Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
EmilioA wrote:Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:Point noted.pugboy wrote:So who laughing now?
ArcelorMittal confirms closure; says employees will get all payments they're entitled to
”
At least those laid off workers will get thier money. The others ? Who knows.
Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:EmilioA wrote:Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:Point noted.pugboy wrote:So who laughing now?
ArcelorMittal confirms closure; says employees will get all payments they're entitled to
”
At least those laid off workers will get thier money. The others ? Who knows.
On the news it was said that whether you worked for 6 months or 30 years Mittal giving one month salary severance pay.
EmilioA wrote:konartis wrote:^^ no they don't...there are guidelines based on proper practice, but a private company can do as they please and if a person is affected, they can seek redress in the court based on mortality. There are no laws that govern them, this is why the government sector is well protected...laws are clearly set out in relation to employees etc...
The private business lied to you.
We are a common law jurisdiction. That means case law is as binding a legislation. The case of Annamunthodo vs OWTU decided by the Privy Council laid out that even private entities have to abide by things like fairness, legitimate expectations and due process.
These are not vague "morality" . These are long defined legal terms which mean you have to operate in a certain way and not how ever you feel like just becuase you are private.
Dizzy28 wrote:Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:EmilioA wrote:Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:Point noted.pugboy wrote:So who laughing now?
ArcelorMittal confirms closure; says employees will get all payments they're entitled to
”
At least those laid off workers will get thier money. The others ? Who knows.
On the news it was said that whether you worked for 6 months or 30 years Mittal giving one month salary severance pay.
They cant. There is a minimum standard to follow by law.
mista25 wrote:AM initiated a strategic move and were already of losses of more than 200m USD last year. These union leaders most of the time most of the time try to secure wins because they benefit from it greatly.
It was a matter of time before AM wound up in Trinidad because they declared 19billion dollar losses worldwide. Sad to see all those workers go home. We should create an unemployment post in this forum to now measure how many people are on the breadline as it now exceeds 8000.
sMASH wrote:So imagine all those people used to buy doubles and make market and do projects so purchased from hardware and ting. All that spending will come down drastically. All the spin off economies will suffer as well.
It would be in the best Interest of the country to get these people re employed . Not necessarily at the same salaries, but enough to their households and provide business for the spinoff sectors.
BRZ wrote:So as predicted here comes senior Roget with his usual singing song bullsh1t, can't believe they would suggest Nationalizing the company and the entire Industry .Trade unions really need to hush dey Kants, if anyone is to blame is the faking lazy, non productive labor, they are the absolute worse in this country, they always quick to cry injustice but they take so many extra days, reach to work late, always sick .... Bleh blew bleh"......
York wrote:sMASH wrote:So imagine all those people used to buy doubles and make market and do projects so purchased from hardware and ting. All that spending will come down drastically. All the spin off economies will suffer as well.
It would be in the best Interest of the country to get these people re employed . Not necessarily at the same salaries, but enough to their households and provide business for the spinoff sectors.
Yet prices not really going down, labour cost should to encourage the wheels spinning. Building a house may cost $10,000 less than the $800,000 to $1000,000 last year.
Companies talking about growth in a recession too. Oh and they good at cooking their books to show low net profit or losses so as to not pay corporation tax.
konartis wrote:EmilioA wrote:konartis wrote:^^ no they don't...there are guidelines based on proper practice, but a private company can do as they please and if a person is affected, they can seek redress in the court based on mortality. There are no laws that govern them, this is why the government sector is well protected...laws are clearly set out in relation to employees etc...
The private business lied to you.
We are a common law jurisdiction. That means case law is as binding a legislation. The case of Annamunthodo vs OWTU decided by the Privy Council laid out that even private entities have to abide by things like fairness, legitimate expectations and due process.
These are not vague "morality" . These are long defined legal terms which mean you have to operate in a certain way and not how ever you feel like just becuase you are private.
and u still ent prove me otherwise...which part of seek redress in the court you don't understand?? they have to abide by fairness, legitimate expectations and due process...all could be proven quite easily and this is a totally different case all together...what is prejudicial about a company folding due to financial down turn??
BRZ wrote:Union wanna play up in their arse, well the company did the right thing, Bankrupcy and da firetruck with everyone.
BRZ wrote:So as predicted here comes senior Roget with his usual singing song bullsh1t, can't believe they would suggest Nationalizing the company and the entire Industry .Trade unions really need to hush dey Kants, if anyone is to blame is the faking lazy, non productive labor, they are the absolute worse in this country, they always quick to cry injustice but they take so many extra days, reach to work late, always sick .... Bleh blew bleh"......
Redman wrote:If Mittal is such a money Satan...then we should be sure that the business is not a good place to be.
The reality is that we not competitive at these prices.
We enjoyed the commodity super cycle....we on the other side of that now.
Would we be in a different situation with the Al smelter?
EmilioA wrote:Redman wrote:If Mittal is such a money Satan...then we should be sure that the business is not a good place to be.
The reality is that we not competitive at these prices.
We enjoyed the commodity super cycle....we on the other side of that now.
Would we be in a different situation with the Al smelter?
Probably not. Aluminium was US$1.10 per pound in 2011. Its 71 cents now.
The problem is all the money that should have been saved from the high energy prices, Kamla gone and spend. We should be garnishing she wages and putting a lien on she property until she pay back the 32 billion dollar overdraft.
pugboy wrote:Manning took over Air Jamaica last time and put CAL to run it.
so maybe Rowley can take over Arcelor Mittal and localize it
hand it straight to the union to run for themselves
a true win win situation for everybody
would the union be capable and willing of handling this ?
tr1ad wrote:pugboy wrote:Manning took over Air Jamaica last time and put CAL to run it.
so maybe Rowley can take over Arcelor Mittal and localize it
hand it straight to the union to run for themselves
a true win win situation for everybody
would the union be capable and willing of handling this ?
ansa coming to save the day