I said the ones who talking want ban or limitation on cars but would not want their privilege taken away. Why can't a proper road network solve the traffic problem?
What is your proposed proper road network ? Our problem is that 1/2 the country trying to drive to POS in the morning and getting trapped on the CRH/ EMR